On the judicial trust in the age of artificial intelligence and the way to realize it

ZHAO YANG; WANG FENGYE

doi:10.31839/ibt.2020.10.31.55

with the rapid development of artificial intelligence, a series of profound changes have taken place in the traditional judicial field, such as judges’ judgment and decision-making modes, litigation process and trial modes, judicial personnel's setting and composition structure. In the era of artificial intelligence, judicial decision may become the result of the common decision of human beings and computer systems, and the basis of the application of judgment is the general experience of judges. The traditional litigation process and regional trial modes are turning to a new Internet trial era marked by electronization and digitalization. In the era of artificial intelligence, the changes in the judicial field are fundamentally conducive to improving the judicial efficiency, and the public's trust in judicial judgment has also increased, but the essence of judicial trust has not changed fundamentally, which is still the trust to human beings and judges, not the trust to technology and machines. The first reason is that technology can not achieve the perception of justice; secondly, technology can not reflect the social value orientation; finally, technology can not predict future changes. In addition, the technology itself has potential risks and inherent defects. Therefore, it is different from the path of realizing judicial trust relying solely on system construction, the realization of judicial trust in the era of artificial intelligence should follow the path of complementary construction of technology and system. Technology and system should be promoted in integrating. The core feature of the path of technology and system matching is establishing a new Internet trial mechanism that conforms to the laws of Internet technology development and judicial laws. By establishing the access rules and application rules of artificial intelligence in the trial field, and promoting the construction of intelligent justice actively, we can realize the modernization of the judicial system and judicial capacity, and then enhance the public's trust in judges and their judicial capacity. The key problem should be solved is how to avoid and prevent the various risks attached to the application of technology in justice through the top-level design of the system. In a word, the development of technology has changed the face of human justice, but the trust of human nature has not changed. Human beings believe that artificial intelligence will be domesticated as an effective tool to improve social equity and justice if they make good use of their own wisdom and rationality.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)
REFERENCES (26)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[journal] 段厚省 / 2019 / 远程审判的双重张力 / 东方法学 (4)

[journal] 王福华 / 2016 / 电子诉讼制度构建的法律基础 / 法学研究 (6)

[journal] 蔡立东 / 2017 / 智慧法院建设 : 实施原则与制度支撑 / 中国应用法学 (2)

[journal] 何帆 / 2017 / 还有多远 / 方圆 (2)

[journal] 郑戈 / 2017 / 人工智能与法律的未来 / 探索与争鸣 (10)

[journal] 季卫东 / 2018 / 人工智能时代的司法权之变 / 东方法学 (1)

[journal] 杜宴林 / 2019 / 论人工智能时代的算法司法与算法司法正义 / 湖湘论坛 (5)

[book] Robinette, Paul / 2017 / Autonomy and Artificial Intelligence: A Threat or Savior / Springer

[journal] 张保生 / 2018 / 人工智能法律系统：两个难题和一个悖论 / 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (6)

[journal] 李峰 / 2014 / 司法如何回应网络技术的进步——兼论视听传输技术作证的运用规则 / 现代法学 (3)

[journal] 程凡卿 / 2018 / 我国司法人工智能建设的问题与应对 / 东方法学 (3)

[journal] 江秋伟 / 2019 / 论司法裁判人工智能化的空间及限度 / 学术交流 (2)

[journal] 冯洁 / 2018 / 人工智能对司法裁判理论的挑战：回应及其限度 / 华东政法大学学报 (2)

[journal] 张劲松 / 2017 / 人是机器的尺度——论人工智能与人类主体性 / 自然辩证法研究 (1)

[journal] 高嘉鲁 / 2019 / 人工智能时代我国司法智慧化的机遇、挑战及发展路径 / 山东大学学报 (3)

[other] 刘振宇 / 2017 / 人工智能时代的司法建设 / 中国社会科学报

[journal] 于海防 / 2019 / 人工智能法律规制的价值取向与逻辑前提——在替代人类与增强人类之间 / 法学 (6)

[journal] 齐昆鹏 / 2017 / 2017'人工智能：技术、伦理与法律研讨会在北京召开 / 科学与社会 (2)

[journal] 马长山 / 2018 / 人工智能的社会风险及其法律规制 / 法律科学 (6)

[journal] 周尚君 / 2019 / 人工智能司法决策的可能与限度 / 华东政法大学学报 (1)

[other] 李婕 / 2018 / 人工智能中的算法与法治公正 / 人民法院报

[other] 王婧 / 2018 / 反思人工智能的司法应用 / 中国社会科学报

[journal] 马长山 / 2020 / 司法人工智能的重塑效应及其限度 / 法学研究 / (4)

[journal] 钱大军 / 2018 / 司法人工智能的中国进程：功能替代与结构强化 / 法学评论 (5)

[journal] 潘庸鲁 / 2018 / 人工智能介入司法领域路径分析 / 东方法学 (3)

[journal] 涂永前 / 2018 / 司法审判中人工智能的介入式演进 / 西南政法大学学报 (3)

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status