Economical language use in Ancient Chinese is caused by the omission and connotation of words. The omission and connotation of words can occur in four fields: syntactic field, lexical field, pragmatic field, rhetorical field. First, the omission of the syntactic field mainly occurs in the relational verbs and existence verbs, auxiliary verb, preposition, conjunctions, dependent noun ‘所’, ‘者’ and so on. What these words have in common is that they have a little lexical meaning. The connotation of lexical field mainly occurs in noun at the predicate position. These nouns themselves includes time-meaning, sequence-meaning, process meaning. The omission of the pragmatic field, same as modern Chinese, occurs in subject, predicate, object position. The omission of the rhetorical field mainly occurs in an antithesis-expression in one clause or two clause.
@article{ART002200674}, author={LEE SO DONG}, title={A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》}, journal={The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies }, issn={1598-8503}, year={2017}, number={35}, pages={303-325}, doi={10.18212/cccs.2017..35.012}
TY - JOUR AU - LEE SO DONG TI - A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》 JO - The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies PY - 2017 VL - null IS - 35 PB - The Society For Chinese Cultural Studies SP - 303 EP - 325 SN - 1598-8503 AB - Economical language use in Ancient Chinese is caused by the omission and connotation of words. The omission and connotation of words can occur in four fields: syntactic field, lexical field, pragmatic field, rhetorical field. First, the omission of the syntactic field mainly occurs in the relational verbs and existence verbs, auxiliary verb, preposition, conjunctions, dependent noun ‘所’, ‘者’ and so on. What these words have in common is that they have a little lexical meaning. The connotation of lexical field mainly occurs in noun at the predicate position. These nouns themselves includes time-meaning, sequence-meaning, process meaning. The omission of the pragmatic field, same as modern Chinese, occurs in subject, predicate, object position. The omission of the rhetorical field mainly occurs in an antithesis-expression in one clause or two clause. KW - Ancient Chinese;omission;connotation;syntactic field;lexical field;pragmatic field;rhetorical field. DO - 10.18212/cccs.2017..35.012 ER -
LEE SO DONG. (2017). A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》. The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies , 35, 303-325.
LEE SO DONG. 2017, "A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》", The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies , no.35, pp.303-325. Available from: doi:10.18212/cccs.2017..35.012
LEE SO DONG "A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》" The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies 35 pp.303-325 (2017) : 303.
LEE SO DONG. A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》. 2017; 35 : 303-325. Available from: doi:10.18212/cccs.2017..35.012
LEE SO DONG. "A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》" The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies no.35(2017) : 303-325.doi: 10.18212/cccs.2017..35.012
LEE SO DONG. A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》. The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies , 35, 303-325. doi: 10.18212/cccs.2017..35.012
LEE SO DONG. A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》. The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies . 2017; 35 303-325. doi: 10.18212/cccs.2017..35.012
LEE SO DONG. A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》. 2017; 35 : 303-325. Available from: doi:10.18212/cccs.2017..35.012
LEE SO DONG. "A Study on the Substantiality of Economical Language Use in Ancient Chinese ― Centering around 《MNEGZI》" The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies no.35(2017) : 303-325.doi: 10.18212/cccs.2017..35.012