A Study on Application of Cohesion and Coherence to Subject Appearing and Disappearing in Chinese Writing Text by Koreans

Yun, yu-jeong

doi:10.18212/cccs.2018..41.011

The purpose of this paper is to study the using patterns of coherence devices to secure the cohesion of texts in relation to the appearing and disappearing of subject in Chinese writing texts by Koreans have advanced Chinese level. This paper divided the coherence devices into five kinds such as ‘Reference, Substitution, Ellipsis, Conjunction, Lexical Coherence’. Lexical Coherence is classified as homotype reiteration, partial homotype reiteration, synonym and generic term. The results of the analysis are as follows: First, in Chinese writing text, Koreans mainly use lexical coherence such as homotype reiteration, partial homotype reiteration with respect to subject appearance, and occasionally use reference and substitution. Second, in Chinese writing text, Koreans mainly use progressive ellipsis or author ellipsis in relation to the disappearance of subject, occasionally use general ellipsis or dialogic ellipsis, and rarely use regressive ellipsis. Third, the most prevalent principle of appearing subject in writing text is the meaning response of subject and predicate. If the subject of a predicate in a sentence is different from that of a predicate in other sentence, if the subject of the predicate is different from the subject of the nested clause, if the subject of the predicate is different from that of a predicate in a complex sentence, the subject must appear. However, Koreans often fail to make proper use of the subject corresponding to each predicate. Fourth, even though the subject of the predicate in the front and back sentences is the same and has already appeared in the context, if there is a distance between them and there are other interference terms in the middle, communication with the reader may not be smooth, so it is preferable to make the subject appear.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (1)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (27)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[journal] 瞿宗德 / 1997 / 漢語中主語隱現句及其英譯 / 上海海運學院學報 (2) : 106~114

[thesis] 金慧婷 / 2014 / 篇章語言學視角下的中韓主語省略對比硏究 / 博士 / 上海外國語大學

[journal] 廖秋忠 / 1986 / 現代漢語篇章中指同的表達 / 中國語文 (2) : 88~96

[book] 馬明艶 / 2015 / 二語學習者漢語語篇構建硏究 / 中國社會科學出版社

[journal] 潘海華 / 2002 / 優選論與漢語主語的確認 / 中國語文 (1) : 3~13

[journal] 方梅 / 1985 / 關於複句中分句主語省略的問題 / 延邊大學學報 (1) : 44~54

[book] 徐糾糾 / 2003 / 現代漢語回指硏究 / 中國社會科學出版社

[thesis] 연동숙 / 2005 / 한국어와 중국어의 텍스트 결속 대조 연구 : 제보 기능 신문 텍스트를 중심으로 / 박사 / 한국외국어대학교 대학원

[journal] 兪敦雨 / 1987 / 主語省略的幾種特殊方式 / 邏輯與語言學習 (4) : 43~45

[book] 劉月華 / 2001 / 實用現代漢語語法 / 商務印書館

[book] 이관규 / 2005 / 학교 문법론 / 월인

[journal] 이동혁 / 2009 / A Study on the Errors of the Subject Expression in Writing / 한말연구 / 한말연구학회 (25) : 191~220 / 10.16876/klrc.2009..25.191

[journal] 이민우 / 2006 / A Study on Subject Ellipsis Based on Re-definition of Subject in Mandarin Chinese / 중국언어연구 / 한국중국언어학회 (22) : 97~133

[book] 이석규 / 2003 / 텍스트 분석의 실제 / 역락

[book] 張德祿 / 2003 / 語篇連貫與衔接理論的發展及應用 / 上海外語敎育出版社

[book] 정희모 / 2015 / 대학 글쓰기 연구와 텍스트 해석 / 보고사

[journal] 주회민 / 2013 / A Comparative Analysis on Cohesion Methods of Korean and Chinese Speech Texts(Ⅰ). / 한국어학 / 한국어학회 61 : 339~367

[thesis] 陳偉英 / 2008 / 漢語主語省略的認知語用硏究 / 博士 / 浙江大學

[journal] 華宏儀 / 2001 / 主語承主語省略探討 / 烟台師範學院學報 (1) : 83~89

[journal] 華宏儀 / 2002 / 主語承非主語省略探討 / 烟台師範學院學報 (2) : 88~95

[book] 한국텍스트언어학회 / 2009 / 텍스트언어학의 이해 / 박이정

[book] 胡壯麟 / 1994 / 語篇的衔接餘連貫3 / 上海外語敎育出版社

[book] 黃國文 / 1988 / 語篇分析槪要 / 湖南敎育出版社

[book] Ariel, M / 1990 / Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedent / Routledge

[book] Beaugrande, R. / 1991 / 談話⋅텍스트言語學入門 / 양영각

[book] Halliday, M.A.K / 1976 / Cohesion in English / Group Ltd

[web] / BCC語料庫 / http://bcc.blcu.edu.cn

이 논문은 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 작성되었습니다.

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status