According to PAM, categorization assimilation is happened at the very short period of learning. That’s why we need to know how Korean listen and comprehend Chinese sound when they haven’t learn Chinese. It is important to know the naive Korean’s perception to Chinese initial consonants. Because only after we know how they choose the category of the Chinese consonants, we might be able to presume how the Korean Chinese language learner construct Chinese consonants category in their cognitive system.
If we know know how naive Korean choose the category of a certain Chinese consonant, and if we observe the Chinese language learner’s choice for consonant category we can compare the results and find out whether there are any differences. Then it might be more easy to deduce how Korean listen and comprehend Chinese consonant sounds or it is possible for us to assume there will be difficulty to learn that sounds or not.
However, in Korea, there are almost no research has been done to the naive Korean who doesn’t have Chinese Experience.
In this article, we will review the previous phonetic researches of Korean and Chinese consonant. Then, we carry on the perceptual experiment to 100 Koreans and we analyze what characteristic Korean have when categorizing Chinese consonants. As a result, this paper proved two facts related to the previous research.
First, there are difficulties in choosing a category of ‘c, ch, l, r, sh, z, zh’, which can lead to listening comprehension difficulties even at the learning stage. Second, unlike to the result of previous studies, Koreans perceived the Chinese plosive as a fortis regardless of Tones.
[book]
Best
/ 1995
/ direct realist view of cross-language speech perception, Speech perception and linguistic experience, issues in cross language research
/ York Press
[other]
Lee, SangIm
/ 2018
/ Contrastive context effects of tone modulated by second language experience : evidence from Korean L2 learners of Mandarin Chinese
/ 중국학회 발표문
[thesis]
李善熙
/ 2010
/ 韓國學習者習得漢語元音音系範疇的程序及特点
/ 박사
/ 北京語言大學
@article{ART002408133}, author={LEE SUN HEE}, title={A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization}, journal={The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies }, issn={1598-8503}, year={2018}, number={42}, pages={55-74}, doi={10.18212/cccs.2018..42.003}
TY - JOUR AU - LEE SUN HEE TI - A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization JO - The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies PY - 2018 VL - null IS - 42 PB - The Society For Chinese Cultural Studies SP - 55 EP - 74 SN - 1598-8503 AB - According to PAM, categorization assimilation is happened at the very short period of learning. That’s why we need to know how Korean listen and comprehend Chinese sound when they haven’t learn Chinese. It is important to know the naive Korean’s perception to Chinese initial consonants. Because only after we know how they choose the category of the Chinese consonants, we might be able to presume how the Korean Chinese language learner construct Chinese consonants category in their cognitive system.
If we know know how naive Korean choose the category of a certain Chinese consonant, and if we observe the Chinese language learner’s choice for consonant category we can compare the results and find out whether there are any differences. Then it might be more easy to deduce how Korean listen and comprehend Chinese consonant sounds or it is possible for us to assume there will be difficulty to learn that sounds or not.
However, in Korea, there are almost no research has been done to the naive Korean who doesn’t have Chinese Experience.
In this article, we will review the previous phonetic researches of Korean and Chinese consonant. Then, we carry on the perceptual experiment to 100 Koreans and we analyze what characteristic Korean have when categorizing Chinese consonants. As a result, this paper proved two facts related to the previous research.
First, there are difficulties in choosing a category of ‘c, ch, l, r, sh, z, zh’, which can lead to listening comprehension difficulties even at the learning stage. Second, unlike to the result of previous studies, Koreans perceived the Chinese plosive as a fortis regardless of Tones. KW - Chinese consonants;Categorization;PAM;perceptual assimilation;intial consonants DO - 10.18212/cccs.2018..42.003 ER -
LEE SUN HEE. (2018). A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization. The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies , 42, 55-74.
LEE SUN HEE. 2018, "A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization", The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies , no.42, pp.55-74. Available from: doi:10.18212/cccs.2018..42.003
LEE SUN HEE "A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization" The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies 42 pp.55-74 (2018) : 55.
LEE SUN HEE. A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization. 2018; 42 : 55-74. Available from: doi:10.18212/cccs.2018..42.003
LEE SUN HEE. "A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization" The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies no.42(2018) : 55-74.doi: 10.18212/cccs.2018..42.003
LEE SUN HEE. A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization. The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies , 42, 55-74. doi: 10.18212/cccs.2018..42.003
LEE SUN HEE. A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization. The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies . 2018; 42 55-74. doi: 10.18212/cccs.2018..42.003
LEE SUN HEE. A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization. 2018; 42 : 55-74. Available from: doi:10.18212/cccs.2018..42.003
LEE SUN HEE. "A Study on the Korean’s Perception of Chinese Initial Consonant - Related with Consonants Categorization" The Journal of Chinese Cultural Studies no.42(2018) : 55-74.doi: 10.18212/cccs.2018..42.003