Written Corrective Feedback on College English Writing
DOI : 10.21049/ccs.2009.13.1.229
Publisher : Center for Cross Culture Studies
Research Area : Literature
-
This paper studies the effects of written corrective feedback on non‐ English majors’ English writing at college in China. The experiment lasted 8 weeks and involved 45 students, divided into three groups: the direct feedback, the indirect feedback and the control group according to their pretest scores and the types of feedback they received. Each group was composed of 15 subjects. Based on an analysis of the experimental and control group data, the current study showed that the students who received form‐focused written corrective feedback over 8 weeks reduced linguistic errors greatly in their subsequent writings and the students who got indirect feedback did better than those who had direct feedback. In addition, it was found that content‐focused written corrective feedback can significantly enhance the content of students’ writing whether the feedback was given in a detailed way or general way.
-
[journal] Ashwell, T. / 2000 / Patterns of teacher response to students writing in a multipledraft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method [J]? / Journal of Second Language Writing 9 : 227~257
[journal] Chandler, J. / 2003 / The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the linguistic accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J] / Journal of Second Language Writing 12 : 267~296
[journal] Chen, X.X. / 2008 / The Effects of modified output on the target language development [J] / Foreign Language Teaching and Research 40 : 279~286
[book] Fathman, A. / 1990 / Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content in : Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom [C] / Cambridge University Press : 178~190
[journal] Ferris, D. R. / 1995 / Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their most serious and frequent errors [J]? / CATESOL Journal 8 : 41~62
[journal] Ferris, D. R. / 1999 / The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott [J] / Journal of Second Language Writing 8 : 1~11
[book] Ferris, D. R. / 2003 / Responding to writing in : Exploring second language writing / Cambridge University Press : 119~140
[confproc] Ferris, D. R. / 2000 / Perspectives, problems, and practices in treating written error / In Colloquium presented at International TESOL Convention : 14~18
[journal] Ferris, D. R. / 2001 / Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be [J]? / Journal of Second Language Writing 10 : 161~184
[journal] Frantzen, D. / 1995 / The effects of grammar supplementation on written linguistic accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course [J] / Modern Language Journal 79 : 329~344
[book] Frantzen, D. / 1987 / Learner self‐correction of written compositions: What does it show us? in : Foreign language learning: a research perspective / Newbury House : 92~107
[journal] Guénette, D. / 2007 / Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing [J] / Journal of Second Language Writing 16 : 40~53
[journal] Guo, C. H. / 2006 / Teacher‐written feedback research on L2 student writing abroad―Perspectives and pedagogical implications [J] / Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 29 : 59~63
[journal] Hedgcock, J. / 1994 / Feedback on Feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing [J] / Journal of Second Language Writing 3 : 141~163
[journal] Hyland, F. / 2001 / Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback [J] / Journal of Second Language Writing 10 : 185~212
[journal] Kepner, C. G. / 1991 / An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second‐language writing skills [J] / Modern Language Journal 75 : 305~313
[journal] Lalande, J. F. / 1982 / Reducing composition errors: An experiment [J] / Modern Language Journal 66 : 140~149
[journal] Lee, I. / 1997 / ESL learners’ performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for college‐level teaching [J] / System 25 : 465~477
[journal] Lyster, R. / 1997 / Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms [J] / Studies in Second Language acquisition 19 : 37~66
[journal] Rahimi, M. / 2009 / The role of teacher’s writing corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL learners’ writing linguistic accuracy over time: Is learner’s mother tongue relevant [J]? / Reading and Writing 22 : 219~243
[journal] Robb, T. / 1986 / Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality [J] / TESOL Quarterly 20 : 83~95
[journal] Schmidt, R. / 1990 / The role of consciousness in second language learning [J] / Applied linguistics 11 : 206~226
[journal] Schulz, R. / 2001 / Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USAColumbia [J] / Modern language Journal 85 : 244~258
[journal] Semke, H. D. / 1984 / Effects of the red pen [J] / Foreign Language Annals 17 : 195~202
[journal] Sheppard, K. / 1992 / Two feedback types: Do they make a difference [J]? / RELC Journal 23 : 103~110
[journal] Truscott, J. / 1996 / The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes [J] / Language Learning 46 : 327~369
[journal] Truscott, J. / 1999 / The case for “the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris [J] / Journal of Second Language Writing 8 : 111~122
[journal] Truscott, J. / 2001 / Selecting errors for selective error correction [J] / Concentric: Studies in English Literature Linguistics 27 : 225~240
[journal] Truscott, J. / 2007 / The effects of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately [J] / Journal of Second Language Writing
[journal] Yang, J. Q. / 1996 / Improving the effectiveness of the feedback mechanism in assessing English writing―experiments and analysis [J] / Foreign Language World 63 : 41~45
-
KCI Citation (0)
105 Viewed
Print this page
Download PDF