The Task of World Literature and the Problem of Universality

Sangjin Park

doi:10.21049/ccs.2011.23..81

The term of world literature is now becoming an issue and lens through which we need to rethink the value of literature on a more universal dimension so as to imagine newly the location of the local or regional literature that has been alienated from the field of world literature. This kind of recognition leads us to consider the term world literature in relation to globalization and universality and to locate it on a problematical territory rather than to understand it in the traditional and Western way. Therefore the concept of world literature is now given to us as a task to resolve from our particular, or more precisely, peripheral context. The peripheral context could best operate as a possibility of reforming the West-centered order of world literature particularly in the way in which world literature obtains a more universal value. When we discuss world literature we need to consider the way of practice to re-highlight the possibility of periphery and pre-modernity without neglecting the 'light' of modernity and center. In this respect, the discourse of 'East Asia' may be useful for a transnational approach to world literature which focuses on the criticism of all kinds of centrism by foregrounding the concepts of othering and de-homogenization. For this I emphasize the attitude and methodology of 'post' which includes the power of othering and de-homogenization. The 'posty' theories such as post-colonialism, post-structuralism, post-nationalism and post-humanism allow us to indicate properly and acutely our aim by means of freer play of thought and at the same time more just definition and practice of our thought; that is, only by embracing both indication and play can we maintain the universal value of world literature. Here we can say that the global and local enterprise of ethics is the fundamental basis of world literature.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (5)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (19)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[book] John Guillory / 1993 / Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation / University of Chicago Press : 55~

[book] Pascale Casanova / 2007 / The World Republic of Letters / Harvard University Press

[book] 박성창 / 2010 / 비교문학의 도전 / 민음사

[book] 유희석 / 2010 / 세계문학의 개념들: 한반도적 시각의 확보를 위하여, In 세계문학론 / 창비

[journal] 박상진 / 2006 / 동아시아에서의 단테의 수용과 변용을 통한 문학의 보편성과 근대성 / 문학과경계 (겨울) : 77~96

[journal] 박상진 / 2007 / 글로벌 시대에 묻는 이론의 자리: 새로운 보편주의를 위하여 / 세계의 문학 (124) : 169~182

[book] 박상진 / 2010 / 비동일화의 지평:문학의 보편성과 한국문학 / 고려대출판부

[book] 박상진 / 단테의 <신곡> 연구 / 아카넷

[book] 윤지관 / 2010 / 한국문학의 세계화를 둘러싼 쟁점들, In 세계문학론 / 창비

[book] Kwame Anthony Appiah / 1995 / Geist Stories, In Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism / Johns Hoptkins University Press

[book] Rey Chow / 1995 / In the Name of Comparative Literature, In Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism / Johns Hoptkins University Press

[book] 한애경 / 2008 / 경계선 넘기: 새로운 문학연구의 모색 / 인간사랑

[book] David Damrosch / 2003 / What is World Literature? / Princeton University Press

[book] 가라타니 고진 / 2009 / 내이션과 미학 / 도서출판 b

[book] 백낙청 / 2010 / 지구화 시대의 민족과 문학, In 세계문학론 / 창비

[book] 김영희 / 2010 / 지금 우리에게 세계문학은 무엇인가, In 세계문학론 / 창비

[book] 가야트리 스피박 / 2011 / 다른 여러 아시아 / 울력

[book] 임마누엘 월러스틴 / 2008 / 유럽적 보편주의: 권력의 레토릭 / 창비

[book] 김용규 / 2008 / 백색신화: 서양이론과 유럽중심주의 비판 / 경성대출판부

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status