The Definition of a Catastrophe as Trauma by Visual Media and the Resultant Problems: A Critical Analysis of the “Antimimetic Theory"

Gilwan, Seoh

doi:10.21049/ccs.2016.43..265

This essay begins by discussing the issue of the definition of a catastrophe as a trauma by visual media and the problems that result. We assume a concrete approach towards these problems by examining the process through which 9/11 was defined as a “national trauma” in the exclusion of images of bodies falling from towers, which were some of the most shocking images in the media coverage of 9/11. The choice to exclude images of falling men from American visual media representations of 9/11 goes hand in hand with the tendencies of a contemporary trauma theory. This essay assumes that the representations in the U.S visual media depend on “antimimetic theory," one of the leading contemporary trauma theories, in order to validate its logic, and examines the limitations and problems of the theory. This work aims to examine the issue of the definition of a catastrophe as trauma by visual media on the basis on the “antimimetic theory" and the danger that results. Because the antimimetic theory, which the visual media in the United States uses to define 9/11 as trauma, emphasizes literal and unmediated representation of an external event, it lacks an understanding of the human aspects of the event. There is no way to intervene in the construction and interpretation of the trauma. As a result, the theory discourages active attempts to find a solution to the problems of the people directly connected with the event. Thus, it provides an opening for manipulative intervention of an external power. This essay attempts to provide a critical analysis of the “antimimetic theory” in order to help people who witness catastrophic events through various types of visual media, and to seek an alternative means of experiencing and responding to the trauma, that does not stem from the perspective of specific media outlets or external powers.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)
REFERENCES (17)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[book] Edkins, Jenny / 2003 / Trauma and the Memory of Politics / Cambridge UP

[journal] Elsaesser, Thomas / 2001 / Postmodernism as Mourning Work / Screen 42(2)

[book] Frost, Laura / 2008 / Still Life, Literature After 9/11 / Routlege

[book] Geralch, Nathalie / 2014 / Falling in the Post-9/11 Nove / Grin Verlag

[book] Gibbs, Allan / 2014 / Contemporary American Narrative / Edinburgh UP

[journal] Horowitz, Mardri, J. / 1969 / Psychic Trauma: Return of Image after a stress Film / Archive of General Psychiatry 20

[web] Junod, Tom / 2014 / The Falling Man / Esquire

[book] Kaplan, E. Ann / 2005 / Trauma Culture: The Politics of Terror and Loss in Media and Literature / Rutgers UP

[book] Keniston, Ann / 2008 / Representing 9/11: Literature and Resistance, Literature After 9/11 / Routlege

[book] Laub, Dori / 2003 / September 11, 2001-An Event without a Voice, 204, Trauma At Home: After 9/11 / U of Nebraska

[book] Lazarus, Richard / 2007 / A Laboratory Approach to the Dynamics of Psychological Stress, American Psychologist 19(1964) / Princeton UP

[book] Meek, Allen / 2010 / Trauma and Media: Theories, Histories, and Images / Routledge

[book] Modlinger, Martin / 2011 / Introduction, Other People's Pain:Narratives of Trauma and the Question of Ethics / Peter Lang

[book] Radstone, Susannah / 2011 / Trauma Studies: Context, Politics, Ethics, Other People's Pain: Narratives of Trauma and the Question of Ethics / Peter Lang

[book] Radstone, Susannah / 2000 / Screening Trauma: Forest Gump, Film, and Memory, Memory and Methodology / Berg

[book] Redfield, Marc / 2009 / The Rhetoric of Terror: Reflection of 9/11 and the War on Terror / Fordham UP

[book] Smelser, Neil J. / 2001 / September 11, 2001, as Cultural Trauma, Trauma At Home:After 9/11 / U of Nebraska P

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status