The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’

Gong JianZe; JunSungKon

doi:10.21049/ccs.2017.46..435

@article{ART002207889},
author={Gong JianZe and JunSungKon},
title={The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’},
journal={Cross-Cultural Studies},
issn={1598-0685},
year={2017},
volume={46},
pages={435-463},
doi={10.21049/ccs.2017.46..435}

TY - JOUR
AU - Gong JianZe
AU - JunSungKon
TI - The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’
JO - Cross-Cultural Studies
PY - 2017
VL - 46
IS - null
PB - Center for Cross Culture Studies
SP - 435
EP - 463
SN - 1598-0685
AB - This paper aims to identify the structural characteristics of Okawa Syumei(大川周明), Wakamiya Unosuke(若宮卯之助) and Okakura Tensin(岡倉天心). In fact, after Okawa Syumei studied the Principles of Wakamiya Unosuke and Okakura Tensin, he derived a conclusion and wrote a book named "yeolseongjeon". This book talks about the emperor dynasty. Based on this, the theory presented by Wakamiya Unosuke and Okakura Tensin described the characteristics of the East European culture. Okakura Tensin crossed the western part and discovered that western culture is only western culture and not a universal culture. Western culture has developed from its own experience. Wakamiya Unosuke translated a book by William Knox, The spirt of the orient. They have the same point of view, but they have a different culture and they must follow their own culture. Okakura Tensin insisted that culture is dynamic and it improves by adapting different cultures of different countries. Wakamiya appealed and he opposed Tensin's studies about culture. Wakamiya's definition of culture has not changed or is fixed from the past, which still exists in the modern times. Culture must be cultivated and it must be introduced to people who have forgotten their own culture. Despite such methodological differences, the commonality between Okakura and Wakamiya is that Western civilization is nothing more than a regional culture, as the West is not a universal civilization, but as a whole, it is a regional culture. Okawa Syumei learned the Okakura and Wakamiya's theory about culture and derived a conclusion. He stated that both opinions are correct as culture can be adapted as explained by Okakura. For example, Japanese people are now adapting and embracing the culture of Chinese people and Indian people. On the other hand, he also learned Wakamiya Unosuke’s theory that culture does not change. Japanese have their own culture that was created in the past or it was developed by their ancestors; for example, the emperor dynasty. Okawa Syumei learned different cultures of different countries and Japanese people are adapting those cultures, and Wakamiya stated that the emperor dynasty must be instilled and it must be universal. Japanese emperors have different cultures, especially the Meiji emperor who is willing to accept different cultures of different countries. Finally, he claimed that the emperor dynasty created a new Japanese civilization and they are now embracing the new adapted culture.
KW - Okawa Shumei;Okakura Tensin;Wakamiya Unosuke;GokuTai;The imperial line
DO - 10.21049/ccs.2017.46..435
ER -

Gong JianZe and JunSungKon. (2017). The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’. Cross-Cultural Studies, 46, 435-463.

Gong JianZe and JunSungKon. 2017, "The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’", Cross-Cultural Studies, vol.46, pp.435-463. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2017.46..435

Gong JianZe, JunSungKon "The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’" Cross-Cultural Studies 46 pp.435-463 (2017) : 435.

Gong JianZe, JunSungKon. The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’. 2017; 46 435-463. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2017.46..435

Gong JianZe and JunSungKon. "The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’" Cross-Cultural Studies 46(2017) : 435-463.doi: 10.21049/ccs.2017.46..435

Gong JianZe; JunSungKon. The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’. Cross-Cultural Studies, 46, 435-463. doi: 10.21049/ccs.2017.46..435

Gong JianZe; JunSungKon. The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’. Cross-Cultural Studies. 2017; 46 435-463. doi: 10.21049/ccs.2017.46..435

Gong JianZe, JunSungKon. The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’. 2017; 46 435-463. Available from: doi:10.21049/ccs.2017.46..435

Gong JianZe and JunSungKon. "The Structure of Trans-Culture and the ‘Emperor of Civilization’" Cross-Cultural Studies 46(2017) : 435-463.doi: 10.21049/ccs.2017.46..435

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status