A Study on Chinese Books mentioned in the Ŭmbinghaengjŏngnyŏk

kyounghun Lee

doi:10.15792/clsyn..81.201908.307

This study reviews the acceptance attitude of Chosun intellectuals about the Chinese books at that time through the assessment of Chinese books by Moksan in Ŭmbinghaengjŏngnyŏk, examines their views on the same books before and after them, including him and examine the changes in attitudes toward understanding Chinese books and the Chinese studies during the Chosun Dynasty. After looking through the records of the Chinese books of Moksan, I came to the following conclusion. First, when it comes to the books already have known to the Moksan, it has been summarized as if it were to release the books it had contacted without any expressing a positive or negative opinion. They did not feel the need to express their views on books that had already been introduced to Chosun and could only be known by their titles, or were excluded from the list of new interests to express theirs. Second, he expressed his views on the books he first encountered in traveling, explaining both the contents of the author and the book in parallel. The criteria for him to evaluating books in the past depended on the importance of orthodox Neo-Confucianism(性理學) and Confucian significance with Chu Hsi(朱子), at the core. Rich colored in Yugwanghak (陸王學), books of anti-Chu Hsi studies were dismissed as worthless. He also expressed his views of affirmation and negation only when asked whether the author’s ideas were descendants of Royal’s command with the banner of ones’ mission’s report, and that they should be based on the observance of fidelity of Royal’s command, the source of small Sinocentrism(小中華思想) that of importance to cultural Chinese ideas, not geographical Chinese ones, and should not violate Chosun’s principles of Neo-Confucianism, negate and attack on the Cheng-Zhu Confucianism (程朱理學) as they were known. Third, the route through that Moksan came into contact with the books was by looking at the calligraphy owned by a subordinate officer of Nanjing, purchasing it through a librarian from Jiangxi, or obtaining a book list from a bookstore and borrowing it through the librarian. To conclude, this study will not only provide a partial picture of the attitude of accepting Chinese books per period, but it will also be meaningful to examine how Chinese studies are accepted differently depending on the situation of Chosun.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (3)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (21)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[other] 姜世晃 / 豹菴遺稿 권5, 장서각 소장본

[thesis] 김미순 / 2011 / 『경자연행잡지』를 통해 본 이의현의 청 문물 인식 / 석사 / 경북대학교 교육대학원

[book] 신익철 / 2013 / 연행사와 북경천주당 / 보고사

[book] 신익철 / 2014 / 18세기 연행록 기사 집성, 서적･서화편 / 한국학중앙연구원 출판부

[journal] 安正燻 / 2003 / A Study of ‘Chinese-traditional Encyclopedia(類書)’ in the Field of Chinese Literature and Bibliography / 중국문학 / 한국중국어문학회 40 : 49~64

[journal] 이경훈 / 2017 / A Riview on 《Umbing-haengchenglyuk》 / 중국학논총 / 한국중국문화학회 (56) : 201~217

[book] 이기경 / 1990 / 木山藁 / 세원사

[other] 이기경 / ≪木山藁≫, 宗孫李柱成氏家保藏本

[book] 이영춘 / 2016 / 1756년의 북경이야기(목산의 ≪음빙행정력飮氷行程曆≫ / 교육과학사

[book] 임기중 / 2014 / 燕行錄硏究層位 / 학고방

[journal] 임홍태 / 2013 / A Study of Li Fu's Appreciation of Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan's Philosophy - Centering around Zhuziwannianquanlun / 한국철학논집 / 한국철학사연구회 (37) : 159~195 / 10.35504/kph.2013..37.006

[journal] 정우봉 / 2015 / A Study On Acceptance of Chen ji-ru in Joseon Dynasty / 한국한문학연구 / 한국한문학회 (57) : 233~263 / 10.30527/klcc..57.201503.008

[book] 정광충 / 1976 / 연행일록 / 민족문화추진회

[book] 한국문학연구소 연행록해제팀 / 2003 / 국학고전 연행록해제1 / 한국문학연구소

[book] 罗积勇 / 2010 / ≪類編標註文公先生經濟文衡≫編者考辨 / 中國長江學術

[thesis] 宋鳳林 / 2012 / ≪路史≫的文獻價値 / 碩士 / 天津師範大學

[journal] 呂振宇 / 2014 / ≪經濟文衡≫版本述考 / 歷史文獻硏究 (01)

[journal] 朱仙林 / 2012 / 羅泌≪路史≫版本考辨 / 古籍整理硏究學刊

[web] / 조선왕조실록 / http://sillok.history.go.kr/

[web] / 한국고전종합DB / http://db.itkc.or.kr/

[web] / KRPIA / http://www.krpia.co.kr/

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status