Indirect Negation In Chinese : A Game Strategy In Verbal Communication Based On The Non-Correspondence

Su Dan; Lee，Woo-Cheol

doi:10.15792/clsyn..86.202104.167

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Journal of Chinese Language and Literature 2021 KCI Impact Factor : 0.2

Korean | English

pISSN : 1225-083X

http://journal.kci.go.kr/clsyn

BACK
TOP

Home > Explore Content > All Issues > Article View

7 of 12

Indirect Negation In Chinese : A Game Strategy In Verbal Communication Based On The Non-Correspondence

Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
2021, (86), pp.167-189
DOI : 10.15792/clsyn..86.202104.167

Publisher : Chinese Literary Society Of Yeong Nam
Research Area : Chinese Language and Literature

Received : March 10, 2021
Accepted : April 19, 2021
Published : April 30, 2021

Su Dan ¹, Lee，Woo-Cheol ²

¹경북대학교 중어중문학과
²경북대학교

ABSTRACT
열림/닫힘 버튼

In previous studies, there are still some deficiencies in the explanation of indirect negation speech act and there are still some doubts about the nature and the cause of indirect negation phenomenon in previous studies. This article believes the Game Theory provides a better perspective for the emergence of indirect negation. The purpose of this article is to explain that the carrier of the negative meaning of indirect negation is a kind of non-correspondence. This non-correspondence reflects the following three aspects: the non-correspondence of communicative intentions between communicators, the non-correspondence of the directedness of the focus of proposition, and the non-correspondence between the language table and utterance meaning. The reason for this non-correspondence is that the communicator chooses a “profit maximization” strategy through the calculation and comparison of costs and benefits. This article, from the perspective of game theory, fully reflects the essential characteristics of the phenomenon of indirect negation, which is a kind of game theoretical strategy to communication based on the non-correspondence.
KEYWORDS
열림/닫힘 버튼

Indirect negation, Game Theory, Non-correspondence, Commnication strategy

Statistics

76 Viewed

14 Downloaded

Tools

Print this page

Download PDF

Export Citation

Sharing

Facebook

Twitter

Issue List

Vol. No.89

Vol. No.88

Vol. No.87

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)
REFERENCES (16)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[journal] 陈建先 / 2018 / 博弈理论框架: 一个理论体系的建构构 / 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学) (1)

[book] 何兆熊 / 2000 / 新编语用学概要 / 上海外语教育出版社

[journal] 李元胜 / 2012 / 言语交际博弈论研究管窥 / 湖北民族学院学报(社会科学版) (2)

[journal] 钱冠连 / 1987 / 言语功能假信息:兼论Grice“合作原则”的拯救 / 外国语 (5)

[journal] 소단 / 2019 / A cognitive study on indirect negation of “xiang duo le(想多了)” / 중국어문학 / 영남중국어문학회 (82) : 55~77 / 10.15792/clsyn..82.201912.55

[thesis] 王志英 / 2012 / 现代汉语特殊否定现象认知研究 / 博士 / 上海师范大学

[thesis] 吴炳章 / 2009 / 交际博弈论——一种认知语用学的理论框架 / 博士 / 河南大学

[journal] 徐鹰 / 2014 / 论语言的博弈观 / 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版) (4)

[journal] 袁毓琳 / 2012 / 动词内隐性否定的语义层次和溢出条件 / 中国语文 (2)

[journal] 曾莉 / 2014 / 理解间接否定言语行为的思维模式研究 / 语言研究 (2)

[journal] 占彬 / 2007 / 从语用学的角度看言语交际中的语言经济性 / 中南民族大学学报 (人文社会科学版) (27)

[thesis] Franke Michael / 2009 / Signal to act: Game theory in pragmatics / University of Amsterdam

[book] Grice, H. P / 1975 / Logic and Conversation / P. Cole and J. Morgan

[journal] Sperber, D / 1987 / Precis of Relevance / Behavioral and Brain Sciences (10)

[book] Levinson, S. C / 2001 / Pragmatics / 外语教学与研究出版社

[book] Morgan, J. L / 1978 / Two Types of Convention in Indirect Speech Acts