Essay on *Kumāraśarman(鳩摩羅設摩)’s Wensong(文頌, kāvya) and *Śaṇḍīlya(扇帙略)’s Lunmen(論門, *vāda-marga)

Kwon Oh Min

doi:10.29213/crbs..8.201012.107

In the history of Buddhist thought, Sautrāntika/Dārṣṭāntika is still behind a veil. This assay is the speculation of their origin and development through *Kumāraśarman’s Wensong(文頌) and *Śaṇḍīlya’s Lunmen(論門) referred by Saṃghabhadra. Following are summaries. 1. Saṃghabhadra referred *Kumāraśarman’s Wensong and *Śaṇḍīlya’s Lunmen in the nuance that they’re Sthavira Śrīlāta’s previous master(so to speak pūrvācārya) on the Abhidharmanyāyānusāraśāstra, as he reproached the Śrīlāta’s critique to the theory of five cause of the Sarvāstivāda. 2.1. According to the Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣaśāstra Wensong(文頌) is beyond the truth because it is discussion of style which explain tripiṭaka of the holy truth by the worldly metaphors(dṛṣṭānta), or which is like a hymn to Buddha that poet himself integrated in exaggerating metaphors. And according to the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya the latter one is translated words of ‘kāvya’. 2.2. In light of these Wensong is the worldly truth distinguished the holy truth, so to speak metaphors, fable etc style like a Kumāralāta’s Kalpanāmaṇḍitikā( or Mahālaṁkārasūtraśāstra) or kāvya style like a Aśvaghoṣa’s Buddhacarita. Thus kavi(文頌者) *Kumāraśarman which Saṃghabhadra referred could be inferred that it is forerunner of Dārṣṭāntika, Sthavira Śrīlāta etc. 3.1. *Śaṇḍīlya is referred in an episode of sthāpanīya-vyākaraṇa(a question which one should not answer), in the course of discussing about four kinds of dialogue methods(四種問記) in the Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣa. And *Śaṇḍīlya’s definition of question in his treatise(śāstra) is quoted in the course of discussion talking about dialogue methods between Saṃghabhadra and someone(Rāma, according to Yaśomitra etc) in the Abhidharmanyāyānusāra. 3.2. A Lunmen(論門) according to Harivarman, mean ways of discussion, and his the theory of Two Truth(二諦說) is based on the way of worldly common(世間門) and the way of ultimately truth(第一義門) which are one of ways. Following this “Self exist”(saṁvṛti-satya) or “Self do not exist” (paramārtha-satya), those words are all possible. 3.3. *Śaṇḍīlya also says that none of them aren’t denied based on two meanings in his definition of question. (So his Lunmen too could be about ways of discussion/dialogue.) Rāma who told this also said “Self can be what exist or what do not exist”, Harivarman and Kumāralāta explained these through metaphor of ‘tiger put his cub on his mouth(牝虎銜子)’ 4.1. Dārṣṭāntika on the Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣa neither did only use metaphor(dṛṣṭānta) nor did use a lot more metaphor than any other sects, although they criticized Sarvāstivāda’s holy truth(tripiṭaka) by the metaphors. Nevertheless they were called Dārṣṭāntika is because it originated from kavi like *Kumāraśarman. 4.2. Dārṣṭāntika on the Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣa and the Abhidharmanyāyānusāra has no little discordance. Saṃghabhadra also call Dārṣṭāntika not only in singular term but also in specific term and generic term, or indicate Sthavira Śrīlāta as ‘some present Dārṣṭāntika’. So Dārṣṭāntika on the Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣa is not Sautrāntika directly, and Dārṣṭāntika also maybe not the singular pedigree. 4.3. Presumably, in Dārṣṭāntika there are at least ① kavi(文頌者) pedigree of worldly metaphors(dṛṣṭānta) which succeed to *Kumāraśarman- Kumāralāta/Aśvaghoṣa, ② pedigree that emphasize a method of discussion/ dialogue which succeed to *Śaṇḍīlya-Vasumitra(the author of Paripṛcchā)- Harivarman(-Rāma), ③ Sautrāntika pedigree which succeed to *Kumāraśarman/ Śaṇḍīlya-some Dārṣṭāntika on the Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣa-Sthavira Śrīlāta-Sthavirapākṣika such as Rāma/Vasuvarman. Although these three have different pedigrees and views, they had common basis, ‘Dārṣṭāntika’, so their relevance may not be denied. 4.4. However considering their prominent tendency, Kumāralāta and Aśvaghoṣa continuously succeeded tendency of Wensong(kāvya), a worldly metaphors(dṛṣṭānta). In contrast to Harivarman claiming ‘all existence are empty(一切皆空)’ according to the way of ultimately truth, Sthavira Śrīlāta’s sect denied theory of Buddha-śāsana of the Sarvāstivāda, and called themselves as Sautrāntika under the motto of ‘we only take the sūtras which revealed by Buddha himself as a valid means of cognition’.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)
REFERENCES (63)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[other] / 『百喩經』(T: 『大正藏』4)

[other] / 『大莊嚴經論』(T: 『大正藏』4)

[other] / 『品類足論』(T: 『大正藏』26)

[other] / 『大毘婆沙論』(T: 『大正藏』27)

[other] / 『阿毘曇毘婆沙論』(T: 『大正藏』28)

[other] / 『俱舍論』(T: 『大正藏』29)

[other] / 『順正理論』(T: 『大正藏』29)

[other] / 『瑜伽師地論』(T: 『大正藏』30)

[other] / 『大乘成業論』(T: 『大正藏』31)

[other] / 『阿毘達磨雜集論』(T: 『大正藏』31)

[other] / 『成實論』(T: 『大正藏』32)

[other] / 『異部宗輪論』(T: 『大正藏』49)

[other] / 『俱舍論記』(T: 『大正藏』41)

[other] / 『三論玄義』(T: 『大正藏』45)

[other] / 『一切經音義』(T: 『大正藏』54)

[other] / 『出三藏記集』(T: 『大正藏』55)

[book] Pradhan, P. / 1976 / Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam of Vasubandhu / Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute

[book] Wogihara, U. / 1989 / Abhidharmakośavyākhyā / Sankibo Buddhist Book Store

[book] Lama Chimpa / 1990 / Tāranātha's History of Buddhism in India / Motilal Banarsidass

[book] 加藤純章 / 1989 / 經量部の硏究 / 春秋社

[book] 干潟龍祥 / 1954 / 本生經類の思想史的硏究 / 東洋文庫

[other] 木村泰賢 / 國譯異部宗輪論, 國譯大藏經13

[book] 寺本婉雅 / 1977 / タ-ラナ-タ印度佛敎史 / 國書刊行會

[book] 三友健用 / 2009 / アビダルマディ-パの硏究 / 平樂寺書店

[book] 小谷信千代 / 2007 / 俱舍論の原典解明-隨眠品 / 大藏出版

[book] 에띠엔 라모뜨 / 2006 / 인도불교사2 / 시공사

[book] 宇井伯壽 / 1944 / 佛敎論理學 / 大東出版社

[book] 李鍾徹 / 2001 / 世親思想の硏究 : 釋軌論を中心として / 山喜房佛書林

[book] 平等通昭 / 1968 / 梵詩邦譯佛陀の生涯 / 印度學硏究所

[book] 平川彰 / 1973 / 阿毘達磨俱舍論索引, part one/part two / 大藏出版

[book] 河村孝照 / 1974 / 阿毘達磨論書の資料的硏究 / 日本學術振興會

[book] / 1983 / 織田佛敎大辭典 / 大藏出版

[book] / 1979 / 梵和佛敎大辭典 / 講談社

[journal] 권오민 / 2008 / Sthavira Śrīlāta and Sautrāntika Vibhāsā / 보조사상 / 보조사상연구원 30 : 263~306

[journal] 권오민 / 2008 / Related Meanings and Themes in Sautrāntika and Dārstāntika ─With Particular Focus on Samghabhadra’s Nyāyānusāraśāstra / 불교학연구 / 불교학연구회 21 : 7~55

[journal] 권오민 / 2009 / Sautrāntika in the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya(1) / 한국불교학 / 한국불교학회 (53) : 251~288

[journal] 권오민 / 2009 / Sautrāntika in the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya(2) / 불교학보 / 불교문화연구원 (51) : 7~44

[journal] 권오민 / 2009 / 佛說과 非佛說 / 문학 사학 철학 (17)

[journal] 권오민 / 2010 / Sautrāntika in the Nyāyānusāra śāstra by Saṃghabhadra / 불교학보 / 불교문화연구원 (54) : 9~45

[journal] 宮本正尊 / 1936 / 譬喩者, 大德法救, 童受, 喩鬘論の硏究 / 日本佛敎協會年報 (1)

[thesis] 김성철 / 1996 / 龍樹의 中觀論理의 起源 / 박사 / 동국대학교 대학원

[book] 梶山雄一 / 1989 / 인도불교의 인식과 논리 / 민족사

[journal] 福元亮嚴 / 1961 / 成實論の部派の問題 / 佛敎學硏究 / 龍谷大學佛敎學會 (18)

[journal] 福田琢 / 1998 / 經量部の大德ラ-マ / 佛敎史學硏究 41(1)

[book] 福田琢 / 2000 / 北朝ㆍ隋ㆍ唐中國佛敎思想史 / 法藏館

[book] 福田琢 / 2000 / 加藤純章博士還曆記念論集アビダルマ佛敎とインド思想 / 春秋社

[journal] 本庄良文 / 1987 / 馬鳴詩のなかの經量部說 / 印度學佛敎學硏究 36(1)

[journal] 本庄良文 / 1992 / Sautrāntika / 印度學佛敎學硏究 40(2)

[journal] 本庄良文 / 1993 / ｢馬鳴の學派に關する先行學說の吟味｣(渡邊文麿博士追悼記念論集 / 原始佛敎と大乘佛敎 2 : 27~44

[journal] 本庄良文 / 1993 / 經を量とする馬鳴 / 印度學佛敎學硏究 42(1)

[journal] 所理惠 / 1990 / 成實論/俱舍論と譬喩者ㆍ經量部との關わりについて(2) / 密敎文化 191

[journal] 所理惠 / 1990 / 成實論と譬喩者ㆍ經量部 / 印度學佛敎學硏究 39(1)

[journal] 水野弘元 / 1930 / 譬喩者と成實論 / 駒澤大學佛敎學會年報 1

[journal] 櫻部建 / 1953 / 經量部の形態 / 印度學佛敎學硏究 2(1)

[book] 宇井伯壽 / 1978 / 國譯一切經, 論集部3

[confproc] 原田和宗 / 2003 / 經量部をめぐる諸問題 / 2003年 9月 6日印佛大會於佛敎大學發表文

[journal] 原田和宗 / 2004 / 經量部をめぐる諸問題(1) / 印度學佛敎學硏究 52(2)

[journal] 原田和宗 / 2006 / 經量部をめぐる諸問題(2) / 印度學佛敎學硏究 54(2)

[book] 平井俊榮 / 1999 / 新國譯一切經, 毘曇部6

[book] 박창환 / 2007 / The Sautāntika Theory of Seeds(bīja) / University of California

[journal] Honjō Yoshifumi / 2003 / The Word Sautrāntika / JIABS 26(2)

[journal] J. Przyluski / 1940 / Dārṣṭāntika, Sautrāntika and Sarvāstivādin / The Indian Historical Quarterly 16

[journal] Robert Kritzer / 2003 / Sautrāntika in the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya / JIABS 26(2)

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status