Korean | English

pISSN : 1225-3405 / eISSN : 2713-5470

2020 KCI Impact Factor : 0.89
Home > Explore Content > All Issues > Article List

2012, Vol., No.55

  • 1.

    Constitutional Justification of Multiple Nationality as a Matter of Constitutional Development

    Park ZinWan | 2012, (55) | pp.1~45 | number of Cited : 6
    Abstract
    How we can justify changing process of traditional understanding of nationality in constitutional theory from single nationality policy to recognition of multiple nationality through the conception of constitutional developemt being related to constitutional rescission (Verfassungswandel)?The conception of nationality being connected with interntional law and law related to organisation of the state functions functions neither as characteristic marks nor as principle of intergration. but it operates as definition of total persons under the sovereignty of states or suprem power of states. The people of the nation can be defined as the whole national being put into a state by virtue of his/her right. Greek and Roman idea of citizenship help us to understand how we got to where we are today, but are not direct predecessors of the nationality used at present in international law. An additional reason for justifying multiple nationality is found in the good of the individual. The advantage to individuals by reasons of dual and mutiple nationality is found in wide areas of life. A conflict of interest may arise not only in case of persons possessing multiple nationality holding position of influence and power, but also in relation to people who do not hold such positions. There is a discrepancy between tendency of States to ease their nationality laws and enable dual and multiple nationalities, in the reality in which states justly find it difficult to grant rights to citizens who do not live within their terrotory and impose upon them duties. Globalization make it possible for persons to openly try to obtain multiple identity. In relation to the effect of globalization on nationality, that globalization show the individual the way to contact with many other framework in additon to that of his state. Such a person may share and have strong wish to belong to these framework. In that point we can find the reason why multiple nationality in constitutional law can be justified.
  • 2.

  • 3.

    행정의 법적 정당성으로서의 ‘공공성’

    Jaegyeu Kang | 2012, (55) | pp.47~90 | number of Cited : 5
    Abstract
    근대헌법은 국민의 기본적 인권의 보장을 전제로 하고, 그것을 실현하기 위한 수단으로서의 통치기구를 구성하였으며, 입법․사법․행정으로 분립된 통치기구는 각각 국민의 기본권 보장과 실현을 효율적으로 담당하게 하기 위한 것이다. 따라서 통치기구는 항상 가변적으로 거기에 적절히 대응할 수 있도록 구성되어야 하며, 통치기구를 통한 통치활동 역시 통치기구의 설치 목적에 적절히 봉사할 수 있도록 운영되어야 한다. 이와 관련해서는 현대 헌법 역시 근대헌법과 근본적인 차이가 없으며, 현대헌법 또한 기본적 인권선언과 통치기구에 관한 규범으로 구성되어 있다. 그런데 통치활동의 한 부분인 행정은 ‘공익의 실현’을 위해 공공사무를 처리하는 것이므로, 행정활동은 항상 그러한 공공성의 관철, 즉 공익의 실현을 지향하여야 하고, 이는 일반적으로 “승인된 전제”이다. 그럼에도 불구하고 여기서 ‘행정의 공공성’을 다시 법적으로 문제 삼지 않을 수 없는 이유는, 1990년대 이후 신자유주의․신시장주의의 시대적 조류에 따라 국내외적으로 강력하게 추진되어온 행정개혁 때문이다. 최근까지 진행되어온 각국의 다양한 규제완화정책이나, 민간위탁을 포함한 행정의 민영화․시장화 정책은 당해 행정의 공공성이 상실되었거나 감소하였다는 데서 비롯된 것이 아니라, 그것은 일반적으로 재정적 이유에 근거를 두고 있다. 신자유주의의 거센 파고에 따라 본래 행정이 수행해왔던 수많은 업무들이 민영화되면서, 그러한 민영화 대상 사무가 원래 가지고 있던 ‘공공성’을 강력하게 부정하려는 여러 시도들이 있었다. 더불어 근대국가 이래 기본적이고도 불변적인 것이라 여겼던 국민국가, 지방분권, 관료제, 공무원제도, 의회제민주주의, 법치주의 등 국가․사회의 제반 시스템에 대한 재검토가 이뤄지고, 행정이 담당하여야 할 영역과 권한을 자의적으로 한정해, 공무원제도 자체의 존재이유조차 부정하는 환경이 조성되기도 했다. 그런데 근대 이래로 헌법이나 법률상의 각종 규율은, 행정이 공무를 담당하고 그러한 공무를 민주적이고 공정하며 효율적으로 실시하는데 불가피한 요소였기에 창안된 것이고, 또한 공무원의 국민 전체에 대한 봉사자성으로부터 정당한 규율들이 추가되고, 그것을 담보하기 위해 공무원의 신분보장이 이루어진 것이다. 하지만 최근의 국가사회에 덮친 신자유주의․신시장주의 광풍은 지금까지 인류사회의 유구한 역사적 경험을 통해 쌓아온 법제도의 근본까지 무너뜨릴 위기상황으로 내몰린 형국이다. 지금까지 전 방위적이고 광범위하게 추진되어온 이들 개혁정책들은 단순히 행정조직 자체 및 그 일환으로서 공무를 담당하는 공무원을 감축․정리하기 위한 ‘행정개혁’에 그치지 않았다. 예컨대 규제완화를 강조하는 자유로운 경쟁은 ‘약육강식’의 룰에 불과하지만, 이것들은 기회의 형식적 평등을 강조하여 그것이 국민 사이에 필연적으로 초래할 소득이나 자산의 격차를 공공연히 긍정했다. 다시 말하면 ‘특정인 또는 특권적 소수자’가 최소경비에 따른 최대이윤을 무정부적으로 획득할 수 있는 방식을 허용함으로써, 국민의 기본적 인권의 보장을 위해 최소한의 정당하고 합리적인 제약이나 금지조차 전면적으로 ‘무장해제’시켜버린 형국이다. 아울러 이러한 ‘행정개혁’은 헌법원리(국민주권, 국제평화, 기본적 인권존중, 지방자치 등)를 실질화하기 위한 민주적이고 공정하며 효율적인 행정의 실현을 도모하기 위해 추진된 것이 아니라, 오히려 헌법원리를 공동화함으로써, ‘특정인 또는 특권적 소수자’를 제외한 압도적 다수의 국민에게 적대적인 국가구조개혁의 양상을 노정해왔다. 아무리 시대상황이 변하였다 할지라도 인류가 유구한 역사적 경험을 통해 지금까지 축적해온 각종 제도들의 창설목적, 존재이유 및 그 본질적 성격이 변한 것은 아니다. 근대건 현대건 행정이란 그 목적이나 담당 사무의 범위에서 시대상황에 따라 다소간의 차이는 있다 할지라도, 근본적으로 변화되지는 않았다. 즉 현대행정이란 헌법적 존재근거를 기반으로, ‘국민의 기본적 인권의 보장과 실현’을 위해 적극적이고 새롭게 창출된 통치기구의 한 부문으로서, 19세기 자유주의 시대의 행정과는 달리, 통치기구의 또 다른 영역인 사법이나 입법과 더불어, 준사법적․준입법적인 권한을 통해 자신에게 부여된 시대적 소명을 다하여야 할 책무를 지고 있다. 새롭게 출현한 21세기 행정의 법적 존재이유는 사법․입법과 더불어 ‘협동’하여 국민의 기본적 인권을 보장하고 실현하는데 있는 것이다. 즉 오늘날의 행정은 ‘보이지 않는 손(invisible hand)’에 의해 자율적으로 규율된다던 시장이 실패함으로써 국민의 기본적 인권의 침해상태에 대해, 통치활동으로서 법적 존재이유가 동일한 사법이나 입법이 그 역할을 완수할 수 없었던 영역에서 적절히 대응할 수 있도록 출현된 것이 바로 제3의 권력부분으로서의 행정이다. 다시 말해 행정이란 준사법적․준입법적인 권한을 본질로 하는 ‘공권력’뿐만 아니라, 재화나 서비스의 공급과 같은 ‘비권력적’인 수단까지 활용하여 종합적이고 예방에 역점을 두는 독자적 권력부문으로서 확립된 것이기에, 행정이 담당하여야 할 공무란 현대의 기본적 인권의 보장과 실현이 요구하는 본질적으로 예방적 기능을 갖는 다양하고 적극적인 활동이어야 하는 것이다. 따라서 지금까지 효율성을 앞세워 진행된 각종 행정영역의 민영화 정책은 재고되어야 한다.
  • 4.

    The Limits of Government Intervention in the Disputes of Private College Running - Focused on the Ways for Normalization of the School Foundation Corporation Run by the Board of Interim Directors -

    Jong Geun Lee | 2012, (55) | pp.91~133 | number of Cited : 3
    Abstract PDF
    The purpose of this writing is to cast light on the legal rights of trustees and founders of incorporated educational private institutions involved in complications in the normalization process of those troubled institutions. Article 31 (4) of the Korean Constitution provides that independence, professionalism, and political impartiality of education and the autonomy of institutions of higher learning shall be guaranteed under the conditions as prescribed by act. Concerning infringement of the autonomy of institutions of higher education, one of the most important problem is the abuse of education administration. Discussing the autonomy of private institution of higher learning, we must keep two points of view in mind. One is a standpoint of applying to campus disputes of private institutions the principle of private autonomy of which center the freedom of contract is. The other is a perspective that how we should understand the establishment of private institutions, which provides the key to the solution of campus strives. Campus troubles are symptoms that arise when the separation of powers is applied in the university. Separation of powers within the university is important not merely because it allows the university to achieve its goals and to be consistent with its mission. Rather, in a sense, separation of powers is the mission of the university, providing time and space for the free inquiry of new ideas. Many modern universities have extraordinarily complicated and muddled systems of internal governance. However a system of internal governance based upon a separation of powers avoids ad hoc administration and the frequent legalistic wrangling that accompanies it. In Korea, the measures prescribed in the article 20-2(revocation of approval of officer's taking office) and article 25(appointment of temporary director) of private school act are mostly used for government intervention. If those measures are combined with a mean stipulated in the article 25-3 of private school act(normalization of school juristic person for which temporary directors are selected and appointed), it may be possible for the nation to socialize the private institutions, which is unconstitutional. The result of Dartmouth College signaled the beginning of the contemporary regime of charitable regulation in American law. Despite the academic infighting, the substantive importance of the case was the constitutionality of state legislative amendments to corporate charters. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the New Hampshire legislative amendments are unconstitutional in violation of the Contract Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The result of Dartmouth College signaled the beginning of the contemporary regime of charitable regulation in American law. The Dartmouth Court has great implications for us.
  • 5.

    Le changement de relation entre le procureur et l'officier de police judiciaire à la suite de révision du Code de procédure pénale

    KIM TAEK SU | 2012, (55) | pp.135~167 | number of Cited : 7
    Abstract PDF
    La révision de l'article 196 du Code de procédure pénale et l'abolition de l'article 53 de la loi de parquet, ayant pour but de la codification de pouvoir de commencement de l'investigation en faveur de la police et de l'aménagement de la relation entre le parquet et la police, contribue à la confirmation de l'autonomie d'enquê̂te policière et à enlèvement du rapport autorité-obéissance. Pourtant, il s'agit d'une ignorance de l'institution de l'officier de police judiciare de s'approcher au point de vue d'un problème sur la relation seulement entre le parquet et la police à la place d'un problème entre les procureurs et tous les officiers de police judiciare. Il n'en résulte qu'il n'est pas sûr que la relation de directon rédigée par l'article 196 en vigeur soit applicable aux autres catégories de l'officier de police judiciiare. Cette affirmation se fond sur l'abolition de l'article 53 qui s'appliquait à tous les catégories de l'officier de police judiciare. Pour les officiers de police judiciaire qui relevent de la police nationale, la direction de procureur ne se justifie que dans le cadre de non empê̂chement aux acitivités de l'investigation policière en vertu de l'article 196 alinéa 2. La direction de la procureur est impossible pour les enquê̂tes officieuses qui ne sont pas considérées comme les enquê̂tes ordinaires. Le décret pésidentiel permet seulement le contrô̂le postérieur aux procureurs à la fin de l'enquê̂te officieuse qui pourrait ê̂tre considéré comme les enquê̂tes ordinaire selon le critère concret sur la notion d'enqû̂ete. De sorte qu'il est nécessaire d'introdiure le fondement légal sur la relation de direction pour les autres catégories de l'officier de police judiciaire et d'établir les dispositions concernants les enquê̂tes officieuses.
  • 6.

    Concurrent exercise of the right to revoke fraudulent act and monetary compensation

    Lee Hye Jin | 2012, (55) | pp.169~199 | number of Cited : 6
    Abstract
    The Civil Code § 406 prescribes ‘Creditor's Right of Revocation’. This provision is probably the only one that treats such a theme in the Civil Code. Such a simplicity may cause inconsistency and confusion in exercising a creditor's right to revoke through a suit. Many case laws might have given solutions to the inconsistency and confusion in exercising the Creditor's Right of Revocation, but logical contradictions have been revealed in interpreting some cases. As an attempt to get a solution to such a contradiction, this paper explores some issues concerning the Creditor's Right of Revocation including ‘concurrent suits revoking fraudulent act and problems in ordering monetary compensation’ and ‘some issues in the distribution procedure’, etc. After inquiring such ones, this paper points out that some supreme court's opinions should be changed.
  • 7.

    Trust as a device for property management and succession in aging society

    Kim, Pan Gi | 2012, (55) | pp.201~225 | number of Cited : 15
    Abstract
    The aging phenomenon in Korea than other countries is serious. And in various fields efforts to prepare for the coming aging society are progressing steadily. When we become the aging society, no longer a moral or ethical concept of filial piety alone will be difficult for solving problems of the aged. Thus, we will be necessary to prepare to live without the help of a child. In addition, anyone who lives in society to be established private ownership want to determine the relationship. This need by being prepared with the traditional doctrine of succession has been developed. However, we will be able to decide freely the management and succession of property by the trust. In addition to conventional methods about the management and succession of this property. In our country, there are not active discussions about trust as a means of the management and succession of the property. Because we established and were operating focused on commercial trust. But trust will be make use of various purposes because of various features of trust. In an aging society, especially trust is more useful than civil law in the aspect to manage and succeed to own property.
  • 8.

    Die Forschung über die professionelle Verantwortung des Rechtsanwalts

    YOON,SEOK-CHAN | 2012, (55) | pp.227~252 | number of Cited : 7
    Abstract
    Privatrechtliche Grundlage für das Verhältnis zwischen Mandant und Anwalt ist der zwischen beiden geschlossene Anwaltsvertrag. Jedoch ist der Anwaltvertrag nicht als besonderer Vertragstyp gesetzlich normiert. Der Anwaltsvertrag ist im Regelfall ein Dienstvertrag, der eine Geschäftsbesorgung zum Gegenstand hat. Der Anwalt schuldet also gewöhnlich keinen Erfolg, sondern lediglich seine Dienste. Dennoch sind auch Konstellationen denkbar, in denen das Rechtsverhältnis zwischen Mandant und Anwalt als Werkvertrag mit Geschäftsbesorgungscharakter zu qualifizieren ist. Dies ist dann der Fall, wenn der Rechtsanwalt lediglich einen bestimmten erfolg, wie zB die Erstellung eines Rechtsgutachtens oder einen vertragswurfs schuldet. Aus dem Anwaltsvertrag ergeben sich bestimmte Rechte und Pflichten für die Parteien, welche sich konkret aus gesetzlichen Regelungen ergeben, aber teileweise auch durch die Rechtsprechung entwickelt wurden. Die konkreten Pflichten des Anwalts gegenüber seinem Mandaten ergeben sich dabei zunächst aus der privatautonomen ausdrücklichen Vereinbarung zwischen den Parteien. Jedoch ergeben sich für den Anwalt auch ohne ausdrückliche Vereinbarungen bestimmte Pflichten. Die Pflichten des Rechtsanwalts erlangen vor dem haftungsrechtlichen Hintergrund Bedeutung. Verletzt der Rechtsanwalt schuldhaft eine der Prlichten, so haftet er auf Grund positiver Vertragsverletzung. Haftungsgrundlage für einen Schadensersatzanspruch des Mandanten gegen den Anwalt ist sowie eben regelmäßig das zwischen diesen Beteiligten begründete Vertragsverhältnis. Beim echten Vertrag zugunsten Dritter erwirbt der Dritte den Anspruch unmittelbar gegen den Versprechenden, ohne dass eigenes Handeln von ihm oder auch nur die Kenntnis vom Erwerb erforderlich sind. Es muss vertraglich vereinbart werden in Deutschland, dass dem Dritten das Recht zustehen soll. Möglich ist auch die Vereinbarung, dass dem Gläubiger das Recht vorbehalten bleibt, den Dritten zu bestimmen oder die getroffene Bestimmung zu ändern. Jedoch hat die Relevanz von Verträgen mit Schutzwirkung zugunsten Dritter deutlich zugenommen. Da der Vertrag mit Schutzwirkung zugunsten Dritter zu einem eigenen Ersatzanspruch des Dritten gegen den Schuldner führt, liquidiert also der Dritte seien eigenen Schaden.
  • 9.

    일본의 원자력손해배상제도 - 후쿠시마(福島) 원자력사고를 중심으로 -

    조일윤 | 2012, (55) | pp.253~288 | number of Cited : 7
    Abstract
    2011년 3월 11일 일본의 동북지방에서 발생한 대지진에 의해 후쿠시마 제1원자력발전소 원자로건물의 폭발, 그로 인하여 방사능물질이 유출되는 사고가 발생하였다. 그 영향으로 아직도 많은 피난자는 원래의 주거지로 돌아올 수 없을 정도로 사고가 수습되지 않는 상황이 계속되고 있다. 이러한 손해는 미증유의 규모로, 앞으로 많은 분쟁과 소송이 예상된다. 이러한 분쟁이나 소송을 대비하여 일본은 ‘원자력손해의 배상에 관한 법률’을 제정하였으나, 그것만으로는 불충분하여 사고 이후에 ‘원자력손해배상지원기구법’과 ‘평성23년(2011년) 원자력사고에 의한 피해에 관한 긴급조치에 관한 법률’을 제정하여 피해자구제에 결함이 없게 하고 있다. 원자력사고에 대하여 일본은 이들 법률에 따라 무과실책임, 책임의 집중의 원칙 등을 취하고 있으며, 그 책임주체는 전력회사이고, 그것을 보완하는 역할을 국가가 담당하고 있다고 할 수 있다. 특히 ‘원자력손해의 배상에 관한 법률’ 제18조 제2항 제2호에 기초하여 ‘원자력손해배상분쟁심사회’가 “원자력손해의 범위의 판정의 지침 그 밖의 당해 분쟁의 당사자에 의한 자주적인 해결에 이바지하는 일반적인 지침”을 조기에 책정하였다. 이 지침에서는 원자력손해에 해당하는 개연성이 높은 것부터 순차적으로 기준을 제시하여 가능한 한 조기에 피해자구제를 도모하고 있다.
  • 10.

    A Study on the Auditor’s Liability related to the Lawsuit of Savings Bank’s Subordinated bond investors

    Cho, Sang-Kyu | 2012, (55) | pp.289~324 | number of Cited : 5
    Abstract
    In Savings Bank Affairs, most of the illegal loan or window dressing caused by major shareholder or executive was taken place by using other’s name illegally. These are representative examples that increased loan for interest payment and adding up financial consultancy fees. To cut to the point, they are cases which cannot presume a violation of cautious obligation to the Auditor because all of them used borrowed-name bank account. If an employee of bank windows had violated explanation obligation and had not presented product manual, a report of audit attached to a stock card would have little meaning of existence in one’s investment process. So in terms of investor, it can be assumed that there is no trade causality. Because an investor did not acknowledge the existence of stock card and did not examine it. In case of demage claim suit against Auditor under ‘Financial Investment Service and Capital Markets Act’, the auditor takes a burden of onus probandi. In order to be subjected to ‘Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act’ and an exemption clause of ‘Act on External Audit of Stock Companies’, the auditor has to prove the fact that “Despite considerable cautions, the Auditor was not able to know and did not neglect the obligation.” So the auditor’s status is disadvantageous and furthermore as to estimate liability ratio In korea, where the proportionate liability has not been introduced yet, the mistake set-off method which considers plaintiff’s mistake based on principle of equity is used to judge the auditor’s liability appropriately under the joint responsibility. In the future, the savings bank supervision system should be reformed. Preparing the supervision direction that the savings bank can play an original role as a small-loan finance and preventing major shareholder and executive from abusing their authority through tightening regulations on soundness of management structure and refraining excessive enlargement are needed. To protect the subordinated bond holder and depositor, the system should be reorganized by providing an institutional strategy such as enhancing the explanation obligation and restriction on an advertisement.
  • 11.

    Urheberrechtsfragen des Cloud Computing

    최상필 | 2012, (55) | pp.325~342 | number of Cited : 6
    Abstract
    Cloud Computing” ist derzeit das wahrscheinlich meistverwendete „Buzzword” der Informations- und Kommunikationsbranche. Der Begriff bezeichnet nicht eine bestimmte Art von Diensten, sondern die Form ihrer Bereitstellung: Verschiedenste IT-Dienste und -Anwendungen werden dezentral über das Internet – „aus der Wolke” – verfügbar gemacht. Eine der praxisrelevantesten Nutzungsarten des Cloud Computings stellt die Auslagerung von Daten in eine „Public Cloud” dar, wie sie etwa von Amazon oder Google angeboten wird. Dabei handelt es sich häufig um Kunden- oder Lieferantendaten, aber auch um schützenswerte Angaben über eigene Mitarbeiter, etwa i.R.d. Gehaltsabrechnung, der Zeiterfassung oder der E-Mail-Archivierung. Es muss berücksichtigt werden, dass die unterschiedlichen Erscheinungsformen des Cloud Computing unterschiedliche urheberrechtliche Folgen nach sich ziehen: Während im Rahmen des PaaS und SaaS in der Regel Software zur Verfügung gestellt wird, ist dies im Rahmen des IaaS grundsätzlich nicht der Fall. In diesem Beitrag wurde aufgezeigt, dass auf Grundlage einer sorgfältigen juristischen Analyse und Prüfung Probleme bei der Nutzung des Cloud Computing vermieden und Lösungen gefunden werden können.
  • 12.

    The protection of the right of publicity

    Moon IL-Hwan | 2012, (55) | pp.343~371 | number of Cited : 7
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the right of publicity, which has been to be conceptualized to legally deal with the phenomena mass media have brought about. In the United States, where the entertainment businesses have been developed for a long time, the discussion regarding the right of publicity has flourished. The Republic of Korea also begins to recognize the importance of this right as the entertainment businesses such as sports and the entertainment management recently begins to emerge as a big market. However, there has never existed the legislation nor the holdings of the Supreme Court regarding the issue. To protect the right owner and to prevent any free-rider, the legislation regarding the issue is urgently needed. This paper first addresses the nature of the right of publicity, and then proceeds to see whether the existing statutes including the copyright law can protect the right of publicity. Lastly, this paper focuses on the real cases where the right of publicity is infringed. The names and the pictures of the celebrities became influential by the efforts of the individual celebrities in one way. However, the coincidence and the trend of the society also contribute to the influence regardless of the efforts of the celebrities. The names and the pictures of the celebrities are also sort of the public goods. Therefore, regarding the future legislation, the restriction on the right of publicity to some extent should be necessary.
  • 13.

    Study on Enforcement Levy and Back-Pay Order of NLRC

    Eunjeong Park | 2012, (55) | pp.373~399 | number of Cited : 4
    Abstract
    This paper reviews several subjects on the enforcement levy system and the back-pay order of NLRC for unfair dismissals. Especially focusing on the recent case, it develops some theories about the character of enforcement levy, the imposition of enforcement levy, the revocation suit for the imposition of enforcement levy, the grounds of back-pay order of NLRC and the independence of back-pay order of NLRC. After deliberation, this paper develops the conclusion that the confliction between the enforcement levy system and the back-pay order of NLRC for unfair dismissals is resulted not from the enforcement levy system but from the incompletion of back-pay order of NLRC for unfair dismissals. NLRC is very important system for labor dispute resolution. For the advancement of NLRC's adjudication function, it should overcome various problems by resolving the confliction between the enforcement levy system and the back-pay order of NLRC for unfair dismissals.
  • 14.

    Strafrecht als Botanik/ Die Anspruchlosigkeit des awissenschaftlichen Strafrechts

    Son, Mi-Suk | 2012, (55) | pp.401~422 | number of Cited : 3
    Abstract
    이 글은 토론토 대학교 마쿠스 두버교수가 독일 형법과 미국 형법의 특색에 관하여 쓴 글인 “식물학으로서의 형법학”(Strafrecht als Botanik, in: Empirische und dogmatische Fundamente, kriminalpolitischer Impetus. Symposium für Bernd Schünemann zum 60. Geburtstag. Herausgegeben von Roland Hefendehl, Köln, Berlin, München 2005, 245—256면)과 “학문성을 원치 않는 형법의 단순성”(Die Anspruchlosigkeit des awissenschaftlichen Strafrechts, ZStW 121 (2009), 977—984면)이라는 두 논문의 번역이다. 우리나라 독자들의 이해를 돕기 위해 두 논문을 “미국 형법교수가 본 독일 형법과 미국 형법의 특징”이라는 제목 하에 하나로 묶었다: 제1장은 독일 형법의 특징에 관한 것이며, 제2장은 미국 형법의 특징에 관한 것이다; 제2장은 또 두버교수가 2009년 5월 독일 형법교수들 학회(Strafrechtslehrertagung)에서 미국 형법학과 미국 형사사법의 관계에 대해 발표한 내용이기도 하다. 이 번역을 통해 우리나라 독자들이 독일 형법과 미국 형법에 대한 인상을 동시에 가질 수 있는 기회가 되기를 바란다.
  • 15.

    동아법학 55호 부록

    법학연구소 | 2012, (55) | pp.423~455 | number of Cited : 0