A Study on the provisional remedies in the Constitutional Court

Hyun Jai Kim

doi:10.31839/DALR.2020.11.89.1

The petitioner needs an injunction to secure the effectiveness of the original trial and to save the rights in a provisional manner, but the Constitutional Court is silent on other unconstitutional legal trials, impeachment trials, and Constitutional Court rulings over the explicit provisions of provisional disposition only in the judgment of dissolution of political parties and power disputes. However, the injunction is also allowed in other judging procedures. Decision orders vary in order to achieve the purpose of provisional disposition. It is possible to have an injunction to suspend the validity of a problematic disposition, an injunction to seek the suspension of execution or procedures, and an active injunction to determine the temporary status, such as ordering the disposition of non-action or rejection. An independent injunction can be filed before the trial continues, and the Constitutional Court can reject or dismiss the request, but cannot make a quotation decision. In addition, an injunction by the Constitutional Court's authority is useful in the condition that the original bill continues. An immediate appeal against the injunction is not allowed under the single-judge Constitutional Court, but the petitioner's objection to the injunction is allowed in terms of guaranteeing the parties' participation in the process and the cancellation of the injunction is also possible if there is a change in the circumstances, such as the termination of the grounds for the injunction.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (2)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (23)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2022년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[book] 김하열 / 2018 / 헌법강의 / 박영사

[book] 전광석 / 2020 / 한국헌법론 (제15판) / 집현재

[book] 정종섭 / 2014 / 헌법소송법 / 박영사

[book] 허 영 / 2020 / 헌법소송법론 / 박영사

[book] 허완중 / 2019 / 헌법소송법 / 박영사

[book] 허전 / 2012 / 헌법소송 / 진원사

[other] 헌법재판소 / 2015 / 헌법재판실무제요

[other] 헌법재판연구 / 2016 / 국가별 법령집

[book] 한수웅 / 2015 / 주석헌법재판소법 / 헌법재판연구원

[journal] 김상겸 / 2008 / A Comparative Study on the Preliminary Injunction of Constitutional Complaints with special reference to Korea and Germany / 한독사회과학논총 / 한독사회과학회 18(1) : 359~384

[journal] 김상겸 / 2005 / The Problem of Constitutional Court Act and its Improving / 공법학연구 / 한국비교공법학회 6(1) : 125~150

[journal] 김하열 / 2013 / A Study on Provisional Remedy in Constitutional Litigation / 법학논집 / 법학연구소 18(2) : 29~59

[journal] 김현철 / 2019 / A Study on the Distinctiveness of the Adjudicative Procedure of Constitutional Complaint of CCA, Art. 68(1) / 국가법연구 / 사단법인 한국국가법학회 15(3) : 87~123

[book] 박상훈 / 2001 / 헌법재판제도의 이해 / 법원도서관

[journal] 박종보 / 2007 / 헌법재판과 가처분 제도 / 세계헌법연구 / 세계헌법학회한국학회 13(1)

[journal] 박진우 / 2017 / A study on the legislative improvement plan of the Constitutional Court Act / 가천법학 / 법학연구소 10(4) : 23~50 / http://dx.doi.org/10.15335/GLR.2017.10.4.002

[journal] 손인혁 / 2020 / A Study on the acceptability and requirement of the Provisional Remedy in Constitutional Litigation / 연세법학 / 연세법학회 (35) : 81~108 / http://dx.doi.org/10.33606/YLA.35.4

[journal] 이준상 / 2010 / Interim Remedies in Constitutional Trials - in relation to reviewing the recently proposed draft legislations - / 사법 / 사법발전재단 1(13) : 137~181 / 10.22825/juris.2010.1.13.004

[journal] 조수혜 / 2012 / The Constitutional Court's Attitude Toward Provisional Remedies: A Comparative Study between Korea and the U.S. / 미국헌법연구 / 미국헌법학회 23(3) : 307~342

[journal] 황치연 / 2002 / 헌법재판에서의 가처분 / 헌법판례연구 / 한국헌법판례연구학회 4

[other] 강현중 / 2000 / 헌법소원심판에 가처분이 허용되는가-헌법재판소 2000. 12. 8. 2000헌사471 전원재판부 결정에 대한 검토 / 법률신문 제2975호, 2001. 3. 24.자

[other] 박종보 / 2002 / 법령의 효력정지를 명하는 가처분 / 법률 신문 판례평석, 2002. 6. 6.자

[other] 제4차 법제사법위원회 / 2019 / 헌법재판소법 일부개정법률안 검토보고 / 국회법제사법위원회

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status