A Study on the Implications of Prefix “Trans-”: Focusing on Conceptual Consideration for Trans-Humanities

Yunkyung Cho

doi:10.22901/trans.2010.3.3.5

The purpose of the study is to discuss the implications of the prefix “trans” for our current culture when the word is associated with different concepts, as a way of identifying a variety of problems and possibilities that occur at the boundary (or transcending the boundary) that do not or cannot belong anywhere else. The prefix “trans” refers to the process of crossing, transcending, or passing through a boundary. As a prefix of a verb, it means the act of transferring, transcending, trespassing, and transgressing. But the factors that make up such acts are not always physical, and the boundaries do not necessarily refer to the borders between nations. The prefix “trans-,” which cannot be used alone, presents a new paradigm for the domains of glocalization, medium, gender, human nature, and academics by being added to words like “transculturality,” “transmediality,” “transidentity,” and “transdicipline.” The prefix “inter-,” often compared with “trans-” in the current cultural paradigm, has the connotation of a mutual relationship and two-way communication between two equal entities, and another prefix, “multi-,” implies multi-centered, enumeration, co-existence, and relativism (not involved in or intervening in others’ affairs). By contrast, the assumption that lies behind “trans-” is a holistic, meta-community, such as is expressed in the concepts of cyber network and global village, where mutual involvement, intervention, infiltration and influence lead to the changes in individual entities and in the identity of the community. This identity is not a single identity, but a “hyphenated identity.” In other words, it is a double identity that refers to ethnic and cultural identity. The hyphenated identity also rejects the premise that there are two realms that are separated by a border. Now, the dynamics of networks open to sub-entities are shifting from the dichotomous paradigm that guided thinking on the relationship between center and periphery. The process of crossing, transcending, and changing that lies behind “trans-” implies a process of initiation. The space for “trans” does not mean a “house” but a “road.” It does not point to a private space to stay and settle, but to a social space characterized by mobility, interaction, and change. The culture, ego, academics, and media of our time, a time dominated by a discourse of “trans” that symbolizes the process of initiation, force one to risk losing one’s self in order to find one’s self. It is a venture involving a process of introspection that takes place at academic boundaries and at territorial borders. The transcendence in the discourse on “trans-” refers not to metaphysical transcendence, but to a change from one attitude to another. Only for this reason can “trans-” serve as another perspective allowing us to gain insight into our time and culture.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (30)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (21)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[book] 니콜 라피에르 / 2007 / 다른 곳을 사유하자 / 푸른숲

[book] 도정일 / 2005 / 대담 / 휴머니스트

[book] 마샬 맥루한 / 2005 / 미디어의 이해 / 커뮤니케이션북스

[journal] 민가영 / 2009 / Research on Subject of Low Class Women Who Have Experienced Repeated Migration through the Concept of 'trans' / 한국여성학 / 한국여성학회 25(4) : 5~39

[book] 박영숙 / 2006 / 트랜스휴먼과 미래경제 / 교보문고

[other] / 2008 / 엡슈타인 인터뷰. 테크네의 귀환 / 교수신문

[journal] 이봉희 / 2007 / A Study on Transmedia / 기초조형학연구 / 한국기초조형학회 8(4) : 487~497

[book] 질 들뢰즈 / 2001 / 천 개의 고원 / 새물결

[journal] 최용호 / 2009 / Trans-Semiosis and Reading - focusing on Don Quixote / 한국문학이론과 비평 / 한국문학이론과비평학회 13(3) : 83~106

[book] 한혜원 / 2006 / 트랜스미디어 스토리텔링 / 디지털컨텐츠

[book] 호미바바 / 2002 / 문화의 위치 / 소명출판

[book] Cazenave, M / 1994 / L'Homme, la science et la nature, Regards transdisciplinaire / Le Mail

[book] Déotte, Jean-Louis / 2007 / Appareil et intermédialité / L'Harmattan

[book] Derrida, Jacques. / 2005 / Qu'est-ce qu'une traduction"relevante"? / L'Herne

[journal] Ferrari, Rossella / 2008 / Transnation/transmedia/transtext : border-crossing from screen to stage in Greater China / Journal of Chinese Cinemas 2(1) : 53~65

[book] Hébert, Louis / 2009 / Intertextualité, interdiscursivité et intermédialité / Les Presses de l'Université Laval

[book] Jaigu, Y. (préf. ). / 1987 / La Déclaration de Venise / Félin

[book] Lyotard, Jean-François / 1979 / La condition postmoderne : rapport sur le savoir(포스트모던의 조건) / Minuit

[journal] Rajewsky, Irina / 2005 / Intermediality, intertextuality and remediation : a literacy perspective on intermediality / Intermédialités 6 : 43~64

[book] Toro, Alfonso de. / 2009 / Epistémologies 'Le Maghreb' / L'Harmattan

[journal] Wolf, Werner / 2004 / Cross the Border-Close that Gap: Towards an Intermedial Narratology / European Journal of English Studies 8(1) : 81~103

이 논문은 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 작성되었습니다.

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status