Proposal Concerning to the Development of Teaching “Confucian Classics” in Classical Chinese Textbooks in Middle and High Schools

Kim Yong-Jae

doi:10.18213/jkccl.2013.27.1.009

After the acceptance of ‘classical Chinese(漢文)’ as a distinguishing subject in 1972, the curriculum was formed and based on it the textbooks, which guarantee the teaching contents, were produced several times. However despite the quantitative increase, it is still necessary to think more about the qualitative development of the so-called ‘material for writing’ - the texts written by Chinese characters in textbooks. Especially the contents of ‘classical Chinese’ textbooks, going after several revisions of curriculum, have repeatedly transfigured in some aspects, but the whole contents in reality almost remain the same. About the part of ‘Confucian classics’, it can be seen that there is only the quantitative expansion, while the classical texts almost imitate the pre-existing ones as the standard and remain unchanged. This point must be thought about carefully. However the part the most necessary to be considered is the fact that the purpose, the contents and the evaluation etc. of the ‘Confucian classics education’ are not yet concretely clarified. Sometimes there are discussions on this field, but the contents seem to be much sketchy. The purpose this paper aims at is that, in order to solve all the problems of the ‘Confucian classics education’, we must try to generally arrange and examine parts of Confucian classics which are included in textbooks currently published, and from that find the questions and the goals of this education. About the question of the first step in practising ‘classical Chinese’, it is commonly thought of “The Analects” and “Mencius”. If the Confucian classics is considered the first step in practising ‘Classical Chinese’, then in order that the classical Chinese subject would not be evaded, and to fulfil the responsibility and the identity of this subject, we must find a new way for the Confucian classics to appear in textbooks, and their educational direction.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (6)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (23)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[book] 김상홍 / 중학교 한문1,2,3 교과서 / 지학사

[book] 김용재 / 중학교 한문1,2,3 교과서 / 더 텍스트

[book] 송재소 / 중학교 한문1,2,3 교과서 / 다락원

[book] 심경호 / 중학교 한문1,2,3 교과서 / 대교

[book] 이동재 / 중학교 한문1,2,3 교과서 / 비상교육

[book] 이명학 / 중학교 한문1,2,3 교과서 / 금성출판사

[book] 이상진 / 중학교 한문1,2,3 교과서 / 동화사

[book] 장윤혁 / 중학교 한문1,2,3 교과서 / 민중서림

[book] 김언종 / 2012 / 고등학교 한문Ⅰ 교과서 / 교학사

[book] 김용재 / 2012 / 고등학교 한문Ⅰ 교과서 / 더텍스트

[book] 박성규 / 2012 / 고등학교 한문Ⅰ 교과서 / 두산동아

[book] 송재소 / 2012 / 고등학교 한문Ⅰ 교과서 / 다락원

[book] 신표섭 / 2012 / 고등학교 한문Ⅰ 교과서 / 대학서림

[other] 교육과학기술부 / 제7차 고등학교 교육과정 해설(13), 한문1

[journal] 김용재 / 2009 / Analytical understanding of the Confucian scripture, 『the Analects of Confucius』, through old annotations of 『the Analects of Confucius』 / 동양철학연구 / 동양철학연구회 (59) : 7~58

[journal] 김용재 / 2012 / Understanding on the text of the Analects through comparative study of Collected Explanations of the Analects and Collected Annotations on the Analects[5] / 漢文古典硏究 / 한국한문고전학회 24(1) : 303~343 / http://dx.doi.org/

[journal] 김용재 / 2013 / 韓國儒敎經典定本化事業의 意義 / 유학연구 / 유학연구소 28 : 221~246

[journal] 원용석 / 2004 / 고등학교 한문교과서의 내용 및 수준의 문제 고찰 / 한자한문교육연구 / 한국한자한문교육학회 13

[journal] 이돈석 / 2011 / Review on the contents of Education for The Four Books in Classical Chinese Textbook of High School / 漢文古典硏究 / 한국한문고전학회 23(1) : 287~312

[journal] 이돈석 / 2013 / 한문교과서의 경서 교육에 대한 일고 / 漢字漢文硏究 / 한국한자한문교육학회 30

[journal] 이동재 / 2007 / Development of Middle School Shino Korean Textbooks based on New Curriculum / 漢字漢文敎育 / 한국한자한문교육학회 1(19) : 143~170

[confproc] 이수정 / 2013 / 2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 중학교 한문 교과서 분석 / 2013년도 교육문제연구소 정기학술발표회 발표(자료)집

[journal] 장호성 / 2004 / The problem of teaching material in department of classical Chinese - Centering around high school classical Chinese textbooks of The 7th Curriculum / 漢文敎育硏究 / 한국한문교육학회 22(1) : 151~190

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status