Analysis of Sustainability of Hospital Based on Average Achieved Rate in LEED-HC Credits

Jeeeun Kang

doi:10.15682/jkiha.2020.26.1.29

KJC Korea
Journal Central

JOURNAL OF THE KOREA INSTITUTE OF HEALTHCARE ARCHITECTURE 2022 KCI Impact Factor : 0.3

Korean | English

pISSN : 2733-8649 / eISSN : 2733-8657

http://journal.kci.go.kr/ikiha

BACK
TOP

Home > Explore Content > All Issues > Article View

3 of 7

Analysis of Sustainability of Hospital Based on Average Achieved Rate in LEED-HC Credits

JOURNAL OF THE KOREA INSTITUTE OF HEALTHCARE ARCHITECTURE
Abbr : KIHA
2020, 26(1), pp.29-37
DOI : 10.15682/jkiha.2020.26.1.29

Publisher : Korea Institute Of Healthcare Architecture
Research Area : Architectural Engineering

Received : January 16, 2020
Accepted : February 26, 2020
Published : March 15, 2020

Jeeeun Kang ¹

¹호서대학교

ABSTRACT
열림/닫힘 버튼

Purpose: The purpose of the research is to find difficulty levels of LEED credits in each LEED level based on credits achievement in order to find important of LEED-HC credits to gain LEED-HC. Methods: The individual credits of LEED-HC v.2009 scorecards from USGBC website are analyzed. With achieved scores rate of LEED credits per each Level, all credits are reassembled in 4 different ranges (A~D); easy (A), easy-moderate (B), moderate-hard (C) and hard (D) to achieve scores. Results: 1) Achieved point rate in LEED-HC specific credits are low. These credits need to be reviewed carefully. 2) In 88 projects, 37 projects are gained Silver level which is more than projects in certification level. In order to encourage to gain LEED-HC level, Average Achieved rate to earn Certificate level needs to be risen. 3) Credits in range D rarely affect to gain platinum level. EAc1 (24 points) are critical to gain Silver and Gold level. However, EAc1 points are not effective to achieve Certificate level. Implications: This research will provide a fundamental back data to set up Korean Green building rating system for Healthcare.
KEYWORDS
열림/닫힘 버튼

LEED, LEED HC, Hospital, Sustainable, Energy and Atmosphere. Optimized Energy Performance, G-SEED

Statistics

224 Viewed

8 Downloaded

Tools

Print this page

Download PDF

Export Citation

Sharing

Facebook

Twitter

Issue List

Vol.29 No.3

Vol.29 No.2

Vol.29 No.1

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (1)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (9)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2022년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[web] / G-SEED / https://www.gbc.re.kr

[journal] 김가희 / 2015 / A Study on the Comparative Analysis of Score and Application in Each Building Type for LEED Certified Buildings / 한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집 / 한국건축친환경설비학회 9(3) : 222~228

[journal] 강지은 / 2019 / The Analysis of Achieved Score earned by LEED Healthcare / 의료·복지 건축 / 한국의료복지건축학회 25(3) : 7~14 / https://doi.org/10.15682/jkiha.2019.25.3.7

[journal] 이호성 / 2009 / A Comparative Study of a Domestic and Foreign Green Architecture Evaluation Items for a Green Performance Enhancement of Hospital Architecture / 한국실내디자인학회 논문집 / 한국실내디자인학회 18(1) : 99~107

[journal] 임영환 / 2010 / A Study on Green Building Certification Criteria for Healthcare Facilities - A Comparative Study of GBCC, LEED and BREEAM - / 대한건축학회논문집 / 대한건축학회 26(08) : 153~162

[journal] Maryam Golbazia / 2016 / Analysis of Credits Earned by LEED Healthcare Certified Facilities / Procedia Enineering 145 : 203~210

[web] / U.S Green Building Council / www.usgbc.org

[journal] 왕정준 / 2014 / The comparison of hospital certification between G-SEED and foreign certification criteria / KIEAE Journal / 한국생태환경건축학회 14(4) : 81~89 / http://dx.doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2014.14.4.081

[web] / USGBC / https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-2009-healthcare-vsleed-2009-new-construction-credit-comparison