The Three-Stage Model on the Peace Korean Peninsula in the perspective of Active Peace Strategy

Seong-Ryoul Cho

doi:10.18013/jnar.2015.30.1.002

Recently North Korea continues to assert its position as a nuclear power and escalates military tensions on the Korean peninsula. As the Korean security situations are worsening, it is necessary for the two Koreas to pursue an arms control agreement with each other and to institutionalize a settlement of peace. For the peace of the Korean peninsula, we should be worthy of notice the 3-stage strategic model including passive peace, active peace and perpetual peace. The perspective of active peace is a strategy to solve a current Korean Questions. Active peace strategy is as a part of plans to reduce a possibility of new Korean war and remove a cause of new Korean war structurally. We should prepare to security incentives to clean up North Korean security concerns. Furthermore, we should also prepare to pursue Korean peace treaty with Inter-korean arms control as the security incentives. There are two scenarios which achieve the Korean peace treaty finally such as 2-stage scenario including Inter-Korean basic agreement and 3-stage scenario including Inter-Korean agreement and Inter-Korean peace agreement. Considering the changed security situations around Korean peninsula such as North Korea’s nuclear weapons and severe competitions among Great powers in the North-east Asia, the later 3-stage scenario would be more reliable approach.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (8)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (21)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[other] 국가안보실 / 2014 / 희망의 새 시대 국가안보전략 / 청와대

[other] 김성욱 / 2010 / 평화협정 제안은 주한미군철수 주장일 뿐 / 인터넷신문 New Daily

[other] 김필재 / 2013 / 北 핵공갈 목표는 미-북 '평화협정' 체결 / 인터넷신문 New Daily

[other] 김찬규 / 2007 / 한국 휴전협정, 종전선언이 필요한가? / 세계일보

[book] 남만권 / 2004 / 군비통제 이론과 실제 / 한국국방연구원

[other] 조국평화통일위원회 / 2014 / 박근혜의 유엔총회연설은 반통일대결망동 / 조선중앙통신

[other] 조선중앙통신사 / 2014 / 북남관계개선분위기를 흐리게 하는 부당한 처사의 진상을 밝힌다 / 조선중앙통신

[book] 조성렬 / 2012 / 뉴한반도비전 : 비핵 평화와 통일의 길 / 백산서당

[journal] 조성렬 / 2013 / 한반도 신뢰프로세스와 균형정책 : 안보 및 평화 분야 / 한반도 군비통제 / 국방부 53

[journal] 조성렬 / 2014 / The Causes of Diplomatic Failure to Solve North Korean Nuke Issues and Its Policy Implications: Rethinking Six-Party Talks and Resumption Issues / 국제관계연구 / 일민국제관계연구원 19(2) : 67~101

[journal] 평화재단 / 2013 / 휴전 60년, 개성공단 10년 그리고 새 정부의 출범 / 현안진단 (70)

[other] 통일부 / 2000 / 4자회담 주요쟁점에 대한 각측 입장 비교(제1차 4자회담~제6자 4자회담) / 통일부

[book] 황진환 / 2003 / 한국의 안보와 군비통제 / 봉명

[journal] 황진환 / 2011 / 남북한 군사적 신뢰구축과 군비통제 추진 방향 / 한반도 군비통제 / 국방부 49

[journal] Editorial / 2013 / Abe’s ‘proactive’ pacifism should not be used to promote collective self-defense / Asahi Shimbun 28

[journal] Galtung, Johan / 1969 / Violence, Peace and Peace Research / Journal of Peace Research 6(3)

[web] Office of the Spokesperson / 2015 / U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue Outcomes of the Strategic Track / U.S. Department of State / http://www.state.gov/r/prs/ps/2015/06/244205.html

[other] Sanger, David E. / 2014 / U. S. Confronts Consequences of Underestimating North Korean Leader / The New York Times

[book] Schelling, Thomas C. / 1985 / Strategy and Arms Control / Pergamon-Brassey

[web] Wilmerding, John / 2009 / The Theory of Active Peace / Peace, Conflict and Development Research / http://www.internationalpeaceandconflict.org/forum/topics/the-theory-of-active-peace#VFE6DdEcTb0

[other] Xinhua / 2009 / China Urges U.S. to Accommodates DPRK’s ‘Resonable Security Concerns’ /

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status