In this paper, I tried to explain that the classification of active and passive euthanasia is not of great significance in the ethical discussion of euthanasia.
For this purpose, the grounds for distinguishing between active and passive euthanasia were examined. It was clarified that “action,” “omission,” and “an intention to kill” cannot be the basis for distinguishing active and passive euthanasia. This study also proved that if the distinction between active and passive euthanasia fails, the position of banning active euthanasia and allowing passive euthanasia is not successful. In addition, this paper found a logical problem in Rachels' view, according to which active and passive euthanasia can be distinguished by action and omission but active euthanasia should be allowed because no moral difference exists between active and passive euthanasia.
@article{ART002962357}, author={Jang Dong-ik}, title={A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia}, journal={Journal of Humanities}, issn={1598-8457}, year={2023}, number={89}, pages={227-253}
TY - JOUR AU - Jang Dong-ik TI - A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia JO - Journal of Humanities PY - 2023 VL - null IS - 89 PB - Institute for Humanities SP - 227 EP - 253 SN - 1598-8457 AB - In this paper, I tried to explain that the classification of active and passive euthanasia is not of great significance in the ethical discussion of euthanasia.
For this purpose, the grounds for distinguishing between active and passive euthanasia were examined. It was clarified that “action,” “omission,” and “an intention to kill” cannot be the basis for distinguishing active and passive euthanasia. This study also proved that if the distinction between active and passive euthanasia fails, the position of banning active euthanasia and allowing passive euthanasia is not successful. In addition, this paper found a logical problem in Rachels' view, according to which active and passive euthanasia can be distinguished by action and omission but active euthanasia should be allowed because no moral difference exists between active and passive euthanasia. KW - Active Euthanasia;Passive Euthanasia;Action and Omission;Intention To Kill;Slopping Slope Argument DO - UR - ER -
Jang Dong-ik. (2023). A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia. Journal of Humanities, 89, 227-253.
Jang Dong-ik. 2023, "A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia", Journal of Humanities, no.89, pp.227-253.
Jang Dong-ik "A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia" Journal of Humanities 89 pp.227-253 (2023) : 227.
Jang Dong-ik. A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia. 2023; 89 : 227-253.
Jang Dong-ik. "A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia" Journal of Humanities no.89(2023) : 227-253.
Jang Dong-ik. A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia. Journal of Humanities, 89, 227-253.
Jang Dong-ik. A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia. Journal of Humanities. 2023; 89 227-253.
Jang Dong-ik. A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia. 2023; 89 : 227-253.
Jang Dong-ik. "A Critical Inquiry on Arguments over Active and Passive Euthanasia" Journal of Humanities no.89(2023) : 227-253.