A Study of Tibetanlogy Taiwan

HyukJoo Sim

doi:10.18107/japs.2010.17.3.008

The central stages of ‘Studying Tibet(藏學)’ are China(中國) and Taiwan(臺灣) because they have far more quantitatively and qualitatively excellent expert scholars, research institutes, and scholarly journals related to Tibet published from Tang Dynasty(當代) to the present than any other country or region. Although Korea has already shared outstanding dissertations on research trends and characteristics for studying Tibet with China’s academic world, getting to know Taiwan’s research trends and developments, the other major stage, is insufficient. That is why this paper is required and what this paper intends to examine. This paper has the following specific objectives and meanings. First, unlike China’s study trends on Tibet already published and shared in Korea, Taiwan’s research trends and characteristics, the other framework when studying Tibet, have not substantially produced any outcomes in Korea yet. Thus, this paper attempts to take a look at conditions and changes of Taiwan’s study on Tibet from Tang Dynasty to the present and compare and contrast(異同) them to China’s. Second, to conform the first objective, the paper tries to comprehend Taiwan’s research characteristics and trends by analyzing its major research institutes, scholar groups(群), and their dissertations. Third, this paper derives from a personal and scholarly reason that I received a degree for the study on Tibet in Taiwan. Therefore, there exists a chance that my subjective reasoning might threaten the paper’s objectivity and balance. On the other hand, since my longtime study in Taiwan can bring out benefits to profoundly and specifically grasp Taiwan’s study status on Tibet, my academic backgrounds will be more likely to lead the study more practical and realistic. Fourth, today’s study on Tibet is conducted in many fields. Even Korea has accumulated quite a few outstanding personal researches or joint researches among scholars. As a useful tool to introduce the study on Tibet to Korean academic world, this paper will help set up a milestone to activating and directing Korea’s study on Tibet in the future.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)
REFERENCES (19)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[journal] 이동률 / 2005 / The Study Trend of Tibetology and Tibet Policy in China / 중소연구 / 아태지역연구센터 29(3) : 119~142

[book] 김성수 / 2008 / 중국 티베트학의 성립 배경과 티베트사 서술의 특징, in: 중국학자들의 소수민족 역사서술 : 147~190

[book] 林恩顯 / 1989 / 邊政通論 / 華泰出版社

[book] 劉義堂 / 1969 / 中國邊疆民族史 / 台灣中華書局

[book] 周炜 / 2001 / 活佛转世与神秘西藏 / 先智出版社

[book] 林冠群 / 1987 / 中国文化大学史学研究所博士论文 / 中國文化大學

[book] 王明珂 / 1997 / 華夏邊緣-歷史記憶與族群認同 / 允震文化公司

[book] 王吉林 / 1976 / 唐代南詔与李唐关系之研究 / 中国学术著作獎委员会

[book] 張駿逸主編 / 2000 / 欧阳无畏教授逝世八週年紀念論文集 / 蒙藏委員會

[book] 王吉林 / 1988 / 中华民国蒙藏学术会议论文集 / 中国文化大学蒙藏学术研究中心

[journal] 王尧 / 1989 / 藏學研究台灣 / 文刊『西藏研究 (2) : 119~128

[journal] 林恩顯 / 1989 / 近三十年來中國大陸學者的西藏研究分析 / 西藏研究論文集 3 : 305~313

[journal] 林恩显 / 1993 / 民族研究教學的回顧與展望 / 民族學報 (20) : 182~185

[journal] 林恩顯 / 1984 / 國際中國邊疆學術會議紀要 / 邊政研究所 (15) : 189~

[journal] 芮逸夫 / 1960 / 唐代南詔与吐藩 / 文刊『西藏研究』 : 46~79

[journal] 萧金松 / 1986 / 欧阳无畏教授近年所授西藏学课程 / 文刊『西藏研究会迅』 (1) : 14~16

[report] Chang Jiunn Yih / 1984 / A Study of the Relationship between the Mongol Yuan

[thesis] / Dynasty and the Tibet Sa-akya Sect / 박사 / Indiana University

[journal] Chang Jiunn Yih / 1985 / The Relationship between the Yuan and the Sa-skya Sect after Kub-ilai Khan / 文刊『政治大学边政研究所年报』 : 66~92

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status