Privatization of Chinese SOEs: The Transfer of Inefficiency or Effective Market Timing

Tanjin; Kim, Sung-Hwan

doi:10.18107/japs.2018.25.4.008

In this study, we test five sets of conventional theories with respect to privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the transitional economies like China: the efficiency hypothesis, the market liberalization hypothesis, the soft-budget hypothesis, and the financial liability hypothesis, and the constraint hypothesis, In addition, we propose and test another hypothesis of our own, namely the market timing hypothesis, based on the efficient or rational stock market timing behaviors of SOEs in privatization for their success of privatization and for the success of long-term investors as in the developed market economy. With 12,742 observations for most SOEs in China that went public on Shanghai Stock Exchange (SHSE) and Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) for the period 1990-2012, we perform empirical tests for the six hypotheses by using firm-level data and report the following findings. First, the likelihood of privatization for the whole sample increases with higher ROA, rejecting the efficiency hypothesis in that inefficient SOEs can improve their efficiency though privatization. While it decreases with ROA for the profitable firms, it increases with higher ROA for the unprofitable firms. For the separated groups, SOEs can improve their efficiency for better ROAs though privatization, supporting the efficiency hypothesis. Second, the results are mostly same in the models with net income level instead of profitability, which is related to the financial liability hypothesis. Third, the likelihood of privatization for the whole sample increases for firms during the years of stock market liberalization for foreign investors, supporting the market liberalization hypothesis, also for both profitable firms and unprofitable ones. Fourth, the likelihood of privatization for the whole sample increases for firms with positive free cash flows, rejecting the soft budget constraint hypothesis, also for both profitable firms and unprofitable ones. Fifth, the likelihood of privatization for the whole sample increases for firms with higher debt leverage, which is against the constraint hypothesis. While it increases with higher debt ratio for the profitable firms, it decreases with higher debt ratio for the unprofitable firms, the latter supporting the hypothesis. Basically, the conventional hypotheses are mostly rejected as a whole, especially with respect to the soft budget constraint hypothesis while efficiency hypothesis and financial liability hypothesis are supported for profitable firms only, although the market liberalization hypothesis is evidenced to support the effects of the government regulation to expedite privatization of SOEs prior to market liberalization in more recent years. Unlike conventional privatization theories on SOEs in the economies of transition, the test results fully support our market timing for the whole sample and for both profitable firm group and non-profitable firm group. Thus, the central Chinese government or local ones support the privatized firms and public investors by finding appropriate market timing with relatively at a lower PER or stock price level relative to EPS in order to the financial burden of buyers of the government.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (1)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (26)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[thesis] 劉亞琦 / 2011 / 중국 국유기업 민영화가 기업가치에 미치는 영향 / 석사 / 경북대학교 대학원

[journal] Brada, J. C / 2007 / The Optimal Timing of Initial Public Offerings in the Course of Privatization: Theory and an Illustrative Application / Economic Systems 31(2) : 121~137

[other] Brandt, L. / 2003 / Governments, Banks, and Firms: The Case of Privatization in China / Mimeo. Department of Economics. University of Toronto

[journal] Dong, X. / 2006 / Privatization and firm Performance: A Comparison of Rural and Urban Enterprises in China / Journal of Comparative Economics 34 : 608~633

[book] Garnaut, R. / 2003 / A Study of Firm Restructuring in China / The World Bank

[thesis] Guo, K. / 2003 / Market Liberalization and Privatization in China / Master / Beijing University

[journal] Guo, K / 2005 / Causes of Privatization in China: Testing Several Hypotheses / Economics of Transition 13(2) : 211~238

[report] Gupta, N. / 2001 / Priorities and Sequencing in Privatization: Theory and Evidence from the Czech Republic / William Davidson Institute

[report] Joos, P / 2005 / Examining the Price-Earnings Relation in a Real Options Framework with Investor Learning / SSRN

[book] Kornai, J. / 1980 / Economics of Shortage / North Holland

[journal] Kornai, J / 1986 / Soft Budge Constraint / Kyklos 39(1) : 3~30

[book] Kutner, M. H. / 2004 / Applied Linear Regression Models / McGraw-Hill Irwin

[book] Li, D / 2004 / Governance. Regulation and Privatization / University of Chicago Press : 211~230

[journal] Li, H / 2002 / Government’s Budget Constraint, Competition, and Privatization:Evidence from China’s Rural Industry / Journal of Comparative Economics 31 : 486~502

[journal] Li, S. / 2000 / The Road to Capitalism: Competition and Institutional Change in China / Journal of Comparative Economics 28(2) : 269~292

[journal] Lin, Y / 2001 / Ownership Restructuring in Chinese State Industry:An Analysis of Evidence on Initial Organizational Changes / China Quarterly 166 : 305~341

[journal] Megginson, W. L / 2001 / From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization / Journal of Economic Literature 39(2) : 321~389

[book] North, D. / 1990 / Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions / Cambridge University Press : 1~164

[journal] Park, A / 2002 / Joint Liability Lending and the Rise and Fall of China’s Township and Village Enterprises / Journal of Development Economics 71 : 497~531

[other] Su, J / 2003 / A Theory of Decentralized Privatization:Evidence from China / Mimeo. Graduate School of International Economics and Finance. Brandeis University

[journal] Jin Tan / 2017 / Effects of Exports, IPO Duration, and Government Protection on Market Returns of Chinese IPO Firms / 무역연구 / 한국무역연구원 13(3) : 215~236

[journal] Tian, X / 2001 / Privatization and Economic Performance: Evidence from Chinese Provinces / Economic Systems 25(1) : 65~77

[journal] 陳招順 / 2004 / 全球民營化及其啟示 / 上海市經濟學會學術年刊 (8) : 1~14

[journal] 胡一帆 / 2006 / 中國國有企業民營化績效研究 / 經濟研究 (7) : 49~60

[journal] 劉小玄 / 2000 / 中國工業企業的所有制結構對效率差異的影響: 1995年全國工業企業普查數據的實證分析 / 經濟研究 (5) : 21~34

[journal] 單東 / 2004 / 民營化: 經濟調整的戰略選擇 / 經濟學家 (2) : 41~46

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status