Bulk-fill 복합레진과 전통적 복합레진의 물성비교

Tae-Hwan Noh; Eunju Song; Soyoung Park; Ae-Ri Pyo; KWON, YONG HOON; Jiyeon Kim; Shin Kim; JEONG,TAE-SUNG

doi:10.5933/JKAPD.2016.43.4.365

Composites are the most useful restorative material. However, composites have some disadvantages such as polymerization shrinkage, long working time, and susceptibility to water and contamination, which are stood out more especially when treating children. To solve these problems, bulk-fill composites have been developed. The aim of this study is to compare mechanical properties of bulk-fill and conventional composites. Bulk-fill composites (SureFil SDR flow (SDR), Tetric N-Ceram bulk fill (TBF)) and conventional composites (Filtek Z-350 (Z-350), Unifil Flow (UF), Unifil Loflo Plus (UL)) were used. The Vickers hardness tester was used to measure the microhardness of materials, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to measure the degree of conversion. Polymerization shrinkage was measured by using a linometer. Flexural and compressive properties were measured by using the universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Scheffe’s post hoc test. The level of significance was set to p < 0.05. Most conventional composites showed higher microhardness than bulk-fill composites. However, bulk-fill composites showed a higher top/bottom microhardness ratio than conventional composites. Bulk-fill composites showed a higher top/bottom degree of conversion ratio than conventional composites. The polymerization shrinkage was highest in UL and lowest in Z-350. The polymerization shrinkage of flowable composites was higher than that of non flowable composites. The compressive properties were highest in Z-350 and lowest in SDR and UL. In terms of flexural properties, Z-350 was the highest. However, none of the bulk-fill composites exhibited mechanical properties as good as those of conventional composites. Nonetheless, the ratio of microhardness and degree of conversion, which are important properties of bulk filling, were higher in bulk-fill composites. Therefore, the bulk-fill composites might be considered suitable restorative materials in pediatric dentistry.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (2)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (26)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[journal] Rueggeberg FA / 2002 / From vulcanite to vinyl, a history of resins in restorative dentistry / J Prosthet Dent 87 : 364~379

[journal] Kwon YH / 2014 / Polymerization shrinkage, flexural and compression properties of low-shrinkage dental resin composites / Dent Mater 33 : 104~110

[journal] Gee AF / 1993 / True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer / Dent Mater 9 : 11~14

[journal] Krejci I / 2005 / Resin composite shrinkage and marginal adaptation with different pulse-delay light curing protocols / Eur J Oral Sci 113 : 531~536

[journal] Versluis A / 1996 / Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? / J Dent Res 75 : 871~878

[journal] 김인영 / 2008 / 5 years evaluation of composite resin restoration on permanent first molar in children / 대한소아치과학회지 / 대한소아치과학회 35(1) : 110~117

[journal] Benetti AR / 2015 / Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation / Oper Dent 40 : 190~200

[journal] Christensen GJ / 2012 / Advantages and challenges of Bulk-fill resins / Clinicians Report 5 : 1~2

[journal] Jang JH / 2015 / Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk-fill composites and highly filled flowable resin / Oper Dent 40 : 172~180

[journal] Ilie N / 2013 / Bulk-fill Resin-based Composites: An In Vitro Assessment of Their Mechanical Performance / Oper Dent 38 : 618~625

[journal] Craig RG / 1981 / Chemistry, composition, and properties of composite resins / Dent Clin North Am 25 : 219~239

[journal] Par M / 2014 / Effect of temperature on post-cure polymerization of bulk-fill composites / J Dent 42 : 1255~1260

[journal] Bucuta S / 2014 / Light transmittance and micromechanical properties of bulk fill vs conventional resin based composites / Clin Oral Investig 18 : 1991~2000

[journal] Roulet JF / 1984 / Influence of oral fluid on composite resin and glass-ionomer cement / J Prosthet Dent 52 : 182~189

[journal] Ilie N / 2014 / An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composite to permanent and deciduous teeth / J Dent 42 : 850~855

[journal] Alshali RZ / 2013 / Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventionalresin-composites at two time intervals / Dent Mater 29 : e213~e217

[journal] de Gee AJ / 1984 / Color dye for identification of incompletely cured composite resins / J Prosthet Dent 52 : 626~631

[journal] Sideridou I / 2002 / Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in lightcured dimethacrylate-based dental resins / Biomater 23 : 1819~1829

[journal] Rodrigues Junior SA / 2007 / Flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of different types of resin-based composites / Braz Oral Res 21 : 16~21

[journal] Ferracane JL / 2013 / Resin-based composite performance:are there some things we can’t predict? / Dent Mater 29 : 51~58

[journal] Ilie N / 2011 / Investigations on a methacrylatebased flowable composite based on the SDR technology / Dent Mater 27 : 348~355

[journal] Khatri CA / 2003 / Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of urethane derivatives of Bis-GMA / Dent Mater 19 : 584~588

[journal] Zivko-Babic J / 2002 / Bite force in subjects with complete dentition / Coll Antropol 26 : 293~302

[journal] Mountain G / 2011 / Bite force measurement in children with primary dentition / Int J Paediatr Dent 21 : 112~118

[journal] 이한별 / 2015 / Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Bulk-fill Resin Composites / 대한소아치과학회지 / 대한소아치과학회 42(4) : 281~290 / http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2015.42.4.281

[journal] Campos EA / 2014 / Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites / J Dent 42 : 575~581

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status