Lateral Cephalometric Measurements of Class I Malocclusion Patients with Uncertainty

Ji Min Lee; Ji-Soo Song; Hong-Keun Hyun; Kim, Young J; Kim, JungWook; Jang, KiTaeg; Sang-Hoon Lee; Hojae Kim; Hyo-Min Cho; Shin Teo Jeon

doi:10.5933/JKAPD.2018.45.1.65

The aim of this study was to obtain the traceability of the software used to analyze lateral cephalometry and to calculate the uncertainty of the measurements. Furthermore, this study aimed to provide a basis for obtaining standard references for measurement values for orthodontic treatment in children. Cephalometric data were collected from 100 children diagnosed with class I malocclusion between the ages 6 to 13 years who visited the pediatric dentist at Seoul National University Dental Hospital. To ensure traceability, a phantom device was created. Correction values were calculated by measuring the length and angle of the phantom device using the software. Type A uncertainty was calculated by obtaining the standard deviation of cephalometric measurements of 100 persons and the standard error of repeated measurements. Determination of the type B uncertainty was induced by minimum resolution and the position of the head. Using these, the combined standard uncertainty was obtained and the expanded uncertainty was calculated. The results of this study confirm that the currently used software has high accuracy and reliability. Furthermore, the uncertainty of orthodontic measurements in Korean children aged 6 to 13 years was calculated, and distribution range for class I malocclusion with 95% confidence interval was suggested.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (1)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (21)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[web] Bureau international des Poids et Mesures / 0000 / Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement JCGM 100:2008 (GUM 1995 with minor corrections) / http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf

[journal] 최성운 / 2007 / Model Classification and Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty / 대한안전경영과학회지 / 대한안전경영과학회 9(1) : 145~156

[journal] Taverniers I / 2004 / Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. I. Traceability and measurement uncertainty of analytical results / Trends Analyt Chem 23 : 480~490 / 10.1016/S0165-9936(04)00733-2

[journal] Squara P / 2015 / Metrology in Medicine: From Measurements to Decision, with Specific Reference to Anesthesia and Intensive Care / Anesth Analg 120 : 66~75 / 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000477

[journal] Broadbent BH / 1931 / A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia: the introduction of cephalometric radiography / Angle Orthod 51 : 93~114

[journal] Downs WB / 1948 / Variations in facial relationships: Their significance in treatment and prognosis / Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 34 : 812~840 / 10.1016/0002-9416(48)90015-3

[journal] Chen YJ / 2004 / The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry / Angle Orthod 74 : 155~161

[journal] Baskin H / 1997 / A comparison of two computer cephalometric programs / J Clin Orthod 31 : 231~233

[journal] Gotfren E / 1999 / Development of a system for craniofacial analysis from monitor-displayed digital images / Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28 : 123~126 / 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600420

[journal] Yu SH / 2008 / Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images / Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133 : 7901~7906

[journal] Power G / 2005 / Dolphin Imaging Software: an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction / Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34 : 619~626 / 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.003

[journal] 박찬영 / 2015 / Facemask Effects in Two Types of Intraoral Appliances : Bonded Expander vs. Hyrax / 대한소아치과학회지 / 대한소아치과학회 42(1) : 45~52 / http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2015.42.1.45

[journal] 박성희 / 2017 / The Simple Regression Model of Gonial Angles : Comparison between Panoramic Radiographs and Lateral Cephalograms / 대한소아치과학회지 / 대한소아치과학회 44(2) : 129~137 / https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2017.44.2.129

[journal] Sandler PJ / 1988 / Reproducibility of Cephalometric Measurements / Br J Orthod 15 : 105~110 / 10.1179/bjo.15.2.105

[journal] AlBarakati S / 2012 / The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods / Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41 : 11~17 / 10.1259/dmfr/37010910

[journal] Santoro M / 2006 / Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique / Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 : 345~351 / 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.010

[journal] Farooq MU / 2016 / Assessing the Reliability of Digitalized Cephalometric Analysis in Comparison with Manual Cephalometric Analysis / J Clin Diagn Res 10 : 20~23

[journal] Leonardi R / 2008 / Automatic cephalometric analysis: a systematic review / Angle Orthod 78 : 145~151 / 10.2319/120506-491.1

[journal] Cohen A / 1984 / Uncertainty in cephalometrics / Br J Orthod 11 : 44~48 / 10.1179/bjo.11.1.44

[journal] Ahlqvist J / 1986 / The effect of projection errors on cephalometric length measurements / Eur J Orthod 8 : 141~148 / 10.1093/ejo/8.3.141

[book] Hiroshi N / 1984 / Orthodontic diagnosis in bioprogressive therapy, 1st ed / Rocky Mountain Morita Co. : 45~54

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status