Domestic software test maturity level is the most Level 2 below based on TMMi. The first condition of enhancement of test maturity is that know exactly what the current maturity. There is no Level 1 definition in TMMi, but even the same level of maturity level of an organization, there are clear differences. In this study, grasp a maturity level of Level 1 organization, while less effort to improve in Level organization, the ways to achieve Level 2 is presented. Sub practices with dependencies in Level 2 is grouped with the corresponding process areas and define a Level 1 newly at 3 phases. If sub practices with dependencies are tied and improve a process, it will produce the effect which attains the practices all at once. Verify the adequacy of three phases, as a result, an organization clearly identify Test Maturity Level 1, we know that the organization can set specific improvement goals and direction.
@article{ART001508846}, author={김선준 and RHEW SUNG YUL and 오기성}, title={A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis}, journal={Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information}, issn={1598-849X}, year={2010}, volume={15}, number={12}, pages={189-196}
TY - JOUR AU - 김선준 AU - RHEW SUNG YUL AU - 오기성 TI - A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis JO - Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information PY - 2010 VL - 15 IS - 12 PB - The Korean Society Of Computer And Information SP - 189 EP - 196 SN - 1598-849X AB - Domestic software test maturity level is the most Level 2 below based on TMMi. The first condition of enhancement of test maturity is that know exactly what the current maturity. There is no Level 1 definition in TMMi, but even the same level of maturity level of an organization, there are clear differences. In this study, grasp a maturity level of Level 1 organization, while less effort to improve in Level organization, the ways to achieve Level 2 is presented. Sub practices with dependencies in Level 2 is grouped with the corresponding process areas and define a Level 1 newly at 3 phases. If sub practices with dependencies are tied and improve a process, it will produce the effect which attains the practices all at once. Verify the adequacy of three phases, as a result, an organization clearly identify Test Maturity Level 1, we know that the organization can set specific improvement goals and direction. KW - DO - UR - ER -
김선준, RHEW SUNG YUL and 오기성. (2010). A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 15(12), 189-196.
김선준, RHEW SUNG YUL and 오기성. 2010, "A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis", Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, vol.15, no.12 pp.189-196.
김선준, RHEW SUNG YUL, 오기성 "A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis" Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information 15.12 pp.189-196 (2010) : 189.
김선준, RHEW SUNG YUL, 오기성. A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis. 2010; 15(12), 189-196.
김선준, RHEW SUNG YUL and 오기성. "A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis" Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information 15, no.12 (2010) : 189-196.
김선준; RHEW SUNG YUL; 오기성. A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 15(12), 189-196.
김선준; RHEW SUNG YUL; 오기성. A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information. 2010; 15(12) 189-196.
김선준, RHEW SUNG YUL, 오기성. A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis. 2010; 15(12), 189-196.
김선준, RHEW SUNG YUL and 오기성. "A Decomposition Method for TMMi Maturity Level 1 using Process Area Dependency Analysis" Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information 15, no.12 (2010) : 189-196.