A Moderating Effect of Use of Interaction Privacy Controls on the Relationship between Privacy Concerns and Self-disclosure
2020, 25(3), pp.235-241
Publisher : The Korean Society Of Computer And Information
Research Area : Computer Science
-
Many studies have tried to explain the privacy paradox but reported conflicting results; Some of them found connection between privacy concerns and information disclosure, while others did not. This study examines the role of interaction privacy controls (mainly friend lists and privacy settings) as a moderating variable that has the potential to affect the relationship in the SNS context. The reason for this is that most users use interactive privacy controls to create their own social environment before conducting SNS activities, so the relationship between privacy concerns and information disclosure may vary depending on the degree of use of interactive privacy controls. The study collected data using survey method, analyzed the moderating effect of use of interaction privacy controls using hierarchical multiple regression analysis, and as a result, found that effect. Therefore, the degree of use of interactive privacy controls may be an important contingent variable that needs to be considered in a study examining the privacy paradox in SNS context.
-
[confproc] D. Wilson / 2012 / Unpacking the Privacy Paradox:Irrational Decision Making within the Privacy Calculus / Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2012)
[web] TRUSTe / 2016 / U.S. Consumer Privacy Index / https://www.truste.com/resources/privacy-research/ncsa-consumer-privacy-index-us/
[journal] A. Gruzd / 2018 / Privacy Concerns and Self-Disclosure in Private and Public Uses of Social Media / Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 21(7) : 418~428
[journal] S. Kokolakis / 2017 / Privacy Attitudes and Privacy Behaviour : A Review of Current Research on the Privacy Paradox Phenomenon / Computers & Security 64 : 122~134
[journal] K. Degirmenci / 2020 / Mobile Users’ Information Privacy Concerns and the Role of App Permission Requests / International Journal of Information Management 50 : 261~272
[journal] N. Gerber / 2018 / Explaining the Privacy Paradox-a Systematic Review of Literature Investigating Privacy Attitude and Behavior / Computers & Security 77(8) : 226~261
[journal] P. Wisniewski / 2016 / Framing and Measuring Multi-dimensional Interpersonal Privacy Preferences of Social Networking Site Users / Communications of the Association for Information Systems 38 : 235~258
[journal] H. Li / 2011 / The Role of Affect and Cognition on Online Consumers' Decision to Disclose Personal Information to Unfamiliar Online Vendors / Decision Support Systems 51(3) : 434~445
[journal] T. Dinev / 2013 / Information Privacy and Correlates : An Empirical Attempt to Bridge and Distinguish Privacy-Related Concepts / European Journal of Information Systems 22(3) : 295~316
[journal] L. R. Wheeless / 1976 / Conceptualization and Measurement of Reported Self-Disclosure / Human Communication Research 2(4) : 338~346
[journal] A. Nadkarni / 2012 / Why Do People Use Facebook? / Personality and Individual Differences 52 : 243~249
[report] G. Blank / 2014 / A New Privacy Paradox / University of Oxford, Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre
[web] C. Lutz / 2014 / Privacy Concerns and Online Behavior – Not So Paradoxical after All? Viewing the Privacy Paradox through Different Theoretical Lenses, Working paper / http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2425132
[journal] A. Young / 2013 / Privacy Protection Strategies on Facebook : The Internet Privacy Paradox Revisited / Information, Communication & Society 16(4) : 479~500
[journal] D. boyd / 2010 / Facebook Privacy Settings : Who Cares? / First Monday 15(8) : 2~
[journal] M. Taddicken / 2014 / The ‘Privacy Paradox’ in the Social Web : The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-disclosure / Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(2) : 248~273
[journal] H. Chen / 2015 / Couldn’t or Wouldn't? The Influence of Privacy Concerns and Self-efficacy in Privacy Management on Privacy Protection / Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18(1) : 13~19
[confproc] T. Hughes-Roberts / 2013 / Privacy and Social Networks: Is Concern a Valid Indicator of Intention and Behaviour? / Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom 2013) : 8~14
[confproc] B. Reynolds / 2011 / Sharing Ephemeral Information in Online Social Networks:Privacy Perceptions and Behaviours / Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2011) : 5~9
[journal] Z. Tufekci / 2008 / Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites / Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 28(1) : 20~36
[book] S. Margulis / 2011 / Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web / Springer : 9~17
[book] I. Altman / 1975 / The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Ppersonal Space, Territory, Crowding / Brooks/Cole Publishing Company
[book] S. Trepte / 2011 / Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web / Springer : 9~17
[journal] E. Christofides / 2009 / Information Control and Disclosure on Facebook : Are They Two Sides of the Same Coin or Two Different Processes? / Cyberpsychology and Behavior 12(3) : 341~345
[journal] S. Lin / 2019 / Beyond Information : The Role of Territory in Privacy Management Behavior on Social Networking Sites / Journal of the Association for Information Systems 20(4) : 434~475
[journal] B. Choi / 2015 / Embarrassing Exposures in Online Social Networks : An Integrated Perspective of Privacy Invasion and Relationship Bonding / Information Systems Research 24(4) : 675~694
[journal] H. Krasnova / 2010 / Online Social Networks : Why We Disclose / Journal of Information Technology 25 : 109~125
-
KCI Citation (0)
97 Viewed
Print this page
Download PDF