Prospect and Retrospect of the National-Merit Person Policy in South Korea - Focused on Its Target Population and Benefits

Jin-Young Oh

doi:10.17000/kspr.15.1.200807.39

This article’s objective is to review the South Korea’s "National-Merit Person(NMP)" policy, which has been implemented for the purpose of inspiring patriotism and achieving national integration since the Armistice of the Korean War, and to suggest alternative policies for its reform. The results of the study indicate that the NMP policy of South Korea has not properly adapted itself to changing national and international environments and has not reflected people’s consciousness in a timely manner. This is due to the excessive political intervention in the process of determining the scope of policy target(entitlement) and compensation standards(benefits). In terms of the former, there are three major problems. First, South Korea has failed to build a social consensus on who is entitled to receive honorable treatments as a NMP. As a result, some people insist unreasonably that they deserve honorable treatments and benefits. Second, laws and regulations regarding NMP policies are not well coordinated and often incompatible since there has been a vicious circle of improvised enactment and revision of laws resulted from political influence seeking party interests. Third, administrative jargons used in the NMP policy have placed their focus excessively on values, thereby provoking social conflicts rather than generating national integration, and creating unnecessary tension between the government and the people. With regard to the latter, there are also three major critical issues. First, incessant complaints about compensation level and disputes over its fairness have been prevalent among NMPs because of ambiguous definitions of the character of compensation, entitlement and compensation rates. Second, allowances have been introduced to complement the compensation program but failed to fulfill their initial goal of guaranteeing the quality of life to a certain degree for NMPs taking their individual socio-economic conditions into account. Third, social affirmative actions that provide various assistances and benefits to NMPs in terms of education, employment, healthcare and public transportation have turned out to be the cause of ethical problems- i.e. too generous benefits and free riders. In conclusion, the current NMP policy of South Korea must be reformed as follows; First, the scope of NMP entitlement should be reorganized reflecting national sentiments so as to clearly specify who is entitled to the honorable treatments. Second, the administrative jargons should be replaced with more descriptive and functional ones to keep NMPs from demanding privileges excessively. Third, public skepticism toward the NMP policy should be changed. The policy has caused confusion among people because of a lack of clear definition distinguishing the object of respect and honor from the recipient of compensation. Fourth, compensation rates for NMPs have to be rescheduled properly so as to end the disputes over unfairness regarding how much money the State should give to a NMP to repay his/her sacrifice in a token of everlasting gratitude to them. Fifth and lastly, affirmative actions should reflect national sentiments and be revised to get rid of problems such as moral hazards of free riders resulted from excessively generous benefits.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (15)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (35)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[book] 국가보훈처 / 2005a / 외국보훈제도 종합비교연구: 미국?독일?프랑스? 호주?대만 편 / 국가보훈처

[book] 국가보훈처 / 2005b / 보훈보상금체계 개편 방안 / 국가보훈처

[book] 국가보훈처 / 2005c / 세계속의 보훈 / 국가보훈처

[book] 국가보훈처 / 2006 / 세계속의 보훈 / 국가보훈처

[book] 국가보훈처 / 2007a / 국민보훈의식지수 조사보고서 / 국가보훈처

[book] 국가보훈처 / 2007b / 국가보훈대상체계 개편방안 / 국가보훈처

[book] 국가보훈처 / 2008 / 2008년도 보훈사업개요 / 국가보훈처

[journal] 김상균 / 2004 / Rationalizing the Classification System of Patriots and Veterans / 사회복지연구 25 : 5~34

[book] 김승권 / 2007 / 한국의 국가보훈체계 개편연구 / 한국보건사회연구원

[journal] 김용하 / 2005 / 국가보훈연금체계의 개선방안 연구 / 사회보장연구 21(1) : 201~231

[confproc] 김용하 / 2008 / 국가보훈체계 선진화 방안 모색 / 한국보훈학회 2008년도 춘계학술회의

[book] 김종성 / 2005 / 한국보훈정책론 / 일진사

[book] 김태성 / 2000 / 복지국가론 / 나남

[journal] 박효종 / 2004 / 한국의 보훈이념 정립을 위한 고찰 / 군사논단 (38) : 45~63

[book] 서울보훈병원 / 2004 / 국내?외장애평가제도 비교연구 / 서울보훈병원

[thesis] 안태형 / 1999 / 영국 노동계급의 애국주의(Patriotism) / 석사 / 서울대학교

[journal] 오진영 / 2007 / 한국사회 국가유공자 담론의 활성화 요인에 관한 질적 연구 / 상황과 복지 (23) : 165~209

[book] 유영옥 / 2005 / 국가보훈학 / 홍익제

[thesis] 이미진 / 2005 / 우리나라 장애평가 관련 법률에 관한 연구 / 석사 / 연세대학교

[book] 이영환 / 2003 / 차별과 배제의 복지정책과 담론, 통합과 배제의 사회정책과 담론 / 함께 읽는 책 : 77~128

[book] 이충열 / 2005 / 보훈복지정책의 혁신비전 / 학민사

[journal] 전광석 / 2004 / The principles for the further formation of the compensation and programms for the national victims / 헌법학연구 10(4) : 225~263

[book] 전광석 / 2005 / 한국사회보장법론 / 법문사

[journal] 조승래 / 1998 / 애국주의에 대한 역사적 고찰 / 교육과학연구 11(3) : 75~91

[book] 최병권 / 1999 / 대안은 열린 애국주의다 / 열린 책들

[book] 홍미령 / 2005 / 국가유공자 노후복지 발전방안연구 / 한국노인문제연구소

[book] Anderson, B. / 2002 / 상상의 공동체: 민족주의의 기원과 전파에 대한 성찰 / 나남

[journal] Campbell, A. / 2004 / The invisible welfare state: Establishing the phenomenon of twentieth century veteran's benefits / Journal of Political and Military Sociology 32(2) : 249~267

[journal] Gal, J. / 1998 / Categorical benefits in welfare states: Findings from Great Britain and Israel / Internationational Social Security Review 51(1) : 73~101

[book] Gilbert, N. / 2007 / 사회복지정책론: 분석틀과 선택의 차원 / 나눔의 집

[book] Nussbaum, M. / 2003 / 나라를 사랑한다는 것: 애국주의와 세계시민주의의 한계 논쟁 / 삼인

[journal] Olsen, A. / 2006 / Military veterans and social security / Social Security Bulletin 66(2) : 1~6

[journal] Siegel, I. / 1948 / Public expenditures for veterans' assistance / Journal of Political Economy 56(6) : 527~532

[book] Skocpol, H. / 1992 / Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States / Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

[book] U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs / 2007 / Federal Benefits for Veterans and Dependents / Author

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status