It's the time to innovate an academic discourse of Korean classical literature. Until now, academic discourses of classical literature were created either through excessive positivistic under-interpretation or through excessive metaphysical over-interpretation. Those methods which represent a fact-centered perspective and an idea-centered perspective respectively commit the fault that makes one of them reduced to another. It is the reason why academic discourses of classical literature in Korea tend not to be opened, but to be exclusive.
Between a fact and an idea, a language that mediates two opposite sides is needed. It is presented as a theory in academic discourse. Therein diverse interrelations between diverse facts and diverse ideas are created and, also, they create diverse discursive networks. They always open new horizon by innovating themselves. Academic discourse of classical literature today has to participate in such a productive discursive work which creates new meanings incessantly.
@article{ART001306067}, author={Hyosup Song}, title={Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice}, journal={The Research of the Korean Classic}, issn={1226-3850}, year={2008}, volume={0}, number={18}, pages={137-158}
TY - JOUR AU - Hyosup Song TI - Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice JO - The Research of the Korean Classic PY - 2008 VL - 0 IS - 18 PB - The Research Of The Korean Classic SP - 137 EP - 158 SN - 1226-3850 AB - It's the time to innovate an academic discourse of Korean classical literature. Until now, academic discourses of classical literature were created either through excessive positivistic under-interpretation or through excessive metaphysical over-interpretation. Those methods which represent a fact-centered perspective and an idea-centered perspective respectively commit the fault that makes one of them reduced to another. It is the reason why academic discourses of classical literature in Korea tend not to be opened, but to be exclusive.
Between a fact and an idea, a language that mediates two opposite sides is needed. It is presented as a theory in academic discourse. Therein diverse interrelations between diverse facts and diverse ideas are created and, also, they create diverse discursive networks. They always open new horizon by innovating themselves. Academic discourse of classical literature today has to participate in such a productive discursive work which creates new meanings incessantly. KW - Classical Literature;Positivistic Under-interpretation;Metaphysical Over-interpretation;Theory;Discourse DO - UR - ER -
Hyosup Song. (2008). Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice. The Research of the Korean Classic, 0(18), 137-158.
Hyosup Song. 2008, "Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice", The Research of the Korean Classic, vol.0, no.18 pp.137-158.
Hyosup Song "Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice" The Research of the Korean Classic 0.18 pp.137-158 (2008) : 137.
Hyosup Song. Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice. 2008; 0(18), 137-158.
Hyosup Song. "Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice" The Research of the Korean Classic 0, no.18 (2008) : 137-158.
Hyosup Song. Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice. The Research of the Korean Classic, 0(18), 137-158.
Hyosup Song. Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice. The Research of the Korean Classic. 2008; 0(18) 137-158.
Hyosup Song. Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice. 2008; 0(18), 137-158.
Hyosup Song. "Crisis of Classical Literature and Innovation of Discursive Practice" The Research of the Korean Classic 0, no.18 (2008) : 137-158.