Maewoldang Kim Siseup’s Understanding of Poyi and Meaning

Lee Hongshik

The researcher has meanwhile strived to apprehend types of Poyi acception and historical contexts of Poyi discourse in Chosun period. This paper is laid on extension of this research. Especially this paper takes note on Kim Siseup’s Praise for Poyi and Sukjai(伯夷叔齊贊) and Hiding Noblemen Theory(君子隱現論) opening the first step of Poyi discourse in Chosun period. These two works concretely showed not only aspects of early Poyi discourse but also internal base of Kim Siseup’s life filling of hiding. So this paper newly constructs truth of Poyi understanding projected in two works in the level of loyalty and reclusion. And I read intention of Kim Siseup’s writing connected with politic․social context in those time which was destroying of politics of royal statesmanship as Kaeyu suppression(癸酉靖亂), and evaluate value of works. Finally, I am finished a certain course with defining meaning and inspecting position of two works in the field of Poyi discourse during Chosun period. As a result, Kim Siseup’s Praise for Poyi and Sukjai(伯夷叔齊贊) and Hiding Noblemen Theory(君子隱現論) were representative works projected Kim Siseup’s view of loyalty and reclusion realizing life of Poyi. Especially Praise for Poyi and Sukjai(伯夷叔齊贊) the praise genre adding debate was a controversial work criticizing King Sejo and meritorious retainers of suppression with comparing King Mu and Taegong. These had a lot of suggesting things in politic․social context in those time. Also in the field of Poyi discourse, Praise for Poyi and Sukjai(伯夷叔齊贊) was the first and the last works that criticized King Mu and Taegong in Poyi’s the view of loyalty. This fact have another meaning. However Poyi discourse had a limit that did not become concretization and sharpening with absenting analytic․critic approach. This is an early limit in Poyi discourse. Of course, Kim Siseup’s Poyi theory and view of reclusion did not cancel out meaning, because these consistently influenced to intellectuals of Seoin group engaging with working Poyang after the mid of 17C beyond those time.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (4)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (23)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[other] 金時習 / 梅月堂集, 한국문집총간

[other] 金昌翕 / 三淵集, 한국문집총간

[other] 成海應 / 硏經齋集, 한국문집총간

[other] 宋時烈 / 宋子大全, 한국문집총간

[other] 李德馨 / 漢陰文藁, 한국문집총간

[other] 李廷馨 / 知退堂集, 한국문집총간

[other] 鄭蘊 / 桐溪集, 한국문집총간

[other] 車天輅 / 五山集, 한국문집총간

[book] 김성룡 / 1995 / 여말선초의 문학사상 / 한길사 : 105~115

[journal] 김용흠 / 2007 / The Perception of Politics during the Reign of King Sejo and the Saengyuksin / 역사와 현실 / 한국역사연구회 (64) : 233~263

[journal] 김종구 / 2001 / 김시습의 방외적 삶과 현실주의시세계 / 개신어문연구 / 개신어문학회 18 : 73~111

[journal] 김종서 / 2007 / Literature and Spirit of Pak Paeng-Nyon / 동방한문학 / 동방한문학회 (32) : 33~66

[journal] 박영호 / 1986 / 매월당의 문학인식과 애민시 / 문학과 언어 / 문학과언어연구회 7 : 99~120

[thesis] 박재홍 / 2009 / 김시습 문학에 나타난 역사인물의 형상화 연구 / 석사 / 고려대학교 교육대학원

[journal] 신성환 / 2011 / The shift of the Discussion of Sayukshin and the Aspects of the Acceptance of Poetry of Late Choseon Dynasty / 민족문학사연구 / 민족문학사학회 (46) : 322~355

[book] 심경호 / 2003 / 김시습평전 / 돌베개 : 287~482

[journal] 심경호 / 2001 / 김시습과 서거정 / 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학) / 한민족어문학회 (38) : 185~224

[journal] 이승수 / 2001 / 17세기 후반 사대부의 김시습 수용 양상과 그 의미 / 한국한문학연구 / 한국한문학회 28 : 187~215

[journal] 이운구 / 1976 / 매월당의 애민의식과 시의 성격 / 한국한문학연구 / 한국한문학연구회 1 : 19~42

[journal] 이의철 / 2005 / Problem of ‘Eun-il(seclusion)’ and Power of Bureaucracy Follower of Choseon(朝鮮) First Half Year / 어문연구(語文硏究) / 한국어문교육연구회 33(2) : 405~430

[journal] 이홍식 / 2011 / An Aspect of Boyi Acception in the Late Joseon Dynasty - rereading of Boyiron(two volumes) of Yeonam Park Jiwon - / 韓國古典硏究 / 한국고전연구학회 (23) : 67~100

[book] 정우봉 / 2005 / 한문 산문의 분석 방법과 실제 비평-조선시대<백이열전>비평자료를 중심으로, In 한국 한문학 연구의 새 지평 / 소명출판사 : 861~

[journal] 정출헌 / 2005 / 김시습과 서거정: 조선전기 사대부 문인의 두 초상 / 동양한문학연구 / 동양한문학회 21 : 223~

이 논문은 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 작성되었습니다.

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status