Quality Factors and SLA for Cloud Digital Records

LEE UK HYUN; Lee Young Kon

doi:10.34163/jkits.2018.13.6.017

Recently, many companies or organizations are introducing cloud services for managing digital records. Cloud services can dramatically reduce the cost of archiving and managing digital records, and provide a foundation for resilient management of digital records, depending on the business environment. Many companies and organizations outsource management of digital records to the cloud. Generally, companies sign SLA contracts when outsourcing computing systems to the cloud. This means that they will pay for the usage of the service while expecting cloud service more or less quantitative level. Customers who request cloud record management services want to be assured that their records are kept in trust in the cloud while meeting records requirements. The cloud record management service provider wants to know which quality items or criteria associated with records should be used to manage records. To establish a cloud record management service SLA, customers and service providers must be aware of each other's interrelationships, make a clear statement of their requirements and expectations, and agree on them. Because cloud services pay for service usage and satisfaction, the SLA must be defined for the purpose so that the customer and service provider can provide services that are mutually satisfactory. This paper describes the requirements for ensuring the quality of cloud record management services and the quality items and classification schemes and key indicators and values required for establishing SLAs.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (2)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (15)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2022년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[journal] 나종회 / 2011 / Qualitative Study on Service Features for Cloud Computing / 디지털콘텐츠학회논문지 / 한국디지털콘텐츠학회 12(3) : 319~327

[confproc] M. M. Qiu / 2013 / Systematic analysis of public cloud service level agreements and related business values / Proceedings of International Conference on Services Computing : 729~736

[confproc] C. Wu / 2013 / The SLA evaluation model for cloud computing / Proceedings of International Conference on Computer, Networks and Communication Engineering : 331~334

[confproc] Y. Ahn / 2013 / Quality metrics and SLA models based on Cross-cutting for cloud service intermediation / Proceedings of International Conference on infomation Society : 61~66

[other] / 2010 / Quality factor for establishing cloud computing SLAs / CCForum

[confproc] E. Badidi / 2013 / A cloud service broker for SLA-based SaaS provisioning / Proceedings of International Conference on Information Society : 61~66

[confproc] H. He / 2013 / Towards an SLA-Driven cache adjustment approach for applications on PaaS / Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware : 11~20

[confproc] I. Ayadi / 2013 / SLA approach for cloud as a service / Proceedings of International Conference on Cloud Computing, IEEE Computer Society : 966~967

[confproc] M. Alhamad / 2010 / Conceptual SLA framework for cloud computing / Proceedings of International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies : 606~610

[confproc] K. Stamou / 2013 / A SLA graph model for data services / Proceeding of International Workshop on Cloud data management : 27~34

[confproc] Y. Ahn / 2014 / Cloud services a flexible based service analysis model for mediation / Korea Computer Science Conference

[confproc] S. Hussain / 2013 / A SLA conceptual framework for monitoring QoS in smart grid / Proceedings of IEEE Grenoble on PowerTech : 1~6

[confproc] S. Venticinque / 2011 / A cloud agency for SLA negotiation and management / Proceedings of Euro-Parallel Processing Workshops : 587~594

[confproc] Z. Wang / 2011 / Policy-based SLAAware cloud service provision framework / Proceedings of International Conference on Semantics Knowledge and Grid : 114~121

[confproc] C. Wu / 2013 / The SLA Evaluation model for cloud computing / Proceedings of International Conference on Computer, Networks and Communication Engineering : 331~334

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status