Linkage·Stepwise Writing Class Model Using Debate: Focus on the Cases of Basic Liberal Writing Classes in University

So Pil Gyun

doi:10.23016/kllj.2020.75.75.333

Classes using debate are effective in improving the ability of argumentative writing. Ability to write arguments becomes the foundation of academic writing, which is the ultimate goal of university writing. System of logical thinking and ability to argue improve in the process of preparing and executing the actual debate. The process of creating pros and cons of a debate topic is the same as the process of constructing a structure of arguments and becomes the basis of academic writing. This study suggests a teaching method using debate that carries out all the basic courses of Korean language education composed of ‘reading·listening·speaking·writing’ as a way to overcome difficulties in teaching writing. This teaching method is a class program that allows students to write arguments, which is the last step of debate class model, systematically and naturally because these four areas are linked together. This study suggests a class model that gets completed through the process of ‘preparing pre-debate materials’→‘cases of actual debate classes’→‘argumentative writing of debate topic’ based on actual class experiences. This class model gets completed step by step in a systematic way through linked interaction and systematic methods in the process of using various activities before and after the debate and writing activities of various elements. The effect of writing classes that applied debate can be summarized as the effect of preparation and execution of debate and the effect of judgement and jury’s opinion. Data investigation constructs the reason of opinion and background of argument, and cross inquiry is effective in strengthening argumentative power and the core of writing by focusing on the radical point. Decision and opinion of juries are specifically reflected in the topic selection and logical development of writing. It was identified that these effects of before and after the debate and efficacy of the process are all significant according to the analysis on the effectiveness verification based on the survey of learners.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (3)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (21)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[journal] 강수진 / 2013 / A study on an integrated model of the argumentative writing and academic debate / 교양교육연구 / 한국교양교육학회 7(6) : 69~100

[journal] 강원화 / 2017 / The field cases of small-group-based debate instruction model / 사고와표현 / 한국사고와표현학회 10(2) : 37~86 / 10.19042/kstc.2017.10.2.37

[journal] 김일방 / 2019 / The Effect of Debate Classes on the Debate Capacity of Students / 제주대학교 교육과학연구 / 교육과학연구소 21(2) : 105~131

[journal] 나은미 / 2011 / Critical Review and Improvement Plan of Debate Educationin University －Targeting Debate Education as Liberal Education－ / 화법연구 / 한국화법학회 (19) : 241~269 / 10.18625/jsc.2011..19.241

[journal] 박재현 / 2011 / The Variables in Selecting the Type of Debate with the Consideration of its Educational Function / 화법연구 / 한국화법학회 (19) : 47~79 / 10.18625/jsc.2011..19.47

[book] 박한진 / 2013 / 디베이트와 논리적 사고 / 성숙한 삶

[journal] 이두원 / 2006 / An Exploration of the CEDA Debate Strategies : How to Win the Constructive Speech, Cross-Examination, and Rebuttal / 커뮤니케이션학 연구 / 한국커뮤니케이션학회 14(1) : 90~123

[journal] 이두원 / 2008 / An Exploration of the Debate Competence and Performance Evaluation Models in Academic Policy Debate / 커뮤니케이션학 연구 / 한국커뮤니케이션학회 16(3) : 83~103

[book] 이상원 / 2015 / 서울대 인문학 글쓰기 강의 / 황소자리

[journal] 이은주 / 2011 / The effectiveness of writing class along with ‘reading discussion’ －In the case of Duksung Women's University－ / 독서연구 / 한국독서학회 (26) : 501~516

[journal] 정희모 / 2013 / Direction and Views of College writing Research / 작문연구 / 한국작문학회 (18) : 9~33

[journal] 최규수 / 2015 / 대학에서 글쓰기 교육을 한다는 것, 그 돌아보기와 내다보기: 대학글쓰기 교육의 정체성 찾기에 대하여 / 이화어문논집 / 이화어문학회 36 : 29~49

[book] 최규수 / 2014 / 대학시절의 글쓰기 1(학술적 글쓰기와 친해지기 편) / 명지대학교 출판부

[book] 최은희 / 2014 / 독서디베이트 : 책 읽기의 혁명, 교육혁명 / 글누림

[book] 캐빈 리 / 2011 / 디베이트 / 한겨레에듀

[book] Bigg, John / 2007 / 대학교육의 서론은 도전 : 교육과정과 수업 혁신 / 경북대학교 출판부

[book] Crosswhite, James / 2001 / 이성의 수사학-글쓰기와 논증의 매력 / 고려대학교 출판부

[book] 조경숙 / 2013 / The Power of Reading / 르네상스

[book] Willams, Joseph M. / 2009 / 논증의 탄생-글쓰기의 새로운 전략 / 홍문관

[confproc] Jesen, S. / 1998 / Apples and Oranges, A Comparative Analysis of Adjudication in Parliamentary and CEDA/NDT Debate / Paper presented at the 84

[confproc] Lawson, H. L. / 1994 / A Comparative Analysis of Communicative Behavior in CEDA Lincoln-Douglas Debate and CEDA Team Debate / Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Central States Communication Association

이 논문은 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 작성되었습니다.

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status