The purpose of this study is to find out the significance and role of the national planning system according to the law of 'Framework Act on the National land' and 'National land planning and Utilization Act', and to clarify the problem of those law and planning system.
The process of this study is how to realize the connection and the fitness between the upper and lower plan, mainly its related provision and content of every statutory plan.
The problems of the statutory plan below the new Act('Framework Act on the National land’ and 'National land planning and Utilization Act‘) are as follows :
Firstly, it causes to the vagueness what is the subject between 'Urban Comprehensive Master Plan' and 'Urban Management Plan’, because of replacing 'City and County Comprehensive Plan‘ with 'Urban Plan’.
Secondly, it causes to the confusion with the role of the upper and lower plan, owing to a textual interpretation to complying with the guiding principle and the political direction of 'Province Comprehensive Plan‘ even 'Metropolitan City’. Thirdly, there is no the provision which is the authority to be established 'Urban Comprehensive Master Plan‘ by a provincial governor.
The suggestions are as follows :
Firstly, it must clearly clarify to 'City and Province Comprehensive Plan‘ not only named by 'Province Comprehensive Plan’, and to giving a definition of 'City and County Comprehensive Plan‘ as its lower system. Secondly, the provision in the new Act which is generally applicable to not divide 'Urban Plan‘ into 'Urban Comprehensive Master Plan’ and 'Urban Management Plan‘ must be definitely prescribed.
Thirdly, it must have a correct understanding of the status and authority of a provincial governor, and it also need to prescribe the authority distribution system for their authority to be clear.