A Study on the Claim Potential in Public Construction Works Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Kim, Sungil; 이형찬

We analyzed the claims' factors in the public construction projects. According to the previous studies, construction claims and disputes complexly result from various causes. As researchers would define the claim by operational definition, they presented factors of a construction claim differently. Considering all things, the causes of a construction claim result from so many factors; that is institutional conditions, the practice of construction contract, and so on. This study presents the results of a Structural Equation Model (SEM) for describing and quantifying the fundamental factors that affect a contract claim between owners and contractors in the public construction project. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis is to identify the factors that affect a construction project, and to construct a model to predict a construction claim in public construction projects. Data for the model development were collected using questionnaire surveys which had been undertaken of project managers or contractors working on public sector construction projects. This analysis developed a model and the factors of a construction claim in public works were modeled by using the SEM. Process and project issues play a role in predicting the likelihood of the construction claim in public works. When these variables can be measured through surrogate variables. It is rejected the null hypotheses that the capability of owners and contractors, the external characteristics of the conducted project are related to the potential of claims in a significant level. However, the physical characteristics and complexity of projects and contract management are related to contract claim potential. From these results, we conclude that the potential of contract claims in the Korean public works is influenced by the process issue rather than the people issue.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (3)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (20)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[journal] / 1999.2 / 품질경영 시스템의 모형개발과 공공 서비스부문의 적용에 대한 연구

[journal] / 2001.2 / AMOS구조방정식 모형분석 / SPSS 아카데미

[journal] / 2003.4 / 건설클레임의 예측모델에 관한 연구 / 대한건축학회 23(1)

[journal] / 1997 / 고전검사이론의 신뢰도 개념 재조명과 구조방정식 모형의 대안 17(1) : 150~155

[journal] / 1990 / 공변량구조분석

[journal] / 1998.10 / 국내건설사업의 클레임 동향분석 / 한국건설산업연구원

[journal] / 2000 / AMOS를 이용한 구조방정식 모형과 경로분석 / SPSS 아카데미

[journal] / 2003 / 건설공사 계약관리와 클레임

[journal] / 1998 / Predicting the Outcome of Construction Litigation Using Neural Networks 13 : 75~81

[journal] Bristow, D. J. / 1995 / The new CCDC 2 11 : 95~117

[journal] Cheung, S. O / 2000 / Factors affecting clients' project dispute resolution satisfaction in Hong Kong (18) : 281~294

[journal] / 1996 / The relationship between construction procurement strategies and construction contract disputes / University of Natal, Durban : 66~82

[journal] / 1995 / Are Contract Disputes Predictable? 12(14) : 365~363

[journal] / 19751994 / Introduction to Structural Equation Models 구조 방정식 모형의 이해 / Academic press

[journal] / 1997 / Conflict and dispute in Construction 12 : 513~518

[journal] / 1998 / Consequences of Construction Conflict: A Hong Kong Perspective : 66~74

[journal] / 2000 / Structural Equation Model of Construction Contract Dispute Potential : 268~277

[journal] / 2001 / Construction claims management: towards an agent-based approach : 185~197

[journal] / 1998 / Improving the management of claims on construction contracts: consultant's perspective 16(3) : 363~372

[journal] / 1995 / Dispute Prevention and Resolution : 8~9

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status