Inconvenience Costs from Reduction of Noise between Floors

Yoo, Seung-Hoon; JooSuk Lee

doi:10.15793/kspr.2008.58..011

With the increase of Apartment, the conflicts and complaints owing to the noise between floors has been increased and aggravated. For reducing the noise between floors, it is essential to analyze the inconvenience costs from reduction of noise between floors. This study attempts to assess the inconvenience costs from reduction of noise between floors by using contingent valuation method, especially the one and one half bound dichotomous choice spike model. This model has the benefit of higher efficiency in benefit estimates than the single bound dichotomous choice model and it reduced the potential response bias of double bound dichotomous choice model. According to estimating ways, annual mean willingness to pay per household for the economic benefits from reduction of noise between floors is 54,442 won.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (4)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (15)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[journal] 유승훈 / 2007 / Using One and One-half Bounded Dichotomous Choice Model to Measure the Economic Benefits of Urban Noise Reduction / 자원환경경제연구 / 한국환경경제학회 16(3) : 451~485

[book] 윤혜정 / 2003 / 주거와 주택 / 다락방

[journal] 이주석 / 2007 / Measuring the Economic Benefits of Water Quality Improvement of Nakdong-river / 경제연구 / 한국경제통상학회 25(2) : 111~129

[web] / 한국방송 / kbs.co.kr

[report] Arrow. K / 1993 / Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation / National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. U.S. Department of Commerce

[journal] Cameron T. A. / 1994 / Estimation using contingent valuation data from a ‘dichotomous choice with follow-up’ questionnaire / Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27 : 218~234

[report] Cooper. J / 1995 / Referendum contingent valuation: How many bounds are enough / USDA Economic Research Search service, Food and Consumer Economics Division

[other] Feitelson. R. H / 1996 / The impact of airport noise on willingness to pay for residence / Transportation Research D1 : 1~14

[journal] Hanemann. W. M. / 1984 / Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses / American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 : 332~341

[journal] Hanemann. M / 1991 / Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation / American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 : 1255~1263

[book] Hanemann. W. M / 1999 / The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data, In Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries / Oxford University Press

[journal] Krinsky. I. / 1986 / On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities / Review of Economics and Statistics 68 : 715~719

[journal] Kriström. B. / 1997 / Spike models in contingent valuation / American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 : 1013~1023

[book] Mitchell R. C. / 1989 / Using surveys to public goods : The contingent valuation method / Resources for the Future

[report] Navrud. S. / 2002 / The state of the art on economic evaluation of noise, Final report to the European Commission / Department of Economics and Social Science, Agriculture University of Norway

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status