A Study on the Validity of Administrative Field Agency of Central Government Focusing on Maintenance of Major Road and National River

Yoonseuk Woo

doi:10.15793/kspr.2013.76..010

This study tried to re-examine the relevance of management authority for major road and nation river, which have been regarded as representative areas to be transferred to local government, from more empirical perspective than theoretic and normative viewpoint. As a result, main features of major road and national river are revealed as semi-pure public goods, network type, non-consistence with local administration jurisdiction and thus it is suggested that more unified management is necessary. According to this analysis, a question arises whether it is suitable to transfer management authority from administrative field agency of central government to local government who is in charge of only in limited jurisdictional area instead of whole area of influence. The reason of continual failure of transferring the management authority to local government may be attributed to such inappropriateness rather than simple lack of driving force or other environmental factors. Pushing ahead such transferring policy regardless of management capacity or willingness of local government as seeing it as a given desirable goal is another problem to be re-examined. In future, we need to examine the particular features of policy targets in detail before making a decision of transferring the management authority.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)
REFERENCES (41)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[report] 감사원 / 2007 / 감사결과 처분요구서: 하천관리 및 하천정비사업 추진실태

[other] 국토해양부 / 2010 / 도로보수현황

[other] 국토해양부 / 2011 / 한국하천일람

[book] 국토해양부 / 2012 / 2011년 도로업무편람

[confproc] 금창호 / 2003 / 특별지방행정기관 정비 어떻게 할 것인가 / 서울대학교 행정대학원 제33회 지식&정책 포럼 자료집 / 서울대학교

[confproc] 김성배 / 2006 / 특별지방행정기관의 기능조정방안: 국도하천, 해양수산, 환경 및 산림분야의 경우 / 작은 정부와 지방분권 실현을 위한 특별지방행정기관 지방이관 추진 공청회 / 국회도서관

[journal] 김성배 / 2006 / An Optimal Governance Model of Public Service Delivery: with Special Referenceto the Functional Readjustment of Field Administrative Offices / 한국지방자치학회보 / 한국지방자치학회 18(2) : 27~48

[journal] 김영수 / 2002 / Coordinating Field Office of Central Government / 지방정부연구 / 한국지방정부학회 6(4) : 231~249

[journal] 김익식 / 2002 / 특별지방행정기관의 의의와 역할 / 지방행정 51(589) : 16~23

[confproc] 소진광 / 2002 / 특별지방행정기관과 지방자치단체 간의 관계 / 한국지방자치학회 2002년도 동계학술대회 발표논문집 : 337~360

[journal] 소진광 / 2005 / 지방분권과 특별지방행정기관 정비 / 지방자치 (202) : 27~32

[journal] 안경섭 / 2009 / An Empirical Study field administration office of local transfer - Focus on the Office of Forestry / 한국지방자치학회보 / 한국지방자치학회 21(2) : 101~122

[book] 양지청 / 1994 / 사회간접자본론: 이론과 정책 / 서울프레스

[other] 연합뉴스 / 2011 / 부산-경남, 이번엔 ‘먹는 물’ 놓고 갈등 예고 / 중앙일보

[journal] 오재일 / 2008 / A Study on Restructuring of Special Regional Administrative Agencies / 한국거버넌스학회보 / 한국거버넌스학회 15(1) : 1~33

[book] 정용덕 / 2004 / 세계화와 국가정책 / 박영사

[journal] 이시철 / 2007 / Major Issues and Directions in the Administrative Devolution of the Central Government's Field Agencies in Korea / 지방정부연구 / 한국지방정부학회 11(2) : 25~46

[report] 이은재 / 1989 / 지방행정기관과 특별지방행정기관 간의 역할재분담에 관한 연구 / 한국지방행정연구원

[journal] 이장희 / 2003 / 특별지방행정기관의 기능 재조정을 위한 대안 모색 / 지역정책연구 14(1) : 35~51

[journal] 이환범 / 2011 / Restructuring Strategies of Special Local Administrative Agencies in Korea:A Comparison of Functions between Special Local Administrative Agencies and Local Governments / 한국지방자치학회보 / 한국지방자치학회 23(3) : 127~156

[report] 정부혁신지방분권위원회 / 2005 / 특별지방행정기관 기능조정안 / 정부혁신지방분권위원회

[journal] 조석준 / 1992 / 지자제실시의 실효성 제고를 위한 지방행정제도의 개선방안 / 행정논총 30(1) : 30~50

[book] 진재구 / 1998 / 특별지방행정기관과 지방자치단체 간의 중복기능 조정방안, In 공공부문 혁신을 위한 연구(III) / 한국조세연구원 : 20~211

[journal] 차미숙 / 2003 / 지역발전을 위한 특별지방행정기관의 연계˙조정방향 / 국토 : 100~113

[report] 한국행정연구원 / 2002 / 광역자치단체와 특별지방행정기관 간 기능조정방안 / 한국행정연구원

[book] 행정안전부 / 2012 / 2011 행정안전백서 / 행정안전부

[book] 홍성웅 / 2005 / 사회간접자본의 경제학 / 박영사

[journal] Alexander, A. / 1991 / Managing Fragmentation: Democracy, Accountability and the Future of Local Government / Local Government Studies 17(6) : 63~76

[journal] Christensen, J. / 2001 / The Political Benefits of Corporatization and Privatization / Journal of Public Policy 21(3) : 283~309

[book] Department for Transport / 2011 / Transport Statistics Great Britain / HMSO

[book] Ford, R. / 1996 / Alternative Service Delivery: Sharing Governance in Canada / IPAC

[book] Kolderie, T / 1983 / Rethinking Public Service Delivery, In The Entrepreneur in Local Government / International City Management Association

[book] Mellors, C. / 1987 / Local Government in the Community / ICSA Publising Ltd

[journal] Oum, T. / 2006 / Privatization, Corporatization, Owenrship Forms and Their Effects on the Performance of the World’s Major Airports / Journal of Air Transport Management 12 : 109~121

[book] Savas, E. S. / 1989 / Privatizing the Public Sector / Seven Bridges Press

[journal] Shirley, M. / 1999 / Bureaucrats in Business: The Role of Privatization vs. Corporatization in State-Owned Enterprise Reform / World Development 27(1) : 115~136

[journal] Smith, A. / 2010 / Exploring the Effects of Passenger Rail Franchising in Britain: Evidence from the First Two Rounds of Franchising / Research in Transport Economics 29 : 72~79

[journal] Tiebout, C. / 1956 / A Pure Theory of Local Government Expenditure / Journal of Political Economy 64 : 416~424

[book] Tullock, G. / 1994 / The New Federalist / The Fraser Institute

[book] Tullock, G. / 2000 / Government: Whose Obedient Servant? / The Institute of Economic Affairs

[journal] Villalonga, B. / 2000 / Privatization and Efficiency: Differentiating Ownership Effects from Political, Organizational, and Dynamic Effects / Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 42 : 43~74

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status