Artificial Life System Art: Could It Be an Engine for Progress of Art?
-
In this paper, the author reviews the “end of art” thesis of Arthur Danto, which he proposed to explain the extreme pluralism of art world since 1960s. The thesis basically means that all kinds of new things have been explored in the name of art, and no new kinds of art that are philosophically surprising and significant will emerge, though art making will continue and some new works of art will appear. This conclusion, however, is derived from Danto’s peculiar notion of development or narrative of art in which obtaining the self-definition or the self-consciousness is the most important task of art. The author, however, suggests, together with Carroll, that we need to consider a more comprehensive task of art including the self-definition. Especially, the author argues that the self-definition be considered as a means of resolving the crisis in art, and of further development as in other fields such as science and mathematics. With this more comprehensive perspective, the author considers whether the computer art has a potential to develop a new direction of art in a way more than one of many variations. From the very beginning, one of the strong points of computer has been the ability to construct cybernetic systems which can receive feedback from the environment and produce responses. That capability has been used to create system-oriented dynamic art forms that can interacts with people. The recent incarnation of this trend is artificial life art, which tries to implement the mechanism of natural life with computer and electronic technology. Danto does not discuss the system-based art or artificial life art, but seems to assume that they would be is just one of many variations in the radical pluralism of contemporary art. But the author argues that “system-based art”, especially its recent offspring “artificial life art”, is fundamentally different from traditional “object-based art”. and is more than a variation from object-based art. Furthurmore, the author suggests that this system-based art paradigm can provide a new direction for the development of art. The theoretical justification for this claim comes partly from Jack Burnham’s “System Esthetics”, which has two key insights: (1) “We are now in transition from an object-oriented to a systems-oriented culture. Here change emanates, not from things, but from the way things are done.” (2) “The specific function of modern didactic art has been to show that art does not reside in material entities, but in relations between people, and between people and the components of their environment.” This new project of art has not yet been exhausted, but seems to have much to be explored, and the exploration needs the creative use of computer technology, which is ever developing. This direction will a significant factor in the development of art, because the system building capability meshes well with the system-oriented nature of contemporary art and this capability is ever developing.
-
[book] Bentely, P. J / 2002 / Creative Evolutionary Systems / London: Academic Press
[journal] Binkley / 1998 / Autonomous Creations: Birthing Intelligent Agents / in: Leonardo 31 (5) : 333~336
[book] Brooks / 1991 / Intelligence Without Reason(in: IJCAI) / in:IJCAI : 569~595
[journal] Brooks / 1991 / Intelligence without Representation / in: Artificial Intelligence 47 : 139~159
[book] Burnham / 1967 / Beyond Modern Sculpture / New York: George Braziller
[journal] Burnham / 1968 / Systems Esthetics / in: Artforum 7 (1) : 30~35
[book] Burnham / 1970 / The Aesthetics of Intelligent Systems(in: On the Future of Art) / New York: Viking Press(www.washington.edu/dxarts.) : 95~122
[book] Burnham / 1974 / Great Western Salt Works: Essays on the Meaning of Post-Formalist Art / New York: George Braziller
[book] Burnham / 1980 / Art and Technology: The Panacea that Failed(in: The Myths of Information: Technology and Postindustrial Culture) / Madision: Coda Press
[journal] Carrier / 1988 / in: HIstory and Theory / 1-16 / HIstory and Theory 37 (4) : 1~16
[journal] Carroll / 1988 / The End of Art / in: History and Theory / History and Theory 37 (4) : 17~19
[book] Carroll / 1997 / Danto, Art, and History”, in: The End of Art and Beyond: Essays after Danto, Arto Haapala, Jerrold Levinson, and Veikko Rantala(eds.) / Amherst: Humanity Books : 30~45
[journal] Carroll / 1997 / Danto’s New Definition of Art and The Problem of Art Theories / in: British Journal of Aesthetics / in: British Journal of Aesthetics 37 (4) : 386~392
[journal] Catts / 2002 / Growing Semi-Living Sculptures: The Tissue Culture & Art Project / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 35 (4) : 365~370
[journal] Clauser, H. R. / 1988 / Towards a Dynamic, Generative Computer Art / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 21 (2) : 115~22
[journal] Danto / 1964 / The Artworld / in: The Journal of Philosophy 61 : 571~584
[book] Danto / 1981 / The Transfiguration of the Commonplace, Cambridge / Harvard Univ. Press
[book] Danto / 1986 / The End of Art(in: The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art) / New York: Columbia University Press : 81~115
[book] Danto / 1987 / Approaching the End of Art(in: The State of the Art) / New York: Prentice Hall : 202~218
[book] Danto / 1992 / Beyond the Brillo Box / LA: Universtiy of California Press
[book] Danto / 1997 / After the End of Art: Comtemporary Art and the Pale of History / Princeton: Princeton University Press
[journal] Danto / 1998 / The End of Art: A Philosophical Defense(in: History and Theory) / 127-143 37 (4) : 127~143
[book] Danto / 2007 / Response to Hans Belting’s article ‘At the Doom of Modernism: Art and Art Theory in Competition’ / in: Action, Art, History: Engagements with Danto : 112~129
[book] Danto / 2007 / For the Birds/Against the Birds( in: Action,Art, History, Herwitz and Kelly(eds.), ) / New York: Columbia University Press : 43~81
[journal] Dietrich, F. / 1986 / Visual Intelligence: The First Decade of Computer Art (1965- 1975)” / in: Leonardo 19 (2) : 159~169
[web] Galanter / What is Generative Art? Complex Theory as a Context for Art Theory(in: International Conference on Generative Art( 2003)) / http://www.philipgalanter.com/downloads/ga2003_paper.pdf.
[journal] Gessert, G. / 1993 / Notes on Genetic Art / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 26 (3) : 205~211
[book] Grau / 2004 / Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion / Cambridge: MIT Press
[journal] Greenfield, G. R. / 2000 / Evolving Expressions and Art by Choice / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 33 (2) : 93~99
[journal] Greenfield / 2002 / Simulated Aesthetics and Evolving Artworks: A Coevolutionary Approach / in: Leonardo 35 (3) : 283~289
[journal] Haggerty, M. / 1992 / Robotic Painting: Art Creating Art / in: IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications(July 1992) : 8~10
[journal] Hilmer / 1988 / Being Hegelian After Dant / History and Theory / History and Theory 37 (4) : 71~86
[journal] Janssen / 2006 / A generative evolutionary design method / in: Digital Creativity / Digital Creativity 17 (1) : 49~63
[journal] Klein, Y. A. / 1998 / Living Sculpture: The Art and Science of Creating Robotic Life / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 31 (5) : 393~396
[book] Kuhn,T / 1970 / The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago / The University of Chicago Press
[web] Manovich, Lev. / Avant-garde as Software / http://www.uoc.edu/artnodes/eng/art/manovich1002/manovich1002.html
[web] Manovich, Lev. / The Death of Computer Art / http://www.thenetnet.com/schmeb/schmeb12.html
[journal] Mignonneau / 2001 / Creating Artificial Life for Interactive Art and Entertainment / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 34 (4) : 303~307
[book] Popper / 1993 / Art of the Electronic Age / London: Thames and Hudson
[book] Popper / 2007 / From Technological to Virtual Art / Cambridge: MIT Press
[book] Rantala / 1997 / Theoreticity in Art(in: The End of Art and Beyond: Essays after Danto) / Amherst: Humanity Books : 110~121
[journal] Ray / 2001 / Aesthetically Evolved Virtual Pets / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 34 (4) : 313~316
[book] Rosebush, J. / 1989 / The Proceduralist Manifesto / in: Leonardo supplemental Issue(1989) : 55~56
[book] Roth, M. / 1978 / Harold Cohen on Art & the Machinie / in: Art in America : 106~110
[journal] Scha / 1991 / Artificial Art / in: Zeezucht / (English translation has appeared in Scha’s homepage)//www.iaaa.nl/rs/cv.html. 4 : 29~34
[book] Skrebowski / 2007 / All Systems Go: Recovering Jack Burnham’s ‘Systems Aesthetics / in: Tate’s Online Research Journal, Issue 5(http://www.tate.org.uk/research/tateresearch/tatepapers/06spring/skrebowski.htm)
[journal] Sommerer, C. / 1999 / Art as a Living System: Interactive ComputerArtworks / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 32 (3) : 165~173
[journal] Tenhaaf / 1998 / As Art Is Lifelike: Evolution, Art, and the Readymade / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 31 (5)
[journal] Tomasula / 2002 / Genetic Art and the Aesthetics of Biology / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 35 (2) : 137~144
[journal] Verostko, R. / 1990 / Epigenetic Painting: Software as Genotype / in: Leonardo / Leonardo 23 (1) : 17~23
[journal] Youngs, Amy M. / 2000 / The Fine Art of Creating Life / 377-380 / in: Leonardo 33 (5) : 377~380
[book] Whitelaw / 2004 / Meta Creation: Art and Artificial Life / MIT Press
-
166
Viewed
Print this page
Search PDF