Proper roles and responsibilities of the government are important in preparing for and overcoming social risk which has diversified and deepened. The risk response policy or strategy of the government needs to focus on expanding and funding the social security network in Korea which has not completed social welfare system fully. This study evaluates social risk response policies which are implemented against the economic crisis in 2008, and tries to provide policy suggestions for the establishment of strategies against social risk through the analysis of policy priorities. After examining the existing social security network, we can figure out policy priorities to complement and expand the social security network through the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Our results indicate that job creation is the most necessary strategy among six different risk response policy types, and that the priorities to be considered for the establishment of better risk response policies are; assistance for business startups, assistance for childcare, assistance for higher education, assistance for job training, and assistance for lower income citizens.
@article{ART001474357}, author={이곤수 and Kim, Byung-kyu}, title={Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP}, journal={Korean Society and Public Administration}, issn={1225-8652}, year={2010}, volume={21}, number={2}, pages={193-214}
TY - JOUR AU - 이곤수 AU - Kim, Byung-kyu TI - Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP JO - Korean Society and Public Administration PY - 2010 VL - 21 IS - 2 PB - Seoul Association For Public Administration SP - 193 EP - 214 SN - 1225-8652 AB - Proper roles and responsibilities of the government are important in preparing for and overcoming social risk which has diversified and deepened. The risk response policy or strategy of the government needs to focus on expanding and funding the social security network in Korea which has not completed social welfare system fully. This study evaluates social risk response policies which are implemented against the economic crisis in 2008, and tries to provide policy suggestions for the establishment of strategies against social risk through the analysis of policy priorities. After examining the existing social security network, we can figure out policy priorities to complement and expand the social security network through the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Our results indicate that job creation is the most necessary strategy among six different risk response policy types, and that the priorities to be considered for the establishment of better risk response policies are; assistance for business startups, assistance for childcare, assistance for higher education, assistance for job training, and assistance for lower income citizens. KW - Social Risk;Risk Response Policy;AHP DO - UR - ER -
이곤수 and Kim, Byung-kyu. (2010). Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP. Korean Society and Public Administration, 21(2), 193-214.
이곤수 and Kim, Byung-kyu. 2010, "Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP", Korean Society and Public Administration, vol.21, no.2 pp.193-214.
이곤수, Kim, Byung-kyu "Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP" Korean Society and Public Administration 21.2 pp.193-214 (2010) : 193.
이곤수, Kim, Byung-kyu. Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP. 2010; 21(2), 193-214.
이곤수 and Kim, Byung-kyu. "Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP" Korean Society and Public Administration 21, no.2 (2010) : 193-214.
이곤수; Kim, Byung-kyu. Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP. Korean Society and Public Administration, 21(2), 193-214.
이곤수; Kim, Byung-kyu. Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP. Korean Society and Public Administration. 2010; 21(2) 193-214.
이곤수, Kim, Byung-kyu. Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP. 2010; 21(2), 193-214.
이곤수 and Kim, Byung-kyu. "Social Risk and Evaluation of Risk Response Policies: Analysis of Relative Significance Using AHP" Korean Society and Public Administration 21, no.2 (2010) : 193-214.