Journal of Regulation Studies 2021 KCI Impact Factor : 1.61
A study on the identification of policy demand for project-type regulatory sandbox through the analysis of perception differences in stakeholders
ABSTRACT
열림/닫힘 버튼KEYWORDS
열림/닫힘 버튼95 Viewed
29 Downloaded
KCI Citation Counts (2)
열림/닫힘 버튼[journal]
김성아
/ 2021
/
Analyzing Meanings of ‘Hot Place’ Using Semantic Network Analysis - Changes of Keyword Characteristics in 2013 and 2019 -
/ 국토지리학회지
/ 국토지리학회
55(1)
: 1~13
[book] 박규홍 / 2019 / 한국법제연구원 전문가칼럼 : 1~5
[journal]
박종준
/ 2020
/
A Brief Study on the Legal System of Korean Regulatory Sandbox
/ 법조
/ 법조협회
69(3)
: 193~232
/ 10.17007/klaj.2020.69.3.006
[journal] 배영임 / 2019 / 규제 샌드박스 성공적 안착을 위한 제언 / 이슈 & 진단 / 경기연구원 : 1~27
[journal] 배응환 / 2001 / 환경변화, 제도변화 그리고 정책변화: 신제도주의 접근방법을 중심으로 / 행정논총 39(2) : 103~139
[journal]
설선미
/ 2021
/
Tweeter as the Rising Platform for Policy Discourse: Analysis of the Issues of the 21st General Election
/ 정책분석평가학회보
/ 한국정책분석평가학회
31(1)
: 1~21
/ 10.23036/kapae.2021.31.1.001
[journal]
신가희
/ 2015
/
A Study on the Political Acceptability of Preliminary Feasibility Studies: The Analysis of the Minutes of the Budget and Accounting Committee
/ 한국정책학회보
/ 한국정책학회
24(2)
: 527~264
[journal] 염재호 / 1994 / 국가정책과 신제도주의 / 사회비평 11 : 10~33
[book] 이광호 / 2020 / 기술규제 개혁을 위한 의제설정 연구사업(4차년도) / 과학기술정책연구원 : 1~384
[journal] 이명석 / 2000 / 제도변화와 집합적 행동: 게임이론적 접근 / 사회과학 39(1) : 153~182
[journal] 이민창 / 2002 / 합리적 선택 제도주의의 정책학적 함의: 그린벨트와 영월댐 사례를 중심으로 / 한국사회와 행정연구 13(1) : 81~102
[book] 이수일 / 2018 / 신산업 촉진을 위한 규제개혁과제와 사례연구 / 경제·인문사회연구회 : 1~613
[journal] 최해옥 / 2017 / 규제 샌드박스 (Regulatory Sandbox) 정책 동향 및 시사점 / 동향과 이슈 / 과학기술정책연구원 (33) : 1~20
[book] 최해옥 / 2021 / 규제 샌드박스 제도의 마이크로 작동기제 주요 쟁점 및 대응방안 / 과학기술정책연구원 : 1~49
[journal]
한무명초
/ 2017
/
Analysis of News Regarding New Southeastern Airport Using Text Mining Techniques
/ 스마트미디어저널
/ (사)한국스마트미디어학회
6(1)
: 47~53
[journal]
황지은
/ 2016
/
Introduction Process of the Tobacco Graphic Health Warning Law in Korea: Analysis on the National Assembly Minutes
/ 보건행정학회지
/ 한국보건행정학회
26(4)
: 279~288
[journal] Allen, H.J / 2019 / Regulatory sandboxes / Geo. Wash. Law Rev 87 : 579~645
[journal] Brown, S.R / 1996 / Q methodology and qualitative research / Qualit. Health Res 6(4) : 561~567 / 10.1177/104973239600600408
[book] Chen, C. C / 2020 / Regulating FinTech in Asia: Global Context, Local Perspectives
[journal] Davis, C.H / 2011 / methodology in audience research: Bridging the qualitative/quantitative ‘divide / Participations 8(2) : 559~593
[journal] Di Castri, S / 2018 / Going beyond regulatory sandboxes to enable FinTech innovation in emerging markets / 10.2139/ssrn.3059309
[journal] Doerfel, M.L / 1999 / A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association / Hum. Commun. Res 25(4) : 589~603
[web] Financial Conduct Authority / 2017 / egulatory sandbox lessons learned report / ttps://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research-and-data/regulatory-sandbox-lessonslearned-report.pdf
[web] Financial Conduct Authority / 2016 / regulatory Sandbox / https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/regulatory-sandbox.pdf
[journal] Goo, J. J / 2020 / The impact of the regulatory sandbox on the fintech industry, with a discussion on the relation between regulatory sandboxes and open innovation / J. Open Innov 6(2) : 1~18 / 10.3390/joitmc6020043
[journal] J.H Lee / 2019 / Analyzing local opposition to biosphere reserve creation through semantic network analysis: the case of Baekdu mountain range / Korea, land use policy, 82 : 61~92
[book] Jenik, I / 2017 / Regulatory Sandboxes and Financial Inclusion / CGAP
[journal] Kataoka, S / 2019 / Japan’s new policy for testing innovative propositions for growth with government: The regulatory sandbox. Bank / Fin. Law Rev 35(1) : 187~196
[confproc] Kohout, A / 2012 / resented at the 15th International Symposium / Presented at the 15th International Symposium / Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center
[journal] Luhn, H.P / 1958 / A business intelligence system / Ibm J. Res. Dev 2(4) : 314~319
[journal] Moseley, J / 2020 / Regulatory and health technology assessment advice on postlicensing and postlaunch evidence generation is a foundation for lifecycle data collection for medicines / British J. Clin. Pharm 86(6) : 1034~1051 / 10.1111/bcp.14279
[book] North, D / 1990 / Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance / Cambridge University Press
[journal] Piri, M.M / 2018 / The changing landscapes of FinTech and RegTech: Why the United States should create a federal regulatory sandbox / Bus. Fin. Law Rev 2 : 233~
[journal] Prajapati, V / 2013 / Product lifecycle management through patents and regulatory strategies / J. Med. Mark 13(3) : 171~180 / 10.1177/1745790413497388
[journal] Watts, S / 2005 / Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation / Qual. Res. Psych 2(1) : 67~91
[journal] Zetzsche, D. A / 2017 / Regulating a revolution: From regulatory sandboxes to smart regulation / SSRN Electr. J / 10.2139/ssrn.3018534