A study on the identification of policy demand for project-type regulatory sandbox through the analysis of perception differences in stakeholders

HaeOk CHOI; Kwangho Lee

doi:10.22954/ksrs.2021.30.1.004

Since the existing regulatory improvement mainly aims to amend laws or to reorganize governance, it often fails to reflect the perceptions of the stakeholder’s, involved in the regulatory improvement process. Therefore, this study is meaningful in that it provided policy implications by identifying the stakeholder’s participating in the regulatory sandbox in order to overcome the limitations of existing studies. First, in the project-type regulatory sandbox, the issues related to evaluation and certification will be the most important factor for law revisions. Second, it is necessary to clearly set the differences between the place-based empirical issues in the project-type and regional-limited regulatory sandbox. Third, in the case of new technology, it is difficult to purchase insurance due to the limitations of insurance. So it need to use deduction system for implementation. Fourth, in the safety verification-related examination procedure, the examination procedure should be simplified. This study suggests that there is a need for a support system that identifies the perception differences of stakeholder’s participating in the regulatory sandbox.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (2)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (36)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[journal] 김성아 / 2021 / Analyzing Meanings of ‘Hot Place’ Using Semantic Network Analysis - Changes of Keyword Characteristics in 2013 and 2019 - / 국토지리학회지 / 국토지리학회 55(1) : 1~13

[book] 박규홍 / 2019 / 한국법제연구원 전문가칼럼 : 1~5

[journal] 박종준 / 2020 / A Brief Study on the Legal System of Korean Regulatory Sandbox / 법조 / 법조협회 69(3) : 193~232 / 10.17007/klaj.2020.69.3.006

[journal] 배영임 / 2019 / 규제 샌드박스 성공적 안착을 위한 제언 / 이슈 & 진단 / 경기연구원 : 1~27

[journal] 배응환 / 2001 / 환경변화, 제도변화 그리고 정책변화: 신제도주의 접근방법을 중심으로 / 행정논총 39(2) : 103~139

[journal] 설선미 / 2021 / Tweeter as the Rising Platform for Policy Discourse: Analysis of the Issues of the 21st General Election / 정책분석평가학회보 / 한국정책분석평가학회 31(1) : 1~21 / 10.23036/kapae.2021.31.1.001

[journal] 신가희 / 2015 / A Study on the Political Acceptability of Preliminary Feasibility Studies: The Analysis of the Minutes of the Budget and Accounting Committee / 한국정책학회보 / 한국정책학회 24(2) : 527~264

[journal] 염재호 / 1994 / 국가정책과 신제도주의 / 사회비평 11 : 10~33

[book] 이광호 / 2020 / 기술규제 개혁을 위한 의제설정 연구사업(4차년도) / 과학기술정책연구원 : 1~384

[journal] 이명석 / 2000 / 제도변화와 집합적 행동: 게임이론적 접근 / 사회과학 39(1) : 153~182

[journal] 이민창 / 2002 / 합리적 선택 제도주의의 정책학적 함의: 그린벨트와 영월댐 사례를 중심으로 / 한국사회와 행정연구 13(1) : 81~102

[book] 이수일 / 2018 / 신산업 촉진을 위한 규제개혁과제와 사례연구 / 경제·인문사회연구회 : 1~613

[journal] 최해옥 / 2017 / 규제 샌드박스 (Regulatory Sandbox) 정책 동향 및 시사점 / 동향과 이슈 / 과학기술정책연구원 (33) : 1~20

[book] 최해옥 / 2021 / 규제 샌드박스 제도의 마이크로 작동기제 주요 쟁점 및 대응방안 / 과학기술정책연구원 : 1~49

[journal] 한무명초 / 2017 / Analysis of News Regarding New Southeastern Airport Using Text Mining Techniques / 스마트미디어저널 / (사)한국스마트미디어학회 6(1) : 47~53

[journal] 황지은 / 2016 / Introduction Process of the Tobacco Graphic Health Warning Law in Korea: Analysis on the National Assembly Minutes / 보건행정학회지 / 한국보건행정학회 26(4) : 279~288

[journal] Allen, H.J / 2019 / Regulatory sandboxes / Geo. Wash. Law Rev 87 : 579~645

[journal] Brown, S.R / 1996 / Q methodology and qualitative research / Qualit. Health Res 6(4) : 561~567 / 10.1177/104973239600600408

[book] Chen, C. C / 2020 / Regulating FinTech in Asia: Global Context, Local Perspectives

[journal] Davis, C.H / 2011 / methodology in audience research: Bridging the qualitative/quantitative ‘divide / Participations 8(2) : 559~593

[journal] Di Castri, S / 2018 / Going beyond regulatory sandboxes to enable FinTech innovation in emerging markets / 10.2139/ssrn.3059309

[journal] Doerfel, M.L / 1999 / A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association / Hum. Commun. Res 25(4) : 589~603

[web] Financial Conduct Authority / 2017 / egulatory sandbox lessons learned report / ttps://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research-and-data/regulatory-sandbox-lessonslearned-report.pdf

[web] Financial Conduct Authority / 2016 / regulatory Sandbox / https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/regulatory-sandbox.pdf

[journal] Goo, J. J / 2020 / The impact of the regulatory sandbox on the fintech industry, with a discussion on the relation between regulatory sandboxes and open innovation / J. Open Innov 6(2) : 1~18 / 10.3390/joitmc6020043

[journal] J.H Lee / 2019 / Analyzing local opposition to biosphere reserve creation through semantic network analysis: the case of Baekdu mountain range / Korea, land use policy, 82 : 61~92

[book] Jenik, I / 2017 / Regulatory Sandboxes and Financial Inclusion / CGAP

[journal] Kataoka, S / 2019 / Japan’s new policy for testing innovative propositions for growth with government: The regulatory sandbox. Bank / Fin. Law Rev 35(1) : 187~196

[confproc] Kohout, A / 2012 / resented at the 15th International Symposium / Presented at the 15th International Symposium / Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center

[journal] Luhn, H.P / 1958 / A business intelligence system / Ibm J. Res. Dev 2(4) : 314~319

[journal] Moseley, J / 2020 / Regulatory and health technology assessment advice on postlicensing and postlaunch evidence generation is a foundation for lifecycle data collection for medicines / British J. Clin. Pharm 86(6) : 1034~1051 / 10.1111/bcp.14279

[book] North, D / 1990 / Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance / Cambridge University Press

[journal] Piri, M.M / 2018 / The changing landscapes of FinTech and RegTech: Why the United States should create a federal regulatory sandbox / Bus. Fin. Law Rev 2 : 233~

[journal] Prajapati, V / 2013 / Product lifecycle management through patents and regulatory strategies / J. Med. Mark 13(3) : 171~180 / 10.1177/1745790413497388

[journal] Watts, S / 2005 / Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation / Qual. Res. Psych 2(1) : 67~91

[journal] Zetzsche, D. A / 2017 / Regulating a revolution: From regulatory sandboxes to smart regulation / SSRN Electr. J / 10.2139/ssrn.3018534

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status