Transforming the Stunted UNESCO-Korea Development Partnership? The Case of UNESCO Bangkok’s Strategic Framework for the Korea Funds-in-Trust

Taekyoon Kim; Bo Kyung Kim

This study sets out to analyze a delicate and uncomfortable relationship between UNESCO Bangkok Office and the Korean partner agencies in carrying out the Korea Funds-in- Trust (KFIT) for one decade (2007 – 2016). The development partnership between UNESCO and Korean partners has been problematized due to lack of not only coordination mechanisms from the initial stage to the final reporting of KFIT projects but also lack of intention of both parties to understand partner’s internal processes of policy transfers. The upshot of such a low degree of trust between donor and implementer of trust funds is expected to spawn the accountability deficits. In responding to this challenging situation, the study proposes a new strategic framework for the KFIT, which is equipped with its key findings and the restoration of coordination mechanisms based upon them.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)
REFERENCES (17)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[book] Addison, T. / 2004 / Donor funding of multilateral aid agencies: Determining factors and revealed burden sharing / UNU-WIDER

[book] Asian Development Bank / 2015 / Trust funds and fiscal risks in the North Pacific: Analysis of trust fund rules and sustainability in the Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia / Asian Development Bank

[journal] Barakat, S. / 2009 / The failed promise of multi-donor trust fund: Aid financing as an impediment to effective state-building in post-conflict contexts / Policy Studies 30(2) : 107~126

[book] Barakat, S. / 2012 / What is the track record of multi-donor trust funds in improving aid effectiveness? An assessment of the available evidence / EPPI-Centre, University of London

[book] Brinkerhoff, J. M. / 2002 / Partnership for international development: Rhetoric or results? / Lynne Rienner Publishers

[journal] Eichenauer, V. Z. / 2018 / politics of special purpose trust funds / Economics & Politics 30(2) : 211~255

[journal] Eichenauer, V. Z. / 2017 / What determines earmarked funding to international development organizations? Evidence from the new multi-bi aid dataset / Review of International Organizations 12(2) : 171~197

[journal] 김태균 / 2017 / On Global Accountability: A Theoretical Revisit to Accountability Mechanisms for Development Partnerships / Journal of Asian Sociology / 사회발전연구소 46(2) : 317~339 / 10.21588/dns.2017.46.2.006

[journal] Michaelowa, K. / 2016 / Multi-bi aid in European development assistance: The role of capacity constraints and member state politics / Development Policy Review 35(4) : 513~530

[journal] Milner, H. V. / 2013 / The choice for multilateralism: Foreign aid and American foreign policy / Review of International Organizations 8(3) : 313~341

[book] National Assembly Budget Office / 2019 / Public finance of Korea 2019 / National Assembly Budget Office

[book] Reinsberg, B. / 2016 / The fragmentation of aid: Concepts, measurements and implications for development cooperation / Palgrave Macmillan : 185~198

[book] Reinsberg, B. / 2015 / Handbook on the Economics of Foreign Aid / Edward Elgar : 527~554

[report] Tortora, P. / 2014 / Making earmarked funding more effective: Current practices and a way forward / OECD

[report] UNESCO / 2013 / A practical guide to UNESCO’s extrabudgetary activities / UNESCO

[report] UNESCO / 2013 / The Asia and Pacific regional bureau’s education support strategy, 2014-2021 / UNESCO Bangkok Office

[report] UNESCO / 2014 / UNESCO’s medium-term strategy for 2014-2021 (document 37 C/4) / UNESCO

이 논문은 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 작성되었습니다.

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status