현대중국어의 상황상 연구

Lee, Eunsoo

doi:10.26585/chlab.2009..26.001

In Slavic languages, viewpoint aspect is represented by the contrast between perfective and imperfective aspects, and perfective aspect expresses 'totality'. There have been attempts to account for aspects in other languages, and it is often misunderstood that perfective aspect in those languages means 'totality'. Chinese perfective marker 'Le' is also claimed to express 'totality'. However, just as the aspectual meaning in Korean excludes 'totality', so does the aspectual meaning in Chinese. That is, the form and meaning of viewpoint aspect differ from language to language. It is well-known that viewpoint aspect differs from language to language, but it is generally assumed that situation aspect is similar in every language. In fact, Smith(1991) classified situation aspect into five types, applying them to several languages. However, considering that classification of situation aspect is based on viewpoint aspect, I claim that if the latter differs from language to language, then the former will, too. Therefore, it is necessary to study viewpoint aspect before situation aspect. First of all, the perfective aspect 'Le' does not represent 'totality', but it represents that a situational boundary (a initial boundary or a terminal boundary) existed in the relative past. Also 'Zai' represents the active continuation of situation and 'Zhe' expresses the static situation. Besides, 'Guo' is not considered in this paper because it is not important in the classification of situation aspect. Considering semantic features on which classification of situation is based, I review previous studies on situation aspect and propose a new situation aspect in Chinese. I classify the situation aspect into four types: state, activity, result and complex change. 'Activity' includes 'semelfactive'. 'Accomplishment' is excluded from consideration, whereas 'complex change' is added to the list.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (8)
열림/닫힘 버튼
REFERENCES (19)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2021년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[book] 김성화 / 2003 / 국어의 상 연구 / 한신문화사

[journal] 이은수 / 2004 / The Temporal Meaning of the Mandarin Aspect Marker ‘LE’ / 중국언어연구 / 한국중국언어학회 (19) : 251~272

[journal] 이은수 / 2008 / 중국어 상황상과 了, 부정사 / 중국어문논역총간 / 중국어문논역학회 (23) : 295~315

[journal] 郭銳 / 1993 / 漢語動詞的過程結構 / 中國語文

[book] 鄧守信 / 1986 / 漢語動詞的時間結構 in: 一屆國際漢語敎學討論會論文選 / 北京語言學院出版社

[journal] 毛海燕 / 1999 / 韓國學生'了1'使用上的偏誤分析 / 중국어문학지 6

[journal] 楊素英 / 2000 / 當代動貌理論與漢語 / 語法硏究和探索 9

[book] 劉月華等 / 2001 / 實用現代漢語語法 / 商務印書館

[journal] 陳平 / 1988 / 論現代漢語時間系統的三元結構 / 中國語文

[book] Comrie, Bernard / 1976 / Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems / Cambridge University Press

[journal] Huang / 1989 / An Aspectual System in Mandarin Chinese / Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17

[book] Klein, Wolfgang / 1994 / Time in Language in: 언어와 시간 / 역락

[book] Li, Charles N. / 1981 / Mandarin Chinese - A Functional Reference Grammar in: 표준 중국어 문법 / 한울아카데미

[journal] Lin, Jo-wang / 2003 / Aspectual Selection and Negation in Mandarin Chinese / Linguistics 41

[book] Smith, Carlota S. / 1991 / The Parameter of Aspect / Kluwer Academic Publishers

[journal] Shi, Ziqiang / 1990 / Decomposition of Perfectivity and Inchoativity and the Meaning of the Particle Le in Mandarin Chinese / Journal of Chinese Linguistics 18 : 95~123

[book] Tai, James H.-Y. / 1984 / Verbs and Times in Chinese: Vendler's four categories / CLS

[book] Vendler, Zeno / 1967 / Linguistics in Philosophy / Cornell University Press

[journal] Xiao / 2004 / A corpus-based two-level model of situation aspect / Journal of Linguistics 40

이 논문은 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 작성되었습니다.

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status