Re-consideration on Choi Chi-won's Prose

YU Subin

doi:10.52723/JKL.44.265

The purpose of this paper is to raise questions about the existing perspectives that evaluated the prose of Choi Chi-won(崔致遠, 857～?) based on pianliwen(騈麗文) only and carry out a thorough review of the literary style and personality of his proses. Based on Gyewonpilgyeongjip(桂苑筆耕集), his prose collection written under the flag of Go Byeong(高騈, 821～887) during his stay in Tang China, all people from the literary men in the past to the contemporary researchers, have recognized Choi Chi-won as a writer of pianliwen. However, some proses different from rated pianliwen are captured in Gowoonjip(孤雲集) and Gowoonsokjip(孤雲續集) which were written after he returned to Shilla. On this paper, we tried to research the elements of pianliwen and the elements of ancient-style proses from his proses for the first time as he showed the slightly different literary style from the formal style since he returned to Shilla, unlike while he stayed in Tang China where he wrote only a formal pianliwen, and we thought it very important phenomenon regardless of the weight. First, it was needed to identify clearly what the elements of pianliwen are, in order to classify the elements of pianliwen and the elements of ancient-style proses from the proses of Choi Chi-won. Through his proses on Gyewonpilgyeongjip, we could find his techniques that used the related idioms of ancient events properly while keeping Pyeongcheuk(平仄) and Daejang(對仗) strictly in order to clarify his intentions. We continued to study his proses written after he returned to Shilla through Gowoonjip and Gowoonsokjip. At this time, we examined the proses by classifying into Jueui type(奏議類) which is same style of the prose written during his stay in Tang China and different style Japgi type(雜記類) and Biji type(碑誌類). First, for Jueui type, we found that there was not a difference formally from his prose during his stay in Tang China but he created and used the terminology such as ‘Jejam(鯷岑)’ or ‘Shinhak(蜃壑)’ which means ‘Shilla’ for the first time which showed a big difference in terms of the content. For Japgi type and Biji type, it was found that he showed new writing style away from the strict form of pianliwen. He could not obey the rule of Daejang and Pyeongcheuk as he quoted the original sentences as they are without adding or deleting from the sources of quotation, and even he did not follow the four-six letter rhyming couplets which is the basic form of pianliwen. This is explained that he focused on the contents rather than the form. As the background of this change, it is possible to present the situation of the Chinese literary world at the macro level and direct and indirect relationship with Chinese writers at the micro level. In short, it can be said that at least until the Tang Dynasty, the relationship between pianliwen(騈麗文) and ancient-style proses(古文) was not very exclusive, and the Chinese literary style was directly or indirectly accepted, creating a new style of writing. In brief, this paper is the result of our efforts to reconsider the writing style and personality of Choi Chi-won's proses. Based on this paper, if more detailed observation and analysis were carried out about the form and contents of his proses, we will be able to look at the stature of Choi Chi-won and the history of Chinese-language literature of Korea in a new light.

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)
REFERENCES (61)
열림/닫힘 버튼
* 2022년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.

[book] 崔致遠 / 2000 / 崔文昌侯全集 / 성균관대학교 대동문화연구소

[book] 崔致遠 / 2018 / 崔致遠全集上․中․下 / 上海古籍出版社

[book] 金澤榮 / 韶濩堂集

[book] 權近 / 陽村集

[book] 徐居正 / 1994 / 東文選 / 民族文化刊行會

[book] 徐有榘 / 楓石全集

[other] 李圭景 / 五洲衍文長箋散稿 / 古典刊行會本

[book] 李穡 / 牧隱藁

[book] 李瀷 / 星湖全集

[book] 李齊賢 / 益齋亂稿

[book] 崔致遠 / 桂苑筆耕集

[book] 崔致遠 / 孤雲集

[book] 洪奭周 / 淵泉集

[other] / 廣弘明集, 大正藏 52

[other] / 大方廣佛華嚴經, 大正藏 10

[book] 김영식 / 2010 / 문선 역주 1․9 / 소명출판

[book] 이상현 / 2009 / 계원필경집 1․2 / 한국고전번역원

[book] 이상현 / 2009 / 고운집 / 한국고전번역원

[book] 이우성 / 1995 / 신라 사산비명 / 아세아문화사

[book] 정선용 / 2003 / 국역 해동역사 / 민족문화추진회

[book] 최영성 / 2014 / 교주 사산비명 / 이른아침

[book] 심경호 / 2013 / 한문산문미학 / 고려대학교 출판부

[book] 심경호 / 2021 / 한국의 석비문과 비지문 / 일조각

[book] 이구의 / 2005 / 최고운문학연구 / 아세아문화사

[book] 錢冬父 / 2009 / 당송고문운동 / 학고방

[book] 莫道才 / 1997 / 騈文觀止 / 文化藝術出版社

[book] 房本文 / 2018 / 唐代古文运动发微 / 安徽大学出版社

[book] 方曉偉 / 2007 / 崔致遠思想和作品硏究 / 廣陵書社

[book] 沙红兵 / 2008 / 唐宋八大家骈文研究 / 人民文学出版社出版社

[book] 王力 / 1976 / 古漢語通論 / 中外出版社

[book] 張仁靑 / 1984 / 騈文學上 / 文史哲出版社

[journal] 김문기 / 1987 / 崔致遠의 四山碑銘연구: 실태조사와 내용 및 문체분석을 중심으로 / 퇴계학과 유교문화 / 경북대학교 퇴계학연구소 (15) : 125~179

[journal] 김은정 / 2012 / The aspect of accepting the Chinese poetry between late Shilla and early Goryeo through ShibChoSi(十抄詩) / 한국한시연구 / 한국한시학회 (20) : 5~40

[thesis] 金重烈 / 1984 / 崔致遠文學硏究 / 박사 / 고려대학교 대학원

[journal] 김혈조 / 2008 / Classical prose style of mid-Goryeo era / 漢文學報 / 우리한문학회 18(1) : 85~120

[journal] 남동신 / 2011 / Understanding Gyewonpilgyeongjip(桂苑筆耕集) from a Cultural Historical Perspective / 진단학보 / 진단학회 (112) : 183~214

[journal] 남재철 / 2011 / The Status of Choi Chi-won in the Poetical Cycles at the End of Tang Dynasty - Focused on the Aspect of Companionship with Tang Poets in Tang period - / 진단학보 / 진단학회 (112) : 291~319

[journal] 문선희 / 2007 / 高麗 14세기 「40華嚴經」寫經變相圖 연구 / 불교미술사학 / 불교미술사학회 5 : 429~472

[journal] 박영희 / 2020 / Reconsideration of the reason for ancient Official documents being written by Parallel style -Focused on Biaowen of Han Yu and Li Shangyin- / 중국학보 / 한국중국학회 (93) : 93~108

[journal] 박우훈 / 2012 / 騈儷文과 韻·散文의 關係 / 중국산문연구집간 / 한국중국산문학회 2 : 33~49

[journal] 서정화 / 2010 / Reappraisal of Advocation for Writing Classical Style Prose asserted by Lee Je-hyun / 대동한문학(大東漢文學) / 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회) (32) : 199~230

[thesis] 신동하 / 2000 / 신라 불국토사상의 전개양상과 역사적 의의 / 박사 / 서울대학교 대학원

[journal] 심경호 / 2020 / An Application of Pianwen Style and its Cultural-Historical Function in Korean Classical Chinese Literature / 한국한문학연구 / 한국한문학회 (77) : 225~300 / 10.30527/klcc..77.202003.007

[thesis] 劉永奉 / 1993 / 「四山碑銘」硏究 / 박사 / 成均館大學校大學院

[book] 柳鐸一 / 1977 / 孤雲의 思想과 文學 / 新知書院 : 335~394

[journal] 李九義 / 2003 / A study on the epitaph of Nanghye, a Buddhist priest by Choi, Chi-won / 동방한문학 / 동방한문학회 25 : 135~170

[journal] 李九義 / 2003 / A study on the epitaph of Bungeomsa Zi-Zeung, the great priest by Chae Chi-won / 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학) / 한민족어문학회 (42) : 2~60

[journal] 이문기 / 2015 / The Review regarding a Daegu powerful family at the end of Silla, according to 「Silla Suchanggun Hogugseong Palgagdeungrugi」 / 동방한문학 / 동방한문학회 (63) : 149~184 / 10.17293/dbkcls.2015..63.149

[journal] 이문기 / 2020 / Choi Chi-Won's Perceptions of Reality and the Background of Discription on the His Silla Suchanggun Hogukseong Palgak Deungrugi / 신라사학보 / 신라사학회 (50) : 287~312

[journal] 이성호 / 2015 / Hong, Seok-Ju’s Theory on Classical Prose(古文論) and the meaning of Publication of Gyewonpilgyeongjjp(『桂苑筆耕集』) / 한국사상과 문화 / 한국사상문화학회 (78) : 157~182

[thesis] 李英徽 / 1990 / 羅·麗代騈儷文 연구 / 석사 / 忠南大學校大學院

[other] 李仁榮 / 1941 / 古書雜記 / 春秋 : 189~198

[journal] 정선모 / 2011 / A Investigation into Initial studies of ancient prose of the Tang唐 and Song宋 dynasty in the Gaoli高麗 dynasty, focusing on the diplomatic relations with Northern Song北宋 dynasty / 한국한문학연구 / 한국한문학회 (48) : 11~49 / 10.30527/klcc..48.201112.001

[journal] 정용수 / 2010 / The approval of East Asia sea-immortal culture and the road / 동양한문학연구 / 동양한문학회 31(31) : 317~337 / 10.35374/dyha.31.31.201008.012

[journal] 조은상 / 2004 / Re-examination of The Literary Groups of Fu Ku Movement in Tang Dynasty / 중국학보 / 한국중국학회 49 : 119~136

[journal] 진민희 / 2017 / A Study on the 「Shillu-gi(蜃樓記)」 Workgroup in the joseon dynasty / 민족문학사연구 / 민족문학사연구소 (64) : 265~297

[journal] 최영성 / 2009 / 崔致遠 사상에서의 보편성과 특수성의 문제 -東人意識과 同文意識을 중심으로- / 동양문화연구 / 동양문화연구원 4 : 89~114 / 10.22863/eacs.2009.4..89

[journal] 최원식 / 1985 / 新羅下代의 海印寺와 華嚴宗 / 한국사연구 / 한국사연구회 49 : 1~25

[book] 홍우흠 / 1991 / 한국한문학과 유교문화 / 아세아문화사 : 3~18

[thesis] 房本文 / 2013 / 士族興衰與駢散消長: 唐代古文運動發微 / 박사 / 南京大學

[journal] 崔藝花 / 2010 / 晚唐詩在崔致遠的影響與接受 / 人力資源管理 / 聊城大學外國語學院 (5) : 274~275

KJC Korea
Journal Central

Statistics

Tools

Sharing

Issue List

Citation status