This study intends to develop and apply the frame for analysis of utterance. Previous studies which could be identified ’utterance factors’ and ’utterance type’ were reviewed. Factors for utterance judgment were ’turn taking’, ’utterance final intonation’, and ’pause’. The system of the utterance judgement based on these factors was suggested. And construction factors of utterance were ’completion for grammar’, ’sentence final ending’, and ’pause’. The utterance type was divided based on these construction factors. In addition the kinds of utterance type were classified into specific group: ’normal’, ’reversing’, ’duplicating’, and ’connecting’. After developing the frame for analysis of utterance, we applied the frame to the real data(utterances). More comprehensive empirical frame for utterance was suggested, the utterance factors were operationally defined, and this frame was verified to be applied.
@article{ART001613022}, author={Soo-Jin Kim and 차재은 and 오재혁}, title={Utterance factors and utterance type}, journal={Korean Semantics}, issn={1226-7198}, year={2011}, volume={36}, pages={91-118}
TY - JOUR AU - Soo-Jin Kim AU - 차재은 AU - 오재혁 TI - Utterance factors and utterance type JO - Korean Semantics PY - 2011 VL - 36 IS - null PB - The Society Of Korean Semantics SP - 91 EP - 118 SN - 1226-7198 AB - This study intends to develop and apply the frame for analysis of utterance. Previous studies which could be identified ’utterance factors’ and ’utterance type’ were reviewed. Factors for utterance judgment were ’turn taking’, ’utterance final intonation’, and ’pause’. The system of the utterance judgement based on these factors was suggested. And construction factors of utterance were ’completion for grammar’, ’sentence final ending’, and ’pause’. The utterance type was divided based on these construction factors. In addition the kinds of utterance type were classified into specific group: ’normal’, ’reversing’, ’duplicating’, and ’connecting’. After developing the frame for analysis of utterance, we applied the frame to the real data(utterances). More comprehensive empirical frame for utterance was suggested, the utterance factors were operationally defined, and this frame was verified to be applied. KW - 말차례(turn taking);발화 요소(utterance factors);발화 유형(utterance type);연결어미 발화(utterance with connective ending);조각 발화(fragment utterance);종결 억양(utterance final intonation);종결어미 발화(utterance with sentence final ending);휴지(pause) DO - UR - ER -
Soo-Jin Kim, 차재은 and 오재혁. (2011). Utterance factors and utterance type. Korean Semantics, 36, 91-118.
Soo-Jin Kim, 차재은 and 오재혁. 2011, "Utterance factors and utterance type", Korean Semantics, vol.36, pp.91-118.
Soo-Jin Kim, 차재은, 오재혁 "Utterance factors and utterance type" Korean Semantics 36 pp.91-118 (2011) : 91.
Soo-Jin Kim, 차재은, 오재혁. Utterance factors and utterance type. 2011; 36 91-118.
Soo-Jin Kim, 차재은 and 오재혁. "Utterance factors and utterance type" Korean Semantics 36(2011) : 91-118.
Soo-Jin Kim; 차재은; 오재혁. Utterance factors and utterance type. Korean Semantics, 36, 91-118.
Soo-Jin Kim; 차재은; 오재혁. Utterance factors and utterance type. Korean Semantics. 2011; 36 91-118.
Soo-Jin Kim, 차재은, 오재혁. Utterance factors and utterance type. 2011; 36 91-118.
Soo-Jin Kim, 차재은 and 오재혁. "Utterance factors and utterance type" Korean Semantics 36(2011) : 91-118.