A Study on Reconstruction of Aggregate Buildings and Site Right as Ownership
2009, 45(), pp.99-128
Publisher : Korean Public Land Law Association
Research Area : Law
-
Abstract As presented above, this study analyzed how site right in the reconstruction of aggregate buildings should be treated legally and concluded that, different from that in the sales of newly constructed aggregate buildings, site right in the reconstruction of aggregate buildings should be legally established as ownership. First, as in the results of analyzing reconstruction cases in the Changwon area, division ownership and site right in aggregate buildings have integration, and site right, which has prevented inconveniences in the life of the division owners of an aggregate building, does not play any function in reconstruction. Then, we have to go back to the question of whether, in the division ownership of an aggregate building, site right cannot be legally established as division ownership over the land. It is because the criterion for determining a partner’s gratuitous equity area in the reconstruction of an aggregate building is “the land area invested by the partner” or “the price/area of the land and building invested by the partner” and, after all, it is the land area as the building is dismantled and removed in reconstruction. Second, in the reconstruction of an aggregate building, site right should be included as one of factors determining the gratuitous equity ratio of reconstruction along with floor area ratio, sales price per pyeong, land equity, and construction cost per pyeong. It is because this is a very important factor in determining the gratuitous equity ratio of building division owners who failed to acquire an equity of land ownership unexpected on the legislation of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings. Third, in the reconstruction of an aggregate building, site right forms a part of integrated division ownership over the building and the land allotted according to the supplying area of the building (private area + public dwelling area) and the supplying area of the land, namely, “shared equity in proportion to the private area of the supplied housing” or “shared equity in proportion to the supplying area of the building.” As discussed above, it is considered necessary to make legislative improvements for establishing building division owners’ sight right as division ownership integrating the building and the land in the reconstruction of aggregate buildings. key word: reconstruction, division ownership, Site Right as Ownership, the supplying area of the building, the supplying area of the land.
-
[journal] 김기동 / 1995 / 집합건물의 구분소유자들이 가지는 대지권의 내용 / 대법원판레해설 / 법원행정처 (23)
[book] 김용한 / 1985 / 집합건물법상의 관리단, 개정민사법해설 / 한국사법행정학회
[journal] 김용한 / 1984 / 집합건물법상의 대지 및 대지사용권 / 판례월보
[book] 김용한 / 1984 / 구분소유자의 의무위반 / 고시계
[journal] 김용한 / 1984 / 집합건물의 재건축과 복구 / 법조 33
[journal] 김황식 / 1988 / 집합건물의 공용부분에 관한 등기 / 등기에 관한 제문제(하), 재판자료 / 법원행정처 44
[journal] 안갑준 / 1996 / 건물의 구분소유와 그 등기절차 / 법무사 (348)
[thesis] 이원민 / 1995 / 주택재개발구역내 토지평가방법에 관한 연구 / 석사 / 건국대학교 대학원
[book] 이홍권 / 1992 / 건물구분소유권의 성립과 소멸에 관한 몇가지 문제 / 한국사법행정학회
[book] 이태운 / 2000 / 집합건물의소유및관리에관한법률 in:주석민법<물권(2)> / 한국사법행정학회
[book] 玉田弘毅 / 1975 / 建物區分所有權法 / 一粒社
[book] 稻本洋之助 / 2004 / コンメンタールマンション區分所有法 / 日本評論社
[book] 小沼進一 / 1992 / 區分所有法 / 法律文化社
[book] 水本浩 / 1994 / 基本法コンメンタ一ル, マンション法 / 一本評論社
[journal] 玉田弘毅 / 1993 / 分讓マンションの管理室が傳有部分でないとされた事例 / 法學敎室 (158)
[journal] 山上知裕 / 1997 / マンションの駐車場專用使用權裁判例の檢討(1) / NBL (620) : 33~
[journal] 川島一郞 / 1962 / 建物の區分所有に關する新法律の解說(中) / 法曺時報 14(6)
[book] 石田喜久夫 / 1970 / 區分所有權, 住宅關係法 Ⅱ(住宅問題講座 3) / 有斐閣
[book] 石田喜久夫 / 1970 / 區分所有權, 住宅關係法 Ⅱ(住宅問題講座 3) / 有斐閣 : 153~
-
196 Viewed
Print this page
Search PDF