<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/resources/xsl/jats-html.xsl"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ksdh</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Korean Society of Dental Hygiene</journal-title>
        <trans-title-group>
          <trans-title xml:lang="ko">한국치위생학회지</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
        <abbrev-journal-title>J Korean Soc Dent Hyg</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2287-1705</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2288-2294</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Korean Society of Dental Hygiene</publisher-name>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="ko">한국치위생학회</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jksdh-2022-22-1-1</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13065/jksdh.20220001</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Original Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Oral health belief and satisfaction after scaling experience with comprehensive dental hygiene care</article-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ko">
          <trans-title>포괄치위생관리(CDHC) 과정 적용에 따른 스케일링 경험 대상자의 구강건강신념과 만족도</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" rid="aff1">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            <given-names>Mi-Hye</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Moon</surname>
            <given-names>Sang-Eun</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" rid="aff1">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            <given-names>Yun-Jeong</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" rid="aff1">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            <given-names>Seon-Yeong</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" rid="aff1">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Cho</surname>
            <given-names>Hye-Eun</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" rid="aff1">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kang</surname>
            <given-names>Hyun-Joo</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">Department of Dental Hygiene, Kwangju Women&#x2019;s University</aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1"><bold>Corresponding Author: Sang-Eun Moon,</bold> Department of Dental Hygiene, Kwangju Women&#x2019;s University, 201, Yeodaegil, Gwangsan-gu, Gwangju 62396, Korea. Tel : +82-62-950-3840, Fax : +82-62-950-3841, E-mail : <email>semoon@kwu.ac.kr</email></corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <day>28</day>
        <month>02</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>9</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>24</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>27</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>28</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2022, Korean Society of Dental Hygiene</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0">
          <license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License(<uri>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</uri>)</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <sec>
          <title>Objectives:</title>
          <p>This study was conducted to find scaling patients&#x2019; oral health belief and satisfaction by applying Comprehensive Dental Hygiene Care (CDHC) process.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Methods:</title>
          <p>From July 1 to September 20, 2020, the data about 182 patients who had scaling in dental clinics and hospitals had been collected and analyzed. For data analysis, SPSS Statistics 22.0 was applied to conduct frequency analysis, chi-square, t-test, One way ANOVA and Pearson&#x2019;s correlation analysis.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Results:</title>
          <p>Regarding oral health behavior, in the CDHC group 92.4% used oral care products (<italic>p</italic> &#x3C;0.001), and 67.4% regularly visited dental clinics for oral care (<italic>p</italic> &#x3C;0.001). Regarding the oral health belief according to general characteristics, in the CDHC group, persons aged &#x2018;50-65&#x2019; scored 2.4 (the highest), and were significantly different from those aged &#x2018;20-29&#x2019; as the result of post-hoc analysis (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001). Regarding the oral health belief of the CDHC group according to oral health behavior, the scaling cycle &#x2018;3 months&#x2019; scored the highest (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05). The patients&#x2019; satisfaction had high correlations with benefit (<italic>p</italic> &#x3C;0.01) and Importance (<italic>p</italic> &#x3C;0.05) as the sub factors of the oral health belief of the CDHC group.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Conclusions:</title>
          <p>CDHC positively influenced scaling patients&#x2019; oral health belief and satisfaction. Therefore, it is necessary to expand CDHC, as the medium to improve oral health belief and satisfaction, to clinical settings.</p>
        </sec>
      </abstract>
      <trans-abstract xml:lang="ko">
        <sec>
          <title>연구목적:</title>
          <p>본 연구는 포괄치위생관리(Comprehensive Dental Hygiene Care; CDHC) 과정 적용에 따른 스케일링 경험 대상자의 구강건강신념과 만족도를 확인하고자 수행하였다.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>연구방법:</title>
          <p>2020년 7월 1일부터 2020년 9월 20일까지 치과 병&#xB7;의원에서 스케일링을 받은 대상자 182명의 자료를 수집하여 분석하였다. 자료는 SPSS Statistics 22.0을 이용하여 빈도분석, chi-square, t-test, One way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation analysis를 실시하였다.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>연구결과:</title>
          <p>구강건강행태는 CDHC 적용 그룹에서 칫솔, 치약 외 구강관리용품 사용 92.4%(<italic>p</italic> &#x3C;0.001), 구강관리를 위한 정기적인 치과 방문이 67.4%였다(<italic>p</italic> &#x3C;0.001). 일반적 특성에 따른 구강건강신념은 CDHC 적용 그룹에서 연령 &#x2018;50-65세&#x2019;가 2.41로 가장 높았고, 사후검정 결과 &#x2018;20-29세&#x2019;와 유의한 차이가 있었다(<italic>p</italic> &#x3C;0.001). CDHC 적용 그룹에서 구강건강행태에 따른 구강건강신념은 스케일링 주기 &#x2018;3개월&#x2019;이 가장 높았다(<italic>p</italic> &#x3C;0.05). CDHC 적용 그룹의 구강건강신념 하위 요소인 유익성(<italic>p</italic> &#x3C;0.01)과 중요성(<italic>p</italic> &#x3C;0.05)이 높을수록 만족도와 높은 상관관계를 보였다.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>결론:</title>
          <p>CDHC 적용이 스케일링 경험 대상자들의 구강건강신념과 만족도에 긍정적인 영향을 주는 것을 알 수 있었다. CDHC 과정 적용은 구강건강신념과 만족도를 높이는 매개로써 임상에 더욱 확산하여야 할 것이다.</p>
        </sec>
      </trans-abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Comprehensive dental hygiene care (CDHC)</kwd>
        <kwd>Oral health belief</kwd>
        <kwd>Patient satisfaction</kwd>
        <kwd>Scaling</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="ko">
        <kwd>구강건강신념</kwd>
        <kwd>스케일링</kwd>
        <kwd>포괄치위생관리(CDHC)</kwd>
        <kwd>환자 만족도</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Periodontal disease first starts as an inflammation. The lack of proper management leads to symptoms such as gingival bleeding and recession, periodontal pocket formation, and destruction of alveolar bone, which subsequently cause tooth loss. This chronic disease is observed in adults and progresses in earnest after the age of 20 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r001">[1]</xref>. Approximately 85% of adults in Korea contracted periodontal disease, and the prevalence of peritonitis increases with age <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r002">[2]</xref>. According to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) in 2019, &#x2018;gingivitis and periodontal disease&#x2019; was ranked as the most common disease <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r003">[3]</xref>. Periodontal disease is a bacterial infection of the periodontal tissue. Mature oral biofilms are calcified to plaques on the tooth surface and form on natural teeth or prosthesis. These plaques act as a local source of periodontal disease by causing mechanical stimulation to the gingiva and subsequent inflammation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r004">[4]</xref>. Therefore, scaling to remove oral biofilms and plaques is an essential procedure that determines the prevention and treatment of periodontal disease <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r005">[5]</xref>. Local factors such as dental plaques and deposits that cause dental caries and periodontal disease may be removed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r006">[6]</xref> to improve the oral health.</p>
      <p>Comprehensive dental hygiene care (CDHC) [assessment-dental hygiene diagnosis-planning-implementation-evaluation (re-evaluation after 4 weeks) + documentation] applied to scaling for more systematic and efficient management of periodontal disease is an evidence-based process to improve the oral health through oral disease prevention and treatment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r007">[7]</xref>. CDHC is an individually tailored professional dental hygiene process that reviews the oral health, finds potential problems, plans and executes customized prevention and treatment, and effectively manage the treatment through the evaluation of healing and results based on dental hygiene assessment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r008">[8]</xref>. As defined in social psychology, believe and behaviors are directly related to one another, and knowledge about an individual&#x2019;s belief and attitude can accurately measure a given behavior <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r009">[9]</xref>. The health belief model is the most influential and universally used model for explaining health-related behaviors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r010">[10]</xref>. The model has been previously used to describe the behaviors of people who believe oneself is healthy for the prevention and detection of disease in asymptomatic stage and its related factors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r011">[11]</xref>. For a quality life, it is necessary to increase not only health belief, but also oral health belief that can improve awareness and behavior of oral health. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess oral health belief and satisfaction after scaling experience with CDHC at dental hospitals and clinics and provide basic data on the necessity and clinical application of CDHC.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s2" sec-type="methods">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <sec id="s2a">
        <title>1. Participants and methods</title>
        <p>This study was conducted from July 1, 2020 to September 20, 2020 with the approval of the 00 University Institutional Review Board (IRB) (IRB approval number:1041485-202005-HR-001-09). Those between the age of 20 and 65 who voluntarily agreed to this study and had experiences of scaling were conveniently extracted. Then, only those who understood the purpose of this study and provided a written consent form were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire.</p>
        <p>The minimum number of participants required for this study were calculated using G*power 3.1.9.4 program with an effect size of 0.15, significance of 0.05, and power of 0.85. A minimum number of 87 participants was required per group with a total of 174 participants. As a result, 190 participants were recruited, in consideration of 10% dropout rate. Among the retrieved questionnaires, six questionnaires were excluded for incomplete responses, and 184 questionnaires were included in the final analysis. A total of 92 participants were included in each of the two groups: scaling with CDHC (CDHC group) and scaling without CDHC (non-CDHC group).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s2b">
        <title>2. Study tools</title>
        <p>Oral health belief was evaluated using a tool developed by Kim <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r010">[10]</xref>, which was modified and supplemented for use in this study. The tool consisted of 25 items in total with 5 items for each of sensitivity, severity, benefit, importance, and disability. Each item was evaluated on a five-point scale from &#x2018;strongly disagree&#x2019; for one point to &#x2018;strongly agree&#x2019; for five points. For analysis, &#x2018;strongly disagree&#x2019; and &#x2018;disagree&#x2019; was converted into &#x2018;disagree&#x2019;, and &#x2018;strongly agree&#x2019; and &#x2018;agree&#x2019; were converted into &#x2018;agree&#x2019;. &#x2018;Disagree&#x2019;, &#x2018;neutral&#x2019;, and &#x2018;agree&#x2019; were given a score of one, two, and three points, respectively for analysis. A higher score indicated a greater belief about sensitivity, severity, benefit, and importance, and a lower score indicated less disability.</p>
        <p>Oral health behavior was evaluated using a tool used by Lee <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r011">[11]</xref>, which was modified and supplemented for use in this study. The tool consisted of seven items, including three items on the frequency, timing, and duration of brushing, two items on the use and type of oral hygiene supplements, one item on regular oral health checkups, and one item on regular scaling interval. Satisfaction was evaluated using a tool used by Hong et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r012">[12]</xref> and Han <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r013">[13]</xref>. The tool was modified and consisted of eight items. Awareness of CDHC procedure was evaluated using a tool used by Moon et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r014">[14]</xref>. The tool was modified to reflect the dental clinical settings in Korea, and items on periodontal examination during CDHC process were re-written in simpler terms to enhance the understanding of the participants. The tool consisted of 10 items in total. Cronbach&#x2019;s &#x3B1; excluding general characteristics, was 0.749 for oral health belief and 0.890 for satisfaction.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s2c">
        <title>3. Statistical analysis</title>
        <p>Data were analyzed using SPSS for Window version 22.0 (IBM Co, Armonk, NY, USA), and all statistical significance (&#x3B1;) was set to 0.05. Chi-square test was conducted to compare oral health behaviors between the groups who underwent scaling with or without CDHC. Independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA were conducted to compare oral health belief and satisfaction according to general characteristics and oral health behaviors. Scheffé test was conducted for post-hoc analysis. Independent sample t-test was conducted to compare oral health belief and satisfaction according to the awareness of CDHC. Lastly, Pearson&#x2019;s correlation analysis was performed on the relationship between satisfaction and sub-factors of oral health belief in the CDHC group.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec id="s3a">
        <title>1. Oral health behavior of CDHC and non-CDHC groups</title>
        <p>Approximately 92.4% of CDHC group and 70.7% of non-CDHC group used oral care products other than toothbrush and toothpaste (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001). In the CDHC group, 67.4% visited the dental hygienist on a regular basis for oral care. On the other hand, only 33.7% of the non-CDHC group regularly visited the dental hygienist for oral care (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001). In the CDHC group, 38.0%, 34.8%, 16.3%, and 10.9% underwent scaling every 12 months, six months, three months, and other, respectively. In the non-CDHC group, 60.9%, 12.0%, 3.3%, and 23.9% received scaling every 12 months, six months, three months, and other, respectively (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001) &#x3C;<xref ref-type="table" rid="t001">Table 1</xref>&#x3E;.</p><table-wrap id="t001" position="float"> <label>Table 1.</label> <caption><title> Oral health behavior of CDHC and non-CDHC groups </title></caption> <table rules="groups" frame="hsides"> <thead> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="right" colspan="5">Unit: N(%)</th> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="left">Characteristics</th> <th align="left">Division</th> <th align="center">CDHC group</th> <th align="center">non - CDHC group</th> <th align="center">&#x3C7;&#xB2; (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Average number of toothbrushing a day</td> <td align="left">&#x2264; 2</td> <td align="center">31 (33.7)</td> <td align="center">34 (37.0)</td> <td align="center">4.549 (0.103)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">3</td> <td align="center">39 (42.4)</td> <td align="center">47 (51.1)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">4 &#x2264;</td> <td align="center">22 (23.9)</td> <td align="center">11 (12.0)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Average toothbrushing time a day<sup>&#x2020;</sup> </td> <td align="left">Before breakfast</td> <td align="center">42 (22.8)</td> <td align="center">36 (19.6)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">After breakfast</td> <td align="center">58 (31.5)</td> <td align="center">57 (31.0)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">After lunch</td> <td align="center">59 (32.1)</td> <td align="center">56 (30.4)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">After dinner</td> <td align="center">44 (23.9)</td> <td align="center">46 (25.0)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Before sleep</td> <td align="center">61 (33.2)</td> <td align="center">53 (28.8)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">After snack</td> <td align="center">8 ( 4.3) </td> <td align="center">5 ( 2.7)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Average daily toothbrushing time (1 toothbrushing time: minute)</td> <td align="left">&#x3C; 2</td> <td align="center">28 (30.4)</td> <td align="center">34 (37.0)</td> <td align="center">0.878 (0.645)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">2 - 3 &#xFF1E;</td> <td align="center">45 (48.9)</td> <td align="center">41 (44.6)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">3 &#x2264;</td> <td align="center">19 (20.7)</td> <td align="center">17 (18.5)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Use oral care products other than toothbrush and toothpaste</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">85 (92.4)</td> <td align="center">65 (70.7)</td> <td align="center">14.431 (&#x3C; 0.001)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">7 ( 7.6) </td> <td align="center">27 (29.3)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Types of oral care products used<sup>&#x2020;</sup> </td> <td align="left">Floss</td> <td align="center">42 (29.8)</td> <td align="center">28 (29.5)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Interdental brush</td> <td align="center">46 (32.6)</td> <td align="center">25 (26.3)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Mouthwash</td> <td align="center">29 (20.6)</td> <td align="center">25 (26.3)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Electric toothbrush</td> <td align="center">7 ( 5.0) </td> <td align="center">9 ( 9.5)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Waterpik</td> <td align="center">17 (12.1)</td> <td align="center">8 ( 8.4)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Visit dental clinics on a regular basis for oral care</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">62 (67.4)</td> <td align="center">31 (33.7)</td> <td align="center">20.894 (&#x3C; 0.001)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">30 (32.6)</td> <td align="center">61 (66.3)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Scaling cycle (months)</td> <td align="left">3</td> <td align="center">15 (16.3)</td> <td align="center">3 ( 3.3) </td> <td align="center">27.602 (&#x3C; 0.001)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">6</td> <td align="center">32 (34.8)</td> <td align="center">11 (12.0)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">12</td> <td align="center">35 (38.0)</td> <td align="center">56 (60.9)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Other</td> <td align="center">10 (10.9)</td> <td align="center">22 (23.9)</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table-wrap-foot> <p><sup>*</sup>by chi-square test</p> <p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>multiple responses</p> </table-wrap-foot> </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s3b">
        <title>2. Oral health belief and satisfaction according to general characteristics of CDHC and non-CDHC groups</title>
        <p>In the CDHC group, those between the age of 50-65 had the highest score for oral health belief at 2.41 points. Post-hoc analysis showed that those between the age of 50-65 had a significantly greater score for oral health belief than those between the age of 20-29 (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001). Oral health belief was high at 2.43 points as subjective oral health awareness was &#x2018;bad&#x2019;. Post-hoc analysis showed that the oral health belief of those with &#x2018;bad&#x2019; subjective oral health awareness were significantly higher than that of those with &#x2018;normal&#x2019; and &#x2018;good&#x2019; subjective oral health awareness (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001). In the non-CDHC group, oral heath belief was high at 2.41 points as subjective oral health awareness was &#x2018;bad&#x2019;. The oral health belief of those with &#x2018;bad&#x2019; subjective oral health awareness were significantly higher than that of those with &#x2018;normal&#x2019; and &#x2018;good&#x2019; subjective oral health awareness (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001) &#x3C;<xref ref-type="table" rid="t002">Table 2</xref>&#x3E;.</p><table-wrap id="t002" position="float"> <label>Table 2.</label> <caption><title>Oral health belief and satisfaction according to general characteristics of CDHC and non-CDHC group</title></caption> <table rules="groups" frame="hsides"> <thead> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="right" colspan="6">Unit: Mean&#xB1;SD</th> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="left" rowspan="2">Characteristics</th> <th align="left" rowspan="2">Division</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >CDHC group</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >non - CDHC group</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >CDHC group</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >non - CDHC group</th> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="center" colspan="2">Oral health belief</th> <th align="center" colspan="2">Satisfaction</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Gender</td> <td align="left">Male</td> <td align="center">2.33 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.16 &#xB1; 0.28</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.19</td> <td align="center">2.55 &#xB1; 0.50</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Female</td> <td align="center">2.31 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.13 &#xB1; 0.22</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.16</td> <td align="center">2.59 &#xB1; 0.36</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">0.398 (0.691)</td> <td align="center">0.605 (-0.423)</td> <td align="center">-0.053 (0.958)</td> <td align="center">0.547 (0.674)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Age (yrs)</td> <td align="left">20 - 29</td> <td align="center">2.13 &#xB1; 0.26<sup>a</sup></td> <td align="center">2.13 &#xB1; 0.23</td> <td align="center">2.91 &#xB1; 0.21</td> <td align="center">2.69 &#xB1; 0.39</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">30 - 49</td> <td align="center">2.38 &#xB1; 0.21<sup>ab</sup></td> <td align="center">2.15 &#xB1; 0.31</td> <td align="center">2.96 &#xB1; 0.12</td> <td align="center">2.48 &#xB1; 0.54</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">50 - 65</td> <td align="center">2.41 &#xB1; 0.20<sup>b</sup></td> <td align="center">2.16 &#xB1; 0.22</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.18</td> <td align="center">2.54 &#xB1; 0.37</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">14.176 (&#x3C; 0.001)</td> <td align="center">0.133 (0.876)</td> <td align="center">0.588 (0.557)</td> <td align="center">1.807 (0.170)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Marriage</td> <td align="left">Unmarried</td> <td align="center">2.29 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.05&#xB1;0.40</td> <td align="center">2.95 &#xB1; 0.11</td> <td align="center">2.41 &#xB1; 0.64</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Married</td> <td align="center">2.33 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.17 &#xB1; 0.21</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.19</td> <td align="center">2.60 &#xB1; 0.38</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">-0.679 (0.499)</td> <td align="center">-1.864 (0.066)</td> <td align="center">0.524 (0.602)</td> <td align="center">-1.630 (0.107)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Education level</td> <td align="left">&#x2264; High school graduation</td> <td align="center">2.33 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.15 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.94 &#xB1; 0.14</td> <td align="center">2.57 &#xB1; 0.39</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">&#x2265; College graduation</td> <td align="center">2.30 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.14 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.20</td> <td align="center">2.57 &#xB1; 0.52</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">0.434 (0.334)</td> <td align="center">0.164 (0.870)</td> <td align="center">0.665 (0.739)</td> <td align="center">-0.026 (0.979)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Job</td> <td align="left">Employee</td> <td align="center">2.29 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.18 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.94 &#xB1; 0.18</td> <td align="center">2.60 &#xB1; 0.37</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Self - employment</td> <td align="center">2.28 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.07 &#xB1; 0.27</td> <td align="center">2.98 &#xB1; 0.05</td> <td align="center">2.45 &#xB1; 0.59</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Homemaker</td> <td align="center">2.40 &#xB1; 0.23</td> <td align="center">2.40 &#xB1; 0.23</td> <td align="center">2.89 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.22 &#xB1; 0.26</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Student and other</td> <td align="center">2.37 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.37 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.89 &#xB1; 0.16</td> <td align="center">2.14 &#xB1; 0.25</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">1.056 (0.372)</td> <td align="center">1.230 (0.304)</td> <td align="center">0.905 (0.442)</td> <td align="center">1.187 (0.319)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Monthly income of a family</td> <td align="left">&#x2264; 199</td> <td align="center">2.32 &#xB1; 0.23</td> <td align="center">2.03 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.94 &#xB1; 0.15</td> <td align="center">2.48 &#xB1; 0.41</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">200 - 299</td> <td align="center">2.29 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.17 &#xB1; 0.28</td> <td align="center">2.97 &#xB1; 0.10</td> <td align="center">2.65 &#xB1; 0.36</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">300 - 399</td> <td align="center">2.35 &#xB1; 0.15</td> <td align="center">2.26 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.92 &#xB1; 0.14</td> <td align="center">2.51 &#xB1; 0.36</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">400 &#x2264;</td> <td align="center">2.32 &#xB1; 0.29</td> <td align="center">2.14 &#xB1; 0.22</td> <td align="center">2.92 &#xB1; 0.21</td> <td align="center">2.55 &#xB1; 0.52</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">0.173 (0.441)</td> <td align="center">0.1807 (0.152)</td> <td align="center">0.914 (0.725)</td> <td align="center">0.558 (0.644)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Subjective oral health awareness</td> <td align="left">Bad</td> <td align="center">2.43 &#xB1; 0.14<sup>a</sup> </td> <td align="center">2.41 &#xB1; 0.20<sup>a</sup> </td> <td align="center">2.94 &#xB1; 0.14</td> <td align="center">2.73 &#xB1; 0.26</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Normal</td> <td align="center">2.13 &#xB1; 0.25<sup>b</sup> </td> <td align="center">2.12 &#xB1; 0.21<sup>b</sup> </td> <td align="center">2.92 &#xB1; 0.20</td> <td align="center">2.54 &#xB1; 0.47</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Good</td> <td align="center">1.97 &#xB1; 0.19<sup>b</sup> </td> <td align="center">1.98 &#xB1; 0.30<sup>b</sup> </td> <td align="center">2.99 &#xB1; 0.04</td> <td align="center">2.51 &#xB1; 0.41</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">19.331 (&#x3C; 0.001)</td> <td align="center">15.896 (&#x3C; 0.001)</td> <td align="center">0.855 (0.429)</td> <td align="center">1.328 (0.270)</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table-wrap-foot> <p><sup>*</sup>by t-test or one-way ANOVA</p> <p><sup>ab</sup>The same characters are not significant by Scheffé test.</p> </table-wrap-foot> </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s3c">
        <title>3. Oral health belief and satisfaction according to oral health behaviors in CDHC and non-CDHC groups</title>
        <p>In the CDHC group, the oral health belief was highest in those who underwent scaling &#x2018;every three months&#x2019; at 2.33 points. The oral heal belief of those undergoing scaling &#x2018;every three months&#x2019; was significantly higher than that of those undergoing scaling &#x2018;other&#x2019; (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05).</p>
        <p>In the non-CDHC group, the oral health belief was highest in those who brushed their teeth for &#x2018;more than three minutes&#x2019; on average per time at 2.85 points. The oral health belief of those who brushed teeth for &#x2018;more than three minutes&#x2019; was significantly higher than that of those brushing for &#x2018;less than two minutes&#x2019; and &#x2018;two to three minutes&#x2019; (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05) &#x3C;<xref ref-type="table" rid="t003">Table 3</xref>&#x3E;.</p><table-wrap id="t003" position="float"> <label>Table 3.</label> <caption><title> Oral health belief and satisfaction according to oral health behaviors in CDHC and non-CDHC groups</title></caption> <table rules="groups" frame="hsides"> <thead> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="right" colspan="6">Unit: Mean&#xB1;SD</th> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="left" rowspan="2">Characteristics</th> <th align="left" rowspan="2">Division</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >CDHC group</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >non - CDHC group</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >CDHC group</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >non - CDHC group</th> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="center" colspan="2">Oral health belief</th> <th align="center" colspan="2">Satisfaction</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Average number of toothbrushing a day</td> <td align="left">&#x2264; 2</td> <td align="center">2.21 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.22 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.91 &#xB1; 0.19</td> <td align="center">2.57 &#xB1; 0.39</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">3</td> <td align="center">2.15 &#xB1; 0.28</td> <td align="center">2.12 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.95 &#xB1; 0.18</td> <td align="center">2.60 &#xB1; 0.37</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">4 &#x2264;</td> <td align="center">2.16 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.05 &#xB1; 0.28</td> <td align="center">2.94 &#xB1; 0.12</td> <td align="center">2.43 &#xB1; 0.75</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">0.543 (0.583)</td> <td align="center">2.560 (0.083)</td> <td align="center">0.481 (0.620)</td> <td align="center">0.643 (0.528)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Average daily toothbrushing time (1 toothbrushing time: minute)</td> <td align="left">&#x3C; 2</td> <td align="center">2.20 &#xB1; 0.28</td> <td align="center">2.13 &#xB1; 0.22</td> <td align="center">2.91 &#xB1; 0.21</td> <td align="center">2.49 &#xB1; 0.40<sup>a</sup></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">2 - 3 &#x3E;</td> <td align="center">2.17 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.14 &#xB1; 0.28</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.17</td> <td align="center">2.51 &#xB1; 0.48<sup>a</sup></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">3 &#x2264;</td> <td align="center">2.15 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.22 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.96 &#xB1; 0.08</td> <td align="center">2.85 &#xB1; 0.27<sup>b</sup></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">0.196 (0.822)</td> <td align="center">0.748 (0.476)</td> <td align="center">0.470 (0.627)</td> <td align="center">4.879 (0.010)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Use oral care products other than toothbrush and toothpaste</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">2.18 &#xB1; 0.27</td> <td align="center">2.17 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.18</td> <td align="center">2.56 &#xB1; 0.45</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">2.10 &#xB1; 0.22</td> <td align="center">2.11 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.95 &#xB1; 0.14</td> <td align="center">2.59 &#xB1; 0.41</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">0.723 (0.472)</td> <td align="center">0.993 (0.323)</td> <td align="center">-0.228 (0.820)</td> <td align="center">-0.301 (0.764)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Visit dental clinics on a regular basis for oral care</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">2.20 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.19 &#xB1; 0.28</td> <td align="center">2.95 &#xB1; 0.14</td> <td align="center">2.56 &#xB1; 0.52</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">2.12 &#xB1; 0.28</td> <td align="center">2.13 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.89 &#xB1; 0.22</td> <td align="center">2.57 &#xB1; 0.39</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">1.432 (0.156)</td> <td align="center">0.974 (0.333)</td> <td align="center">1.745 (0.084)</td> <td align="center">-0.032 (0.974)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Scaling cycle (Months)</td> <td align="left">3</td> <td align="center">2.33 &#xB1; 0.28<sup>a</sup></td> <td align="center">2.27 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">3.00 &#xB1; 0.00</td> <td align="center">2.58 &#xB1; 0.26</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">6</td> <td align="center">2.16 &#xB1; 0.26<sup>a</sup></td> <td align="center">2.22 &#xB1; 0.42</td> <td align="center">2.96 &#xB1; 0.09</td> <td align="center">2.34 &#xB1; 0.74</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">12</td> <td align="center">2.16 &#xB1; 0.25<sup>ab</sup> </td> <td align="center">2.13 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.90 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.62 &#xB1; 0.37</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">Other</td> <td align="center">2.02 &#xB1; 0.19<sup>b</sup> </td> <td align="center">2.16 &#xB1; 0.17</td> <td align="center">2.86 &#xB1; 0.17</td> <td align="center">2.54 &#xB1; 0.42</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t/F (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>)</td> <td align="center">2.983 (0.036)</td> <td align="center">0.667 (0.574)</td> <td align="center">2.204 (0.093)</td> <td align="center">1.306 (0.278)</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table-wrap-foot> <p><sup>*</sup>by t-test or one-way ANOVA</p> <p><sup>ab</sup>The same characters are not significant by Scheffé test.</p> </table-wrap-foot> </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s3d">
        <title>4. Oral health belief and satisfaction according to the awareness of CDHC process in CDHC and non-CDHC groups</title>
        <p>Oral health belief according to the awareness of CDHC process was analyzed. The request for revisit after plaque removal to assess healing was high in both CDHC (2.19, <italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05) and non-CDHC (2.22, <italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05) groups. In the non-CDHC group, satisfaction increased with explanation of test results (2.64, <italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05), scaling experience using both ultrasound and manual instruments(2.68, <italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05), proficient experience of the dental hygienist with skilled techniques for calculus removal (2.69, <italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05), effort and solicitude to make patients feel comfortable during calculus removal (2.66, <italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05), and experiences of receiving explanations on adequate oral care methods according to oral conditions (2.67, <italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.01) &#x3C;<xref ref-type="table" rid="t004">Table 4</xref>&#x3E;.</p><table-wrap id="t004" position="float"> <label>Table 4.</label> <caption><title>Oral health belief and satisfaction according to the awareness of CDHC process in CDHC and non-CDHC groups</title></caption> <table rules="groups" frame="hsides"> <thead> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="right" colspan="6">Unit: Mean±SD</th> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="left" rowspan="2">Characteristics</th> <th align="left" rowspan="2">Division</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >CDHC group</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >non - CDHC group</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >CDHC group</th> <th align="center" style="border-bottom: solid thin" >non - CDHC group</th> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="center" colspan="2">Oral health belief</th> <th align="center" colspan="2">Satisfaction</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left" colspan="2">Assessment - dental hygiene diagnosis-planning </td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Oral radiography experience </td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">2.16 &#xB1; 0.27</td> <td align="center">2.15 &#xB1; 0.21</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.18</td> <td align="center">2.62 &#xB1; 0.37</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">2.26 &#xB1; 0.22</td> <td align="center">2.15 &#xB1; 0.29</td> <td align="center">2.98 &#xB1; 0.05</td> <td align="center">2.51 &#xB1; 0.50</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>) </td> <td align="center">-0.948 (0.346)</td> <td align="center">0.132 (0.895)</td> <td align="center">-0.799 (0.427)</td> <td align="center">1.224 (0.224)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Gum (alveolar bone) examination experience</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">2.17 &#xB1; 0.27</td> <td align="center">2.18 &#xB1; 0.21</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.18</td> <td align="center">2.64 &#xB1; 0.35</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">2.19 &#xB1; 0.21</td> <td align="center">2.14 &#xB1; 0.27</td> <td align="center">2.92 &#xB1; 0.14</td> <td align="center">2.54 &#xB1; 0.47</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>) </td> <td align="center">-0.340 (0.735)</td> <td align="center">0.865 (0.390)</td> <td align="center">0.292 (0.771)</td> <td align="center">0.218 (0.299)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Test experience using instruments to check for tartar in the gums</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">2.18 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.17 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.94 &#xB1; 0.16</td> <td align="center">2.65 &#xB1; 0.39</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">2.06 &#xB1; 0.33</td> <td align="center">2.14 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.78 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.52 &#xB1; 0.46</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>) </td> <td align="center">0.945 (0.347)</td> <td align="center">0.486 (0.628)</td> <td align="center">1.433 (0.222)</td> <td align="center">1.318 (0.191)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Explanation of test results</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">2.18 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.15 &#xB1; 0.23</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.17</td> <td align="center">2.64 &#xB1; 0.36</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">1.68 &#xB1; 0.00</td> <td align="center">2.15 &#xB1; 0.29</td> <td align="center">2.88 &#xB1; 0.00</td> <td align="center">2.43 &#xB1; 0.53</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>) </td> <td align="center">1.907 (0.060)</td> <td align="center">-0.104 (0.917)</td> <td align="center">0.331 (0.741)</td> <td align="center">2.331 (0.023)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Implementation</td> <td align="left"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Scaling experience using</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">2.17 &#xB1; 0.27</td> <td align="center">2.14 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.94 &#xB1; 0.15</td> <td align="center">2.68 &#xB1; 0.34</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">both ultrasound and manual instruments</td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">2.14 &#xB1; 0.09</td> <td align="center">2.16 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.73 &#xB1; 0.40</td> <td align="center">2.48 &#xB1; 0.49</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>) </td> <td align="center">0.760 (0.467)</td> <td align="center">-0.491 (0.625)</td> <td align="center">1.222 (0.288)</td> <td align="center">2.282 (0.025)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Experience of calculus removal by a dental hygienist with skilled techniques</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">2.16&#xB1;0.25</td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">2.69 &#xB1; 0.32</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">2.13&#xB1;0.25</td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">2.30 &#xB1; 0.53</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>) </td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">0.441 (0.660)</td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">3.733 (0.001)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Effort and solicitude to make patients feel comfortable during calculus removal</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">2.17 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.17 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.93 &#xB1; 0.17</td> <td align="center">2.66 &#xB1; 0.33</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">2.00 &#xB1; 0.00</td> <td align="center">2.09 &#xB1; 0.29</td> <td align="center">2.88 &#xB1; 0.00</td> <td align="center">2.32 &#xB1; 0.58</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>) </td> <td align="center">0.656 (0.514)</td> <td align="center">1.340 (0.184)</td> <td align="center">0.331 (0.741)</td> <td align="center">2.742 (0.010)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Explanations on adequate oral care methods according to oral conditions</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">2.16 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">2.67 &#xB1; 0.34</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">2.13 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">2.31 &#xB1; 0.54</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>) </td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">0.422 (0.674)</td> <td align="center">-</td> <td align="center">3.146 (0.003)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Evaluation</td> <td align="left"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Request for revisit after plaque removal to assess healing</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">2.19 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.22 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.95 &#xB1; 0.11</td> <td align="center">2.67 &#xB1; 0.34</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">1.99 &#xB1; 0.22</td> <td align="center">2.11 &#xB1; 0.25</td> <td align="center">2.70 &#xB1; 0.41</td> <td align="center">2.50 &#xB1; 0.48</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>) </td> <td align="center">2.086 (0.040)</td> <td align="center">2.044 (0.044)</td> <td align="center">1.740 (0.125)</td> <td align="center">1.763 (0.081)</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Personalized scaling period setting</td> <td align="left">Yes</td> <td align="center">2.18 &#xB1; 0.27</td> <td align="center">2.17 &#xB1; 0.26</td> <td align="center">2.95 &#xB1; 0.15</td> <td align="center">2.64 &#xB1; 0.35</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">No</td> <td align="center">2.13 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.12 &#xB1; 0.24</td> <td align="center">2.73 &#xB1; 0.35</td> <td align="center">2.46 &#xB1; 0.52</td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left"></td> <td align="left">t (<italic>p</italic><sup>*</sup>) </td> <td align="center">0.436 (0.664)</td> <td align="center">0.926 (0.357)</td> <td align="center">0.436 (0.664)</td> <td align="center">1.799 (0.077)</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table-wrap-foot> <p><sup>*</sup>by t-test</p> </table-wrap-foot> </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="s3e">
        <title>5. Correlation between sub-factors of oral health belief and satisfaction in CDHC group</title>
        <p>Correlation between sub-factors of oral health belief and satisfaction was evaluated in CDHC group. Satisfaction was positively correlated with benefit (r=0.291, <italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.01) and importance (r=0.224, <italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05) &#x3C;<xref ref-type="table" rid="t005">Table 5</xref>&#x3E;.</p><table-wrap id="t005" position="float"> <label>Table 5.</label> <caption><title>Correlation between sub-factors of oral health belief and satisfaction in CDHC group</title></caption> <table rules="groups" frame="hsides"> <thead> <tr valign="middle"> <th align="left"></th> <th align="center">Sensitivity</th> <th align="center">Severity</th> <th align="center">Benefit</th> <th align="center">Importance</th> <th align="center">Disability</th> <th align="center">Satisfaction</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Sensitivity</td> <td align="center">1.000</td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Severity</td> <td align="center">0.626<sup>***</sup> </td> <td align="center">1.000</td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Benefit</td> <td align="center">0.215<sup>*</sup> </td> <td align="center">0.312<sup>**</sup></td> <td align="center">1.000</td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Importance</td> <td align="center">0.249<sup>*</sup></td> <td align="center">0.322<sup>**</sup> </td> <td align="center">0.426<sup>***</sup> </td> <td align="center">1.000</td> <td align="center"></td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Disability</td> <td align="center">0.121</td> <td align="center">-0.003</td> <td align="center">-0.259<sup>*</sup></td> <td align="center">-0.170</td> <td align="center">1.000</td> <td align="center"></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td align="left">Satisfaction</td> <td align="center">0.034</td> <td align="center">0.052</td> <td align="center">0.291<sup>**</sup></td> <td align="center">0.224<sup>*</sup></td> <td align="center">-0.075</td> <td align="center">1.000</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table-wrap-foot> <p><sup>*</sup><italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05, <sup>**</sup><italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.01, <sup>***</sup><italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001, by the pearson&#x2019;s correlation analysis</p> </table-wrap-foot> </table-wrap>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>This study was conducted to assess differences in oral health belief and satisfaction according to scaling experiences with CDHC and provide basic on the application of CDHC. In the CDHC group, 33.7%, 42.4%, and 23.9% brushed teeth &#x2018;less than two times&#x2019;, &#x2018;three times&#x2019;, and &#x2018;more than four times&#x2019; a day, respectively. In the non-CDHC group, 37.0%, 51.1%, and 12.0% brushed teeth &#x2018;less than two times&#x2019;, &#x2018;three times&#x2019;, and &#x2018;more than four times&#x2019; a day, respectively. In both groups, the highest proportion of participants brushed teeth &#x2018;three times a day&#x2019;. In a previous study by Kim <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r015">[15]</xref> using the 2015 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 48.3%, 35.8%, and 15.8% brushed teeth &#x2018;less than two times&#x2019;, &#x2018;three times&#x2019;, and &#x2018;more than four times&#x2019; a day. Compared to these findings, the participants in our study showed improved behavior of brushing. Additionally, in a study of patients with gingivitis and periodontitis who visited dental hospitals or clinics, Moon et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r016">[16]</xref> observed that the greatest proportion of both patient groups with gingivitis and periodontitis brushed teeth &#x2018;three times&#x2019; a day. This finding is in agreement with that of our study. Herein, we observed that 92.4% of the CDHC group and 70.7% of the non-CDHC group used oral care products other than toothbrush and toothpaste. The most common types of oral care products included &#x2018;interdental brush&#x2019; (50.0%), &#x2018;floss&#x2019; (45.7%), and &#x2018;mouthwash&#x2019; (31.5%) in the CDHC group and &#x2018;floss&#x2019; (30.4%), &#x2018;interdental brush&#x2019; (27.2%), and &#x2018;mouthwash&#x2019; (27.2%) in the non-CDHC group. Kim <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r015">[15]</xref> reported that 23.3%, 22.7%, and 19.9% of patients used &#x2018;floss&#x2019;, &#x2018;mouthwash&#x2019;, and &#x2018;interdental brush&#x2019;, respectively. The rate of oral care product use was higher in our study than that in the study by Kim. This may be attributed to the motivation and education for self-management by dental hygienists as the participants of our study received scaling in dental clinics or hospitals.</p>
      <p>In the CDHC group, the proportion of those who visited dental clinics on a regular basis was approximately two times higher than that in the non-CDHC group. It is thought at the oral health education or customized scaling interval during CDHC process by dental hygienists may have had effects. The most common scaling interval was &#x2018;12 months&#x2019; (38.0%) and &#x2018;six months&#x2019; (34.8%) in the CDHC group and &#x2018;12 months&#x2019; (60.9%) and &#x2018;other&#x2019; (23.9%) in the non-CDHC group. In the non-CDHC group, majority of the participants received scaling every 12 months, and this may be due to the coverage of scaling by the national health insurance system. Thus, to improve the oral health of a patient, a dental hygienist needs to set up a customized scaling cycle through re-evaluation after scaling.</p>
      <p>Oral health belief was significantly high in CDHC group participants between the age of 50 and 65. Consistent with our finding, Park <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r017">[17]</xref> previously reported that oral health belief, oral health practice, and oral health-related quality of life were significantly higher in those between the age of 40 and 60. Middle-aged and elderly people suffer from functional loss of teeth and are aware of health risk factors such as poor oral care, stress, drinking, and smoking <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r018">[18]</xref>. This may have contributed to the high oral health belief in those between the age of 50 and 60 in our study. In the CDHC group, the participants respond &#x2018;yes&#x2019; (100.0%) to the item on &#x2018;experience of calculus removal by a dental hygienist with skilled techniques&#x2019; and &#x2018;explanations on adequate oral care methods according to oral conditions&#x2019;. Additionally, our results showed that the satisfaction was higher in all items in the CDHC group than in the non-CDHC group. This suggested that the awareness of CDHC process in the participants may have affected satisfaction with scaling experiences.</p>
      <p>Herein, we observed that in the CDHC group, benefit and importance, which are sub-factors of oral health belief, were positively correlated with satisfaction. This finding is in agreement with the results of a study of adults who visited dental clinics by Choi and Park <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r019">[19]</xref>. In that study, sensitivity was positively correlated with severity and importance. Severity was positively correlated with benefit and importance. Additionally, benefit was significantly correlated with importance. Based on our findings that higher belief on the benefit and importance of oral health is associated with higher satisfaction of scaling experiences, educational competency of dental hygienists must be improved. This study demonstrated that CDHC during scaling and non-surgical periodontal treatment may have positive effects of increasing oral health belief and satisfaction of patients and that scaling with CDHC by dental hygienists may contribute to the management of oral health. Therefore, CHDC should be more actively used in clinical practice to improve the expertise of dental hygienists and increase the belief and satisfaction of patients in oral health. However, several limitations must be considered in the interpretation of this study&#x2019;s findings. Patients who underwent scaling at dental hospitals and clinics were extracted through a convenience sample method. Moreover, some of the processes in the CDHC and non-CDHC groups were identical, limiting complete distinguishment of the two groups. Follow-up studies would need to develop a research tool that can analyze in detail the satisfaction of patients with scaling experiences and conduct an in-depth analysis of the effects of CDHC.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this study, oral health belief and satisfaction in the CDHC and non-CDHC groups were analyzed using the oral health belief model, and basic data for the clinical use of CDHC were obtained. Data were collected from 184 participants, and the following conclusions were obtained.</p>
      <p>1. Oral health behavior in the CDHC group was as follows: 92.4% used oral care products other than toothbrush and toothpaste (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001), and 67.4% visited dental clinics on a regular basis for oral care (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001).</p>
      <p>2. In the CDHC group, oral health belief was the highest with 2.41 points in those between the age of 50-65. Oral health belief of those between the age of 50-65 was significantly different from that of those between the age of 20-29 (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.001).</p>
      <p>3. In the CDHC group, oral health belief according to oral health behaviors was the highest in those who underwent scaling every ‘three months’ (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05).</p>
      <p>4. In the CDHC group, benefit (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.01) and importance (<italic>p</italic>&#x3C;0.05), which are sub-factors of oral health belief, were positively correlated with satisfaction.</p>
      <p>These results showed that CDHC had positive effects on increasing the oral health belief and satisfaction of scaling experience. Thus, CDHC must be used more actively in clinical practice to increase oral health belief and satisfaction of patients undergoing scaling.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <fn-group>
      <fn fn-type="other">
        <label>*</label>
        <p>This article is a condensed form of the first author's master's thesis from Kwangju Women's University.</p>
      </fn>
      <fn fn-type="conflict">
        <p><bold>Conflicts of Interest</bold> The authors declared no conflict of interest.</p>
      </fn>
      <fn fn-type="other">
        <p><bold>Authorship</bold> Conceptualization: MH Kim, SE Moon, YJ Kim, SY Kim, HE Cho, HJ Kang; Data collection: MH Kim, SE Moon; Formal analysis: MH Kim, SE Moon; Writing - original draft: MH Kim, SE Moon; Writing - review &amp; editing: MH Kim, SE Moon, YJ Kim, SY Kim, HE Cho, HJ Kang</p>
      </fn>
    </fn-group>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="r001">
        <label>1.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Song</surname>
              <given-names>JS</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Nam</surname>
              <given-names>CH</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>An analysis on oral health knowledge and satisfaction degree of dental care patients</article-title>
          <source>Public Health</source>
          <year>1997</year>
          <volume>23</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>82</fpage>
          <lpage>100</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r002">
        <label>2.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Goong</surname>
              <given-names>HS</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>DY</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>MY</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>SJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>SH</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>YH</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal>et al.</etal>
          </person-group>
          <source>Periodontology</source>
          <edition>1st ed.</edition>
          <publisher-name>Komoonsa</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Seoul</publisher-loc>
          <year>2011</year>
          <page-range>70</page-range>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r003">
        <label>3.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="web">
          <source>1,637 million outpatients with gingivitis and periodontal disease &#x2018;No.1&#x2019;&#x201D;</source>
          <publisher-name>Dental newspaper</publisher-name>
          <comment>Internet, Available from: <uri>http://www.dentalnews.or.kr/news/article.html?no=27818</uri></comment>
          <date-in-citation>cited 2020 Jun 18</date-in-citation>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r004">
        <label>4.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>YJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>SA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lee</surname>
              <given-names>SL</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>JH</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kang</surname>
              <given-names>HK</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kwak</surname>
              <given-names>JS</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal>et al.</etal>
          </person-group>
          <source>Oral Prophylaxis</source>
          <edition>2nd ed.</edition>
          <publisher-name>Daehan Narae</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Seoul</publisher-loc>
          <year>2012</year>
          <page-range>21</page-range>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r005">
        <label>5.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Kang</surname>
              <given-names>HK</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kang</surname>
              <given-names>HS</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ku</surname>
              <given-names>IY</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kwon</surname>
              <given-names>SJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kwon</surname>
              <given-names>SB</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>GY</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal>et al.</etal>
          </person-group>
          <source>Dental prophylaxis</source>
          <edition>6th ed.</edition>
          <publisher-name>Komoonsa</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Seoul</publisher-loc>
          <year>2016</year>
          <page-range>5</page-range>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r006">
        <label>6.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Paik</surname>
              <given-names>DI</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>HD</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Jin</surname>
              <given-names>BH</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Park</surname>
              <given-names>YD</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Sin</surname>
              <given-names>SC</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cho</surname>
              <given-names>JW</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal>et al.</etal>
          </person-group>
          <source>Clinical preventive dentistry</source>
          <edition>5th ed.</edition>
          <publisher-name>Komoonsa</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Seoul</publisher-loc>
          <year>2012</year>
          <page-range>154</page-range>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r007">
        <label>7.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Moon</surname>
              <given-names>SE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>YJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>SY</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cho</surname>
              <given-names>HE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kang</surname>
              <given-names>HJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hong</surname>
              <given-names>SH</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal>et al.</etal>
          </person-group>
          <source>A study on validity of nonsurgical periodontal therapy of clinical dental hygienists</source>
          <publisher-name>Korea Dental Hygiene Association</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Seoul</publisher-loc>
          <year>2017</year>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>154</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r008">
        <label>8.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Park</surname>
              <given-names>SM</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Moon</surname>
              <given-names>SE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>YJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>SY</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cho</surname>
              <given-names>HE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kang</surname>
              <given-names>HY</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Qualitative study on the scaling experience through the application of comprehensive dental hygiene care: a grounded theory approach</article-title>
          <source>J Korean Soc Dent Hyg</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          <volume>20</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>395</fpage>
          <lpage>408</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13065/jksdh.20200037</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r009">
        <label>9.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Becker</surname>
              <given-names>MH</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mainman</surname>
              <given-names>LA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kirscht</surname>
              <given-names>JP</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The health belief model and prediction of dietary compliance: a field experiment</article-title>
          <source>J Health Soc Behav</source>
          <year>1977</year>
          <volume>18</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>348</fpage>
          <lpage>366</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2955344</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r010">
        <label>10.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Seo</surname>
              <given-names>MK</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Seo</surname>
              <given-names>HK</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>YB</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>Theories and application in health education</source>
          <publisher-name>Gyechuk</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Seoul</publisher-loc>
          <year>2001</year>
          <fpage>8</fpage>
          <lpage>113</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r011">
        <label>11.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Lee</surname>
              <given-names>HY</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lee</surname>
              <given-names>YH</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Association between oral health beliefs and oral health related quality of life according to the DISC behavioral style in workers</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Korean Society of Oral Health Science</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          <volume>2</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>54</fpage>
          <lpage>63</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r012">
        <label>12.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Hong</surname>
              <given-names>HS</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Choi</surname>
              <given-names>YH</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ji</surname>
              <given-names>YG</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lee</surname>
              <given-names>SG</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kwon</surname>
              <given-names>HJ</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The effects of the service quality of the dental hygienist on patients&#x2019; satisfaction and their intentions to revisit and recommend of dental care services</article-title>
          <source>J Korean Acad Oral Health</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>30</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>130</fpage>
          <lpage>140</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r013">
        <label>13.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Han</surname>
              <given-names>JH</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>The analysis of the factors related with dentla hygienists affecting patient satisfaction and loyalty[Master&#x2019;s thesis]</source>
          <publisher-name>Univ. of Inje</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Gimhae</publisher-loc>
          <year>2002</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r014">
        <label>14.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Moon</surname>
              <given-names>SE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hong</surname>
              <given-names>SH</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>YJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>SY</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cho</surname>
              <given-names>HE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cheon</surname>
              <given-names>HW</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal>et al.</etal>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Use of CDHC - applied educational curricula by dental hygiene departments in Korean universities</article-title>
          <source>J Korean Soc Dent Hyg</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          <volume>19</volume>
          <issue>5</issue>
          <fpage>651</fpage>
          <lpage>664</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13065/jksdh.20190056</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r015">
        <label>15.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>YS</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>The effect of systemic disease and oral health behavior on periodontal disease: using data from the 2015 Korea national health and nutrition examination survey[Master&#x2019;s thesis]</source>
          <publisher-name>Univ. of Kongju</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Gongju</publisher-loc>
          <year>2017</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r016">
        <label>16.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Moon</surname>
              <given-names>SE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hong</surname>
              <given-names>SH</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kim</surname>
              <given-names>HJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Seo</surname>
              <given-names>GH</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Park</surname>
              <given-names>JA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lee</surname>
              <given-names>JY</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal>et al.</etal>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Study on the relevance of dietary behavior and oral management by periodontal assessment and survey</article-title>
          <source>J Korean Soc Dent Hyg</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          <volume>20</volume>
          <issue>6</issue>
          <fpage>949</fpage>
          <lpage>961</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13065/jksdh.20200087</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r017">
        <label>17.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Park</surname>
              <given-names>JP</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>The relationship of oral health belief, oral health practice and OHIP - 14 amang adult vistors at Gijang public health center[Master&#x2019;s thesis]</source>
          <publisher-name>Univ. of Inje</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Gimhae</publisher-loc>
          <year>2013</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r018">
        <label>18.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Kwon</surname>
              <given-names>SB</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <source>The effects of comprehensive dental hygiene curriculum on the professional roles improvement of dental hygienists[Doctoral dissertation]</source>
          <publisher-name>Univ. of Dankook</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>Yongin</publisher-loc>
          <year>2010</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r019">
        <label>19.</label>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Choi</surname>
              <given-names>YJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Park</surname>
              <given-names>JS</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The effects of oral health belief on oral disease prevention and quality of life</article-title>
          <source>Korean J Health Service Manage</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>113</fpage>
          <lpage>122</lpage>
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12811/kshsm.2016.10.3.113</pub-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
