[journal]
Amoo, T
/ 2001
/ Do numeric values influence subjects' responses to rating scales
/ Journal of International Marketing and Marketing Research
26
: 41~46
[journal]
Armitage, C
/ 2004
/ Changing student evaluations by means of the numeric values of rating scales
/ Psychology Learning and Teaching
3
: 122~125
[journal]
Armstong, R. L
/ 1987
/ The midpoint on a five-point Likert-type scale
/ Perceptual and Motor Skills
64
: 359~362
[journal]
Beck, J
/ 1996
/ Career anchors, organizational commitment, and job plateaus: An analysis of hotel executive operating committee members' career development. (Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University, 1996)
/ Dissertation Abstracts International
/ Publication Number: AAT 9725508
58(3)
[journal]
Becker, S. L
/ 1954
/ Why an order effect
/ Public Opinion Quarterly
18
: 271~278
[journal]
Belson, W. A
/ 1966
/ The effects of reversing the presentation order of verbal rating scales
/ Journal of Advertising Research
6
: 30~376
[journal]
Bignami-Van Assche, S. G
/ 2003
/ An assessment of the KDICP and MDICP data quality
/ Demographic Research
1(2)
: 31~76
[journal]
Brook, D
/ 1974
/ Primacy effects in single trial free recall
/ Applied Statistics
23
: 414~419
[journal]
Carp, F. M
/ 1974
/ Position effects on interview response
/ Journal of Gerontology
29
: 581~587
[journal]
Church, A. H
/ 1993
/ Estimating the effect of incentive on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis
/ Public Opinion Quarterly
57
: 62~79
[journal]
Cobanoglu, C
/ 2001
/ A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods
/ International Journal of Market Research
43(4)
: 441~452
[confproc]
Cummins, R. A
/ 2000
/ Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement
/ ceedings, Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, Singapore: National University of Singapore
: 74~93
[journal]
Dawes, J
/ 2008
/ Do data characteristics change according to the number of points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales
/ International Journal of Market Research
50
: 61~77
[book]
De Leeuw, E. D
/ 1992
/ Data Quality in Mail, Telephone, and Face-to-face Surveys
/ TT Publications
[book]
Dillman, D. A
/ 1999
/ Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method
/ John Wiley and Sons
[journal]
Everett, S. A
/ 1997
/ The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians
/ Eval Health Professions
20
: 204~207
[journal]
Fox, R. J.
/ 1988
/ Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for introducing response
/ Public Opinion Quarterly
52
: 467~491
[journal]
Friedman, H. H
/ 1981
/ A comparison of balanced and unbalanced rating scales
/ The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business
19(2)
: 1~7
[journal]
Garland, R
/ 1991
/ The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable
/ Marketing Bulletin
2
: 66~70
[journal]
Goldberg, L. R
/ 1981
/ Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral, and ambiguous ones: A psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others
/ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
41(3)
: 517~552
[book]
Green, B. F
/ 1969
/ Attitude measurement, In Handbook of Social Psychology
/ Addison-Wesley
[journal]
Guy, R. F
/ 1977
/ The neutral point on a Likert scale
/ Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied
95(2)
: 199~204
[journal]
Hartley, J
/ 2010
/ Four layouts and a finding: The effects of changes in the order of the verbal labels and numerical values on Likert-type scales
/ International Journal of Social Research Methodology
13(1)
: 17~27
[journal]
Jacoby, J
/ 1971
/ Three-point Likert scales are good enough
/ Journal of Marketing Research
8
: 495~500
[journal]
James, J
/ 1992
/ Large monetary incentives and their effect on mail survey response rates
/ Public Opinion Quarterly
56
: 442~453
[journal]
Komorita, S. S
/ 1963
/ Attitude content, intensity and the neutral point on a Likert scale
/ Journal of Social Psychology
61
: 327~334
[journal]
Krosnick, J. A
/ 1987
/ An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement
/ Public Opinion Quarterly
51
: 201~209
[journal]
Kulas, J. T
/ 2008
/ Middle response function in Likert-responses to personality items
/ Journal of Business Psychology
22
: 251~259
[journal]
Likert, R
/ 1932
/ A technique for the measurement of attitudes
/ Archives in Psychology
140
: 1~55
[journal]
Matell, M. S
/ 1972
/ Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties
/ Journal of Applied Psychology
56(6)
: 506~509
[journal]
McFadden, L. S
/ 1984
/ Psychometric function of the "neutral" response option in clinical personality scales
/ Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research
7
: 25~33
[journal]
Mueller, J. E
/ 1970
/ Choosing among 133 candidates
/ Public Opinion Quarterly
34
: 395~402
[journal]
Nicholls, M. R.
/ 2006
/ Satisfaction guaranteed: The effect of spatial biases on responses to Likert scales
/ Psychological Science
17
: 1027~1028
[journal]
/ 2010
/ A Study on Developing Evaluation Criteria for Electronic Resources in Evaluation Indicators of Libraries
/ JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP
/ ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
36(1)
: 41~52
[journal]
Noh, Y
/ 2010
/ A Study on Metadata Elements for Web-based Reference Resources System Developed through Usability Testing
/ Library Hi Tech
29(2)
: 242~265
[journal]
Payne, J. D
/ 1971
/ The effects of reversing the order of verbal rating scales in a postal survey
/ Journal of the Market Research Society
14
: 30~44
[book]
Payne, S. L
/ 1951
/ The Art of Asking Questions
/ Princeton University Press
[book]
Quinn, S. B
/ 1969
/ The Effects of Reversing of the Order of Presentation of Verbal Rating Scales in Survey Interviews
/ Survey Research Centre
[book]
Ruggg, D
/ 1944
/ The wording of questions, In Gauging public opinion
/ Princeton University Press
[journal]
Schwarz, N. B
/ 1991
/ Rating scales: Numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels
/ Public Opinion Quarterly
55
: 570~582
[book]
Schwarz, N
/ 1992
/ A cognitive model of response-order effects in survey measurement, In Context effects in social and psychological research
/ Springer-Verlag
: 187~199
[journal]
Sedlmeier, P
/ 2006
/ The role of scales in student ratings
/ Learning and Instruction
16
: 401~415
[book]
Shcuman, H
/ 1981
/ Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys
/ Academic Press
[journal]
Sheehan, B. K
/ 1999
/ Response variation in e-mail surveys: An exploration
/ Journal of Advertising Journal
39(4)
: 45~54
[journal]
Stewart, T. J
/ 2006
/ Reliability and validity issues for two common measures of medical students' attitudes toward older adults
/ Educational Gerontology
32
: 409~421
[journal]
Weems, G. H
/ 2003
/ Characteristics of respondents who respond differently to positively and negatively worded items on rating scales
/ Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
28
: 587~607
[journal]
Wildt, A. R
/ 1978
/ Determinants of scale responses: Label versus position
/ Journal of Marketing Research
: 261~267
[journal]
Worcester, R. M
/ 1975
/ A statistical examination of the relative precision of verbal scales
/ Journal of Market Research Society
17(3)
: 181~197
[journal]
Wyatt, R. C
/ 1987
/ Psychometric properties of four 5-point Likert-type scales
/ Educational and Phychologicla Measurement
47
: 27~35
[journal]
Yammarino, F. J
/ 1991
/ Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis
/ Public Opinion Quarterly
55
: 613~639
[journal]
Yun, G. W
/ 2000
/ Comparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail, & web form
/ Journal of Market Research Society
6(1)
: 235~239
[book]
Dillman, D. A
/ 1988
/ Administrative issues in mixed mode surveys, In Telephone survey methodology
/ Wiley
: 509~528