@article{ART002794954},
author={DOWAN KIM},
title={A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal},
journal={Journal of Software Assessment and Valuation},
issn={2092-8114},
year={2021},
volume={17},
number={2},
pages={11-17},
doi={10.29056/jsav.2021.12.02}
TY - JOUR
AU - DOWAN KIM
TI - A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal
JO - Journal of Software Assessment and Valuation
PY - 2021
VL - 17
IS - 2
PB - Korea Software Assessment and Valuation Society
SP - 11
EP - 17
SN - 2092-8114
AB - In this study, problems of software completeness appraisal are pointed out and their solutions are presented by analyzing appraisal cases and judicial precedents. Completeness appraisal, ready-made appraisal, defect appraisal, and cost appraisal have been classified as and have been evaluated with extant software completeness appraisals. From a legal point of view, and in judicial precedents, however, there is a big difference between the definition of completeness and the completion rate. This is because the degree of completeness is evaluated under the premise that the software’s development is complete, whereas the ready-made appraisal inspects the development progress of unfinished software. Often, in cases involving software completion rate, the total completion level is calculated by weighting each step of the software development process. However, completeness evaluations use the software’s realization-operation as its sole criterion. In addition, another issue not addressed in existing software completeness appraisal cases is that there is no mention of who is responsible for software defects, whereas in case law, the responsible party is determined by finding who caused the dispute. In this paper, we systematically classify these problems, and present a novel evaluation method that separates software completeness evaluations from software completion evaluations.
KW - SW completeness evaluation;SW ready-made rate appraisal;SW defect appraisal;SW copyright precedent;SW Engineering process
DO - 10.29056/jsav.2021.12.02
ER -
DOWAN KIM. (2021). A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal. Journal of Software Assessment and Valuation, 17(2), 11-17.
DOWAN KIM. 2021, "A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal", Journal of Software Assessment and Valuation, vol.17, no.2 pp.11-17. Available from: doi:10.29056/jsav.2021.12.02
DOWAN KIM "A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal" Journal of Software Assessment and Valuation 17.2 pp.11-17 (2021) : 11.
DOWAN KIM. A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal. 2021; 17(2), 11-17. Available from: doi:10.29056/jsav.2021.12.02
DOWAN KIM. "A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal" Journal of Software Assessment and Valuation 17, no.2 (2021) : 11-17.doi: 10.29056/jsav.2021.12.02
DOWAN KIM. A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal. Journal of Software Assessment and Valuation, 17(2), 11-17. doi: 10.29056/jsav.2021.12.02
DOWAN KIM. A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal. Journal of Software Assessment and Valuation. 2021; 17(2) 11-17. doi: 10.29056/jsav.2021.12.02
DOWAN KIM. A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal. 2021; 17(2), 11-17. Available from: doi:10.29056/jsav.2021.12.02
DOWAN KIM. "A Study on the Need for Separation of Software Completeness Appraisal and Software Ready-made Appraisal" Journal of Software Assessment and Valuation 17, no.2 (2021) : 11-17.doi: 10.29056/jsav.2021.12.02
