@article{ART000980165},
author={Meeae Lee},
title={Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU},
journal={Korean Journal of Medical Ethics },
issn={2005-8284},
year={2004},
volume={7},
number={1},
pages={91-101}
TY - JOUR
AU - Meeae Lee
TI - Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU
JO - Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
PY - 2004
VL - 7
IS - 1
PB - The Korean Society For Medical Ethics
SP - 91
EP - 101
SN - 2005-8284
AB - The purpose of this study attempts to identify knowledge, opinions, and atiitudes on life-sustaining treatments of physicians in the ICU. The survey was done on 28 hospitals, at which 2 surveys were conducted. Analysis sample included 56 cases. All of respondents were physicians who were in charge of ICU. None of 28 hospitals had a document related to DNR orders. About 41% of respondents had an experience of oral communications on the subject of DNR orders with caregivers and/or patients.
Results were as follows:
1) About 73% of respondents have some degree of knowledge about DNR orders.
2) None of 28 hospitals in the area of Chungchungnam-do, Chungchungbuk-do, and Daejeon-city had a document related to DNR orders. But, before the withdrawl of life-sustaining treatments, there has been communications among physicians, caregivers, and patients.
3) 53.6% of respondents had the experiences on the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments, for this study, CPR. Primary caregivers played a prioritized role in the decision-making process of end-of-life care along with physicians in the ICU. In contrast, patients' role was reported to be minimal. In contrast with the Western countries, patients' right to decision didn't seem to be weighed much. Majority of respondents thought beginning of life-sustaining treatments too many but the withdrawal too few as they should be done on the basis of medical judgement.
4) Presumed that there is no chance of recovery, as for factors affecting physicians' decision on the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in the ICU, physician's medical judgement was the most frequent factor, caregivers' need the second. Patients' need was one of those factors which considered the least frequent.
KW - Advance Directives;Patients' Right to Self-Determination;DNR orders
DO -
UR -
ER -
Meeae Lee. (2004). Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics , 7(1), 91-101.
Meeae Lee. 2004, "Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU", Korean Journal of Medical Ethics , vol.7, no.1 pp.91-101.
Meeae Lee "Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU" Korean Journal of Medical Ethics 7.1 pp.91-101 (2004) : 91.
Meeae Lee. Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU. 2004; 7(1), 91-101.
Meeae Lee. "Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU" Korean Journal of Medical Ethics 7, no.1 (2004) : 91-101.
Meeae Lee. Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics , 7(1), 91-101.
Meeae Lee. Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics . 2004; 7(1) 91-101.
Meeae Lee. Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU. 2004; 7(1), 91-101.
Meeae Lee. "Survey on Physicians' Opinions on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU" Korean Journal of Medical Ethics 7, no.1 (2004) : 91-101.
