Making Decisions for Unbefriended Patients on Life-Sustaining-Treatment in South Korea: Healthcare Providers’ Experiences

Jiyeon Choi (최지연); Heejung Jeon (전희정); Ilhak LEE (이일학)

doi:10.35301/ksme.2021.24.3.271

Making Decisions for Unbefriended Patients on Life-Sustaining-Treatment in South Korea: Healthcare Providers’ Experiences

Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
Abbr : 의료윤리
2021, 24(3), pp.271-285
DOI : 10.35301/ksme.2021.24.3.271
Publisher : The Korean Society For Medical Ethics
Research Area : Medicine and Pharmacy > General Medicine
Received : March 4, 2021
Accepted : May 24, 2021
Published : September 30, 2021

Jiyeon Choi ¹, Heejung Jeon ¹, Ilhak LEE ¹

¹연세대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This study attempts to clarify the difficulties faced by healthcare professionals in South Korea in making and implementing Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) decisions for vulnerable patients who lack legally competent proxy decision-makers. Materials and Methods: First, a keyword analysis was performed on the official responses of the National Health Agency of Korea to 750 questions from healthcare workers. Second, a survey probing the difficulties that healthcare professionals face in making LST decisions was administered to the ethics committee members of 246 medical institutions. Results: From the keyword analysis, 139 keywords were categorized into ten subcategories. The survey had a 32.5% response rate, and of the respondents, 41.98% faced difficulties in making decisions for unrepresented patients because of the absence of family members or due to inadequate evidence. Among these patients, 82.35% did not have decision-making ability at the time of need and 85.29% had no family members to consult with. Conclusion: Four categories of “unbefriended” patients were identified in this study. Additionally, in uncovering evidence on how LST decisions are implemented and creating a category of “unbe-friended patients,” this study underscores the need to expand the scope of legal proxies under the LST Decisions Act.

KEYWORDS

proxy, clinical ethics, decision making, end-of-life decision, Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Act

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[other] / 2016 / The Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or At the End of Life. Act No. 14013, February 3, 2016

[journal] 최경석 / 2016 / Legal and Ethical Issues Regarding End-of-Life Care in Korea / Journal of Asian Sociology / 사회발전연구소 45(1) : 151~164

[journal] Tanaka M / 2020 / Forgoing life-sustaining treatment – a comparative analysis of regulations in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and England / BMC Medical Ethics 21(1) : 99~

[web] The National Agency for Management of Life-Sustaining Treatment / Monthly Statistics / https://www.lst.go.kr/comm/monthlyStatistics.do

[journal] Moore KA / 2016 / The problems with physician orders for life-sustaining treatment / JAMA 315(3) : 259~260

[journal] Connor DM / 2016 / The unbefriended patient : an exercise in ethical clinical reasoning / J Gen Intern Med 31(1) : 128~132

[journal] Gillett G / 2019 / Advance decisions in dementia : when the past conflicts with the present / J Med Ethics 45(3) : 204~208

[journal] Willmott L / 2016 / Reasons doctors provide futile treatment at the end of life: a qualitative study / J Med Ethics 42(8) : 496~503

[journal] 백수진 / 2019 / Respect for self-determination on Life-Sustaining Treatment Act and Protection of right in a Patient with disability / 생명윤리정책연구 / 생명의료법연구소 13(1) : 101~116

[journal] 최지연 / 2019 / Institutional Ethics Committees for Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment in Korea: Their Current State and Experiences with their Operation / 한국의료윤리학회지 / 한국의료윤리학회 22(3) : 209~233

[journal] 김명희 / 2018 / The Problems and the Improvement Plan of the Hospice/Palliative Care and Dying Patient’s Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment Act / Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care / 한국호스피스완화의료학회 21(1) : 1~8

[journal] Kim JW / 2019 / Completion rate of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent cancer : a preliminary, cross-sectional study / BMC Palliat Care 18(1) : 84~

[journal] Yoo SH / 2020 / Association of illness understanding with advance care planning and end-of-life care preferences for advanced cancer patients and their family members / Support Care Cancer 28(6) : 2959~2967

[journal] 장한철 / 2016 / Untersuchung ueber Probleme des sog. Gesetzes der Bestimmung von den lebenhaltenden medizinischen Behandlungen / 동북아법연구 / 동북아법연구소 10(2) : 371~399

[journal] 허정식 / 2019 / Act on hospice-palliative care and life-sustaining treatment decision-making and institutional measures for its implementation / Journal of Medicine and Life Science / 의과학연구소 16(3) : 80~83

[journal] 김정아 / 2017 / Two Conceptions of Autonomy in Surrogate Decision-Making for Life-Sustaining Treatment: An Examination of Article 18 of the Hospice, Palliative Care, and Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act / 한국의료윤리학회지 / 한국의료윤리학회 20(1) : 56~77

[journal] Pope TM / 2017 / Unbefriended and unrepresented : better medical decision making for incapacitated patients without healthcare surrogates / Ga State Univ Law Rev 33(4) : 923~1019

[journal] Pope TM / 2013 / Making medical decisions for patients without surrogates / N Engl J Med 369(21) : 1976~1978

[journal] Connor DM / 2015 / The unbefriended patient : an exercise in ethical clinical reasoning / J Gen Intern Med 31(1) : 128~132

[other] / 2017 / Civil Act No. 14965, October 31, 2017

[journal] Willmott L / 2016 / Reasons doctors provide futile treatment at the end of life: a qualitative study / J Med Ethics 42(8) : 496~503

[journal] Kim SH / 2011 / Factors influencing preferences of Korean people toward advance directives / Nurs Ethics 18(4) : 505~513

[book] Buchanan AE / 1989 / Deciding for others : the ethics of surrogate decision making / Cambridge University Press

[journal] Kim H / 2016 / Ethical frameworks for surrogates’ end-of-life planning experiences / Nurs Ethics 24(1) : 46~69

[journal] Cresp SJ / 2017 / Experiences of substitute decision makers in making decisions for older persons diagnosed with major neurocognitive disorder at end of life / JBI Database of Systematic Rev Implement Rep 15(7) : 1770~1777

[journal] 장병주 / 2017 / Gesetz zur Entscheidung der lebensverlängerenden ärtzlichen Maßnahme und Abbruch der lebensverlängerenden ärtzlichen Maßnahme - Entscheidung der lebensverlängerenden ärtzlichen Maßnahme im deutschen und koreanischen Recht - / 재산법연구 / 한국재산법학회 33(4) : 169~199

[other] / 2009 / Supreme Court of Korea. Decision of May 21, 2009. 2009Da17417

This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Korean Journal of Medical Ethics 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.21

Making Decisions for Unbefriended Patients on Life-Sustaining-Treatment in South Korea: Healthcare Providers’ Experiences

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Korean Journal of Medical Ethics 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.21

Making Decisions for Unbefriended Patients on Life-Sustaining-Treatment in South Korea: Healthcare Providers’ Experiences

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Statistics

Tools

Issue List

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (1)

REFERENCES (27) * References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Search PDF

Citation

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.