Considerations for Implementing a Patient and Public Engagement Model of Healthcare AI (보건의료 AI 개발에서 환자 시민 참여 모델 적용을 위한 제언)

Junghyun Lee (이정현); Hannah Kim (김한나)

doi:10.35301/ksme.2024.27.4.215

Considerations for Implementing a Patient and Public Engagement Model of Healthcare AI

Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
Abbr : 의료윤리
2024, 27(4), pp.215~220
DOI : 10.35301/ksme.2024.27.4.215
Publisher : The Korean Society For Medical Ethics
Research Area : Medicine and Pharmacy > General Medicine
Received : November 11, 2024
Accepted : December 20, 2024
Published : December 31, 2024

Junghyun Lee ¹, Hannah Kim ²

¹연세대학교 의료법윤리학연구원
²연세대학교 의료법윤리학연구원;연세대학교 의과대학 인문사회의학교실

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This commentary builds on the lead article for this volume by proposing additional considerations for implementing a healthcare AI framework centered on patients and citizens. It argues that rather than being mere data providers, patients and citizens must serve as external validators, thereby enhancing transparency and fairness in the development of healthcare AI. The participation of patients and citizens is essential to safeguarding the rights of data providers, ensuring transparent AI usage, and promoting equitable healthcare access. However, current domestic systems, including broad consent mechanisms, limit meaningful involvement. This commentary addresses these limitations by highlighting the need for centralized, provider-focused data governance, clear information dissemination, and ongoing education initiatives. Ultimately, while the participation of patients and citizens is crucial for fostering trust in healthcare AI, that participation must be supported with systematic strategies and long-term investments.

KEYWORDS

artificial intelligence (AI), healthcare AI, centralized data control, data sharing, patient and public engagement

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.

[journal] Price WN 2nd / 2019 / Privacy in the age of medical big data / Nat Med 25(1) : 37~43

[journal] Sieber R / 2024 / Who are the publics engaging in AI? / Public Underst Sci 33(5) : 634~653

[book] OECD / 2009 / Focus on citizens: public engagement for better policy and services / OECD Studies on Public Engagement

[journal] Cameron H / 2024 / Ethical considerations in health data sharing: balancing privacy, confidentiality and data utility / J Health Med Inform 15(2) : 520~

[journal] Loftus TJ / 2022 / Executive summary of the artificial intelligence in surgery series / Surgery 171(5) : 1435~1439

[book] Cowls J / 2019 / The 2019 yearbook of the digital ethics lab / Digital Ethics Lab Yearbook

[journal] Kwangsu M / 2019 / The Ethical Use of Biomedical Big Data: Shifting from a Consent Model to an Agreement Model / Korean J Med Ethics 22(1) : 1~19

[journal] Cho SJ / 2022 / The overview of the public opinion survey and emerging ethical challenges in the healthcare big data Research / J KAIRB 4(1) : 16~22

[journal] Kaufman DJ / 2016 / A survey of U. S adults’ opinions about conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative cohort study of genes and environment / PLOS ONE 11(8) : e0160461~

[journal] Yang JH / 2023 / Public perceptions and attitudes of the national project of bio-big data : a nationwide survey in the Republic of Korea / Front Genet 14 : 1081812~

[journal] Pearce A / 2024 / Publics’ knowledge of, attitude to and motivation towards health-related genomics : a scoping review / Eur J Hum Genet 32(7) : 747~758

[journal] Waisbren SE / 2015 / Parents are interested in newborn genomic testing during the early postpartum period / Genet Med 17(6) : 501~504

[journal] van der Pal SM / 2022 / Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening / PLOS ONE 17(8) : e0272585~

[journal] Michelson KN / 2022 / Navigating clinical and business ethics while sharing patient data / JAMA 327(11) : 1025~1026

[other] / 2023 / Dinerstein v. Google, LLC. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 20-3134

[web] Abdala MB / 2020 / Managing the transition to a multi-stakeholder artificial intelligence governance / Global Solutions Initiative / https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/analyses/managing-the-transition-to-a-multistakeholder-artificial-intelligence-governance/

[web] Ministry of Health and Welfare / 2024 / Improving public health through artificial intelligence-based medical technology innovation / Ministry of Health and Welfare / https://www.mohw.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10503000000&bid=0027&list_no=1483021&act=view&#share

[web] Bioethics Advisory Committee / 2024 / Advisory report: big data and artificial intelligence in human biomedical research / Bioethics Advisory Committee / https://www.bioethics-singapore.gov.sg/activities/current-projects/1

[web] Indian Council of Medical Research / 2024 / Ethical guidelines for application of artificial intelligence in Biomedical Research and Healthcare 2023 / Indian Council of Medical Research / https://www.icmr.gov.in/ethical-guidelines-for-application-of-artificial-intelligence-inbiomedical-research-and-healthcare

[web] Assemblee Nationale Du Quebec / 2024 / Bill 64, an act to modernize legislative provisions as regards the protection of personal information / Assemblee Nationale Du Quebec / https://www.assnat.qc.ca/en/travaux-parlementaires/projets-loi/projet-loi-64-42-1.html

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Korean Journal of Medical Ethics 2024 KCI Impact Factor : 1.15

Considerations for Implementing a Patient and Public Engagement Model of Healthcare AI

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.

Korean Journal of Medical Ethics 2024 KCI Impact Factor : 1.15

Considerations for Implementing a Patient and Public Engagement Model of Healthcare AI

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Statistics

Tools

Issue List

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (0)

REFERENCES (20) * References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.

Search PDF

Citation

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.