본문 바로가기
  • Home

Health Care Reform and Democratic Expertise in South Korea

  • Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
  • Abbr : 의료윤리
  • 2025, 28(4), pp.257~277
  • Publisher : The Korean Society For Medical Ethics
  • Research Area : Medicine and Pharmacy > General Medicine
  • Received : October 26, 2025
  • Accepted : December 8, 2025
  • Published : December 31, 2025

Ungki Jung 1

1존스홉킨스대학교 정치학과

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The evidence advisory system (EAS) is often criticized for serving to legitimize governmentpreferredpolicies rather than facilitating independent deliberation. Underlying this critique is a morefundamental question: Is expertise compatible with democratic governance? This article addressesthat question by advancing two arguments in support of democratic expertise. First, drawingon theories of deliberative democracy, it argues that the epistemic authority of experts dependslargely on the active judgment of citizens. The formation of expert consensus, which is central toEAS operations, is discussed as a working example. Second, using the framework of the politics ofevidence, it contends that the legitimacy of the EAS hinges on institutional arrangements that enablethe effective and democratic use of evidence. Together, these arguments clarify how ordinary citizenscan develop the deliberative capacities needed to engage critically with expert knowledge.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.