본문 바로가기
  • Home

Between Cost Containment and Care Burden: Relational Conditions of End-of-Life Self-Determination

  • Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
  • Abbr : 의료윤리
  • 2026, 29(2), pp.93~98
  • Publisher : The Korean Society For Medical Ethics
  • Research Area : Medicine and Pharmacy > General Medicine
  • Received : May 7, 2026
  • Accepted : June 1, 2026
  • Published : June 30, 2026

JUNHEWK KIM ORD ID 1

1연세대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This commentary examines the relationship between reduced life-sustaining treatment expenditures and family caregiving burdens in end-of-life care. Responding to Kim et al.’s analysis of advance preference formation and barriers to implementing end-of-life choices in South Korea, it argues that health insurance savings, out-of-pocket medical expenses, paid caregiving costs, and family income loss should not be treated as interchangeable categories. Using a personal caregiving case as an analytic vignette, it illustrates how substantial burdens persist even when high-intensity life-sustaining treatment is forgone. Drawing on Korean and Japanese studies, this commentary further shows that anticipated family burden shapes end-of-life preferences, decision-making authority, and the preferred place of care. It therefore cautions that expanding patient choice without adequate hospice, home care, visiting nursing services, long-term care, public caregiving support, and income protection for family caregivers may reframe unresolved social care burdens merely as matters of individual or family choice.

Journal Copyright Policy

BY-NC 아이콘

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.