Governance for Risk Communication in Food Safety Regulation (식품안전규제에 있어서 소통을 위한 거버넌스 모형 )

Dong-Won Kim (김동원)

Governance for Risk Communication in Food Safety Regulation

Crisisonomy
Abbr : KRCEM
2010, 6(4), pp.239-254
Publisher : Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis
Research Area : Social Science > Public Policy > Public Policy in general

Dong-Won Kim ¹

¹인천대학교

Candidate

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to design the governance model desirable for communication between government and citizens in food safety regulation. To do so, it compared Korea, Japan, and UK cases with a focus on a UK case, one of the most advanced models. In the process of the regulation, risk management as a policy function bases on the results of risk assessment as a research function. UK FSA attempts not only to draw the result of risk assessment on a scientific ground, but also to keep its organic links with policy outcomes. In particular, coordination works through the mechanism of risk communication, in which a diversity of stakeholder participate. It prevents the situation when negative social ripple effects, following policy outcomes, may spread due to the lack of trust.

KEYWORDS

food safety regulation, risk communication, governance

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[journal] 이시철 / 2005 / Motivations to Comply, and Relative Impact Analysis of Compliance Factors / 한국행정학보 / 한국행정학회 39(4) : 347~368

[report] Food Safety Commission / 2010 / Food Safety Commission: Food Safety Commission of Japan2010

[report] FSA(Food Standards Agency) / 2006 / Good Practice Guidelines for the Independent Scientific Advisory Committees

[other] FSA(Food Standards Agency) / 2006 / A Framework for Regulatory Decision Making in the Food Standards Agency

[other] FSA(Food Standards Agency) / 2007 / Food Regulation Statement of Intent: Strengthening the Central/Local Government Partnership

[report] GACS(General Advisory Committee on Science) / 2008 / Code of Practice

[report] GACS(General Advisory Committee on Science) / 2008 / Science Governance: Issues Raised in Two Reports

[book] Jasanoff, Shelia / 1994 / Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers / Havard Univ. Press

[journal] Millstone, Erik / 2009 / Science, Risk and Governance: Radical Rhetorics and Realities of Reform in Food Safety Governance / Research Policy 38 : 624~636

[report] US NRC / 1983 / Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process / National Research Council

[report] OECD / 1993 / Safety Evaluation of Foods Derived by Modern Biotechnology Concepts and Principles / OECD

[web] WTO / The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) / http://www.wto.org/English/tratop e/sps e/spsagr e.htm.

[book] van Zwanenberg, P. / 2005 / BSE: Risk, Science and Governance / Oxford University Press

[web] / Joint Code of Practice for Research / http://www.food.gov.uk/science/researchpolicy/qacopres/.

[web] / Research Requirements: Background and Instructions / http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research policy/qacopres/

[web] / Quality Assurance in Research-Auditing Against the Joint Code of Practice for Research / http://www.food.gov.uk/science/researchpolicy/qacopres/

[web] / Social Science Research Committee / http://www.food.gov.uk/science/ouradvisors/ssrc/

[web] / Consumer Stakeholder Forum / http://www.food.gov.uk/aboutus/how_we_work/stakeholderforums/

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Crisisonomy 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 0.64